Component-based model for bolted brace connections in conventional concentrically braced frames

被引:8
作者
Wang, Chen [1 ]
Tremblay, Robert [2 ]
Rogers, Colin A. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Polytech Montreal, Dept Civil Geol & Min Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
Low ductility; Concentrically braced frame; Bolted brace connection; Component-based model; Nonlinear dynamic analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113137
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In low and moderate seismic regions, low-ductility concentrically braced frames (CBFs) are widely used as the seismic force-resisting system for steel structures. The capacity-based design method is not required for such systems, i.e. no individual component in the lateral load carrying path is explicitly designated to sustain plastic deformations under seismic loading. Such CBFs are referred to as conventional CBFs (CCBFs) in this paper. Prior studies have revealed that, in CCBFs, the brace-to-gusset connections are inherently weaker in tension than the adjoining braces and gusset plates. Therefore, the accurate numerical modelling of the brace connections is critical for the reliable seismic evaluation of CCBFs. However, few research publications address the inelastic bolted brace connection modelling necessary for the structural analyses of these braced frame systems. In this paper, an efficient inelastic numerical modelling method, comprising the component-based modelling concept, is proposed for bolted brace connections. The accuracy of the numerical model is validated through comparison with laboratory test results of full-scale I-shape brace connection specimens. Eight single-storey CCBFs with the symmetric diagonal bracing configuration were designed and modeled. The nonlinear static and dynamic ana-lyses revealed that: 1) although the buckling of the middle column at small storey drifts resulted in substantial lateral strength deterioration, a secondary seismic mechanism provided stable resistance to prevent collapse; 2) when loaded in tension, the brace connections deformed more than the braces; 3) stronger brace connections resulted in higher structural lateral stiffness and triggered earlier buckling of the middle column; 4) stronger brace connections possessed higher frictional energy-dissipating capacity which reduced the maximum storey drift.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
American Society of Civil Engineers/Structural Engineering Institute (ASCE/SEI) 7-16, 2016, MIN DES LOADS ASS CR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SEISM PROV STRUCT ST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 19981 EN EUR COMM ST
[4]   Earthquake time histories compatible with the 2005 National building code of Canada uniform hazard spectrum [J].
Atkinson, Gail M. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2009, 36 (06) :991-1000
[5]   Full-Scale Cyclic Testing of Low-Ductility Concentrically Braced Frames [J].
Bradley, Cameron R. ;
Fahnestock, Larry A. ;
Hines, Eric M. ;
Sizemore, Joshua G. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 143 (06)
[6]  
Canadian Standards Association (CSA) S16-19, 2019, SI619 CSA
[7]  
Filippou F., 1983, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report UCB/EERC-83/19, V4th
[8]  
Fisher J.W., 1974, GUIDE DESIGN CRITERI
[9]  
Gonzalez Urena A, 2020, 17 WORLD C EARTHQ EN
[10]   Seismic Vulnerability of Older Braced Frames [J].
Hsiao, Po-Chien ;
Lehman, Dawn E. ;
Berman, Jeffrey W. ;
Roeder, Charles W. ;
Powell, Jake .
JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2014, 28 (01) :108-120