The positive predictive value of paramedic versus emergency physician interpretation of the prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram

被引:46
作者
Davis, Daniel P.
Graydon, Cheryl
Stein, Robert
Wilson, Siobhan
Buesch, Barbara
Berthiaume, Shelley
Lee, David M.
Rivas, Jaime
Vilke, Gary M.
Leahy, Dennis R.
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Emergency Med, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Palomar Med Ctr, Escondido, CA USA
[3] UC San Diego Sch Med, La Jolla, CA USA
关键词
ST elevation myocardial infarction; electrocardiogram; paramedics; chest pain; percutaneous intervention; cardiac receiving centers;
D O I
10.1080/10903120701536784
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. Obtaining a prehospital 12-lead ECG may improve triage and expedite care of patients with acute myocardial infarction ( AMI). Whether the ECG should undergo physician review prior to activation of a percutaneous intervention (PCI) team is unclear. Objective. To document the positive predictive value (PPV) of the prehospital 12-lead ECG when interpreted by paramedics versus emergency physicians. Methods. This was a prospective, observational study. In November 2003, our local health care and emergency medical services ( EMS) systems implemented a prehospital "cardiac alert" program in which patients suspected of having ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) based on the prehospital 12-lead ECG were diverted away from receiving facilities without emergent PCI capability and the PCI team was mobilized. For the first year, a cardiac alert was activated by paramedics ( Phase I). After the first year, the ECG was transmitted to the ED, with the emergency physician (EP) responsible for activation ( Phase II). The PPV for cardiac alerts in Phases I and II were compared by using three different "gold standards": cardiologist interpretation of the prehospital 12-lead ECG, disposition to emergent PCI, and coronary lesions on angiography or arrest prior to emergent PCI. Results. A total of 110 patients were enrolled ( 54 in Phase I, 56 in Phase II). Cardiologist confirmation of a STEMI on the prehospital 12-lead EKG was 42/54 (78%) in Phase I and 54/56 (96%) in Phase II. Disposition to emergent PCI occurred in 38/54 (70%) Phase I patients and 51/56 (91%) Phase II patients. Lesions at catheterization or arrest prior to emergent PCI were observed in 41/54 (69%) of Phase I patients and 50/56 (89%) of Phase II patients. All of these comparisons achieved statistical significance (p< 0.01). Conclusions. Transmission to the ED for EP interpretation improves the PPV of the prehospital 12-lead ECG for triage and therapeutic decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 402
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction
    Andersen, HR
    Nielsen, TT
    Rasmussen, K
    Thuesen, L
    Kelbaek, H
    Thayssen, P
    Abildgaard, U
    Pedersen, F
    Madsen, JK
    Grande, P
    Villadsen, AB
    Krusell, LR
    Haghfelt, T
    Lomholt, P
    Husted, SE
    Vigholt, E
    Kjaergard, HK
    Mortensen, LS
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (08) : 733 - 742
  • [2] Potential diversion rates associated with prehospital acute myocardial infarction triage strategies
    Anderson, PD
    Mitchell, PM
    Rathlev, NK
    Fish, SS
    Feldman, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 27 (04) : 345 - 353
  • [3] ASSOCIATION AH, 2005, CIRCULATION, V112, P89
  • [4] Achieving door-to-balloon times that meet quality guidelines - How do successful hospitals do it?
    Bradley, EH
    Roumanis, SA
    Radford, MJ
    Webster, TR
    McNamara, RL
    Mattera, JA
    Barton, BA
    Berg, DN
    Portnay, EL
    Moscovitz, H
    Parkosewich, J
    Holmboe, ES
    Blaney, M
    Krumholz, HM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 46 (07) : 1236 - 1241
  • [5] Diversion of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients for primary angioplasty based on wireless prehospital 12-lead electrocardiographic transmission directly to the cardiologist's handheld computer: a progress report
    Clemmensen, P
    Sejersten, M
    Sillesen, M
    Hampton, D
    Wagner, GS
    Loumann-Nielsen, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2005, 38 (04) : 194 - 198
  • [6] Comparative accuracy of manual versus computerized electrocardiographic measurement of J-, ST- and T-wave deviations in patients with acute coronary syndrome
    Eskola, MJ
    Nikus, KC
    Voipio-Pulkki, LM
    Huhtala, H
    Parviainen, T
    Lund, J
    Ilva, T
    Porela, P
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 96 (11) : 1584 - 1588
  • [7] Real-time paramedic compared with blinded physician identification of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of an observational study
    Feldman, JA
    Brinsfield, K
    Bernard, S
    White, D
    Maciejko, T
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 23 (04) : 443 - 448
  • [8] LIMITATIONS OF PREHOSPITAL PREDICTORS OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION AND UNSTABLE ANGINA
    HARGARTEN, KM
    APRAHAMIAN, C
    STUEVEN, H
    OLSON, DW
    AUFDERHEIDE, TP
    MATEER, JR
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1987, 16 (12) : 1325 - 1329
  • [9] Hill R, 1997, Prehosp Disaster Med, V12, P141
  • [10] ACCURACY OF COMPUTER-INTERPRETED ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY IN SELECTING PATIENTS FOR THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY
    KUDENCHUK, PJ
    HO, MT
    WEAVER, WD
    LITWIN, PE
    MARTIN, JS
    EISENBERG, MS
    HALLSTROM, AP
    COBB, LA
    KENNEDY, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1991, 17 (07) : 1486 - 1491