Cytomegalovirus risk factors in renal transplantation with modern immunosuppression

被引:38
|
作者
Bataille, S. [1 ]
Moal, V. [1 ]
Gaudart, J. [2 ]
Indreies, M. [1 ]
Purgus, R. [1 ]
Dussol, B. [1 ]
Zandotti, C. [3 ]
Berland, Y. [1 ]
Vacher-Coponat, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Conception, AP HM, Ctr Nephrol & Transplantat Renale, F-13005 Marseille, France
[2] Univ Mediterranee, Fac Med, Serv Sante Publ & Informat Med, Marseille, France
[3] Hop La Timone, AP HM, Virol Lab, Marseille, France
关键词
kidney transplantation; cytomegalovirus; immunosuppressive regimen; renal failure; prophylaxis; preemptive therapy; ORAL GANCICLOVIR; GRAFT-SURVIVAL; INFECTION; KIDNEY; DISEASE; IMPACT; RECIPIENTS; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-3062.2010.00533.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Immunosuppressive regimens have lowered the rate of kidney rejection, but with increasing immunodeficiency-related complications. New cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis also has become available. The impact of these 2 developments on CMV diseases has not been well evaluated. We conducted a randomized trial comparing a drug regimen common in the 1980s, cyclosporin A (CsA) with azathioprine (Aza), with a drug combination used most today, tacrolimus (Tac) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and we analyzed CMV risk factors in kidney transplant patients. Methods The 300 patients included in the trial underwent the same universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. CMV events and risk factors were prospectively recorded. Results With preventive and preemptive strategies combined for 3 months, CMV replication was detected in 32.6% and CMV disease in 18.1% of patients. Multivariate analysis on risk factors for CMV disease were CMV donor (D)/recipient (R) matching and first month renal function (risk ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.02 [1.01; 1.04]; P=0.011), but not the immunosuppressive regimen (P=0.35). The D+/R- combination increased the risk of CMV disease by a factor of 9 (P < 0.0001) when compared with D-/R- status, and a factor of 3.5 (P < 0.0001) when compared with all CMV-positive recipients. Despite the 50% rate of CMV disease in the D+/R- group, no asymptomatic CMV replication was detected with the preemptive strategy. Conclusions With modern immunosuppression, a sequential quadritherapy with Tac/MMF, and a 3-month CMV prevention strategy, the risk for CMV disease remains close to that with CsA/Aza. A CMV-negative recipient transplanted from a CMV-positive donor (D+/R-) remains a major risk factor, calling for better CMV prophylaxis or matching in negative recipients. Preemptive strategy thus appeared inefficient for this high-risk group. Transplant recipients with altered renal function should also be considered at risk.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 488
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Immunosuppression after renal transplantation
    Neuwirt, Hannes
    Rudnicki, Michael
    Schratzberger, Peter
    Pirklbauer, Markus
    Kronbichler, Andreas
    Mayer, Gert
    MEMO-MAGAZINE OF EUROPEAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 12 (03) : 216 - 221
  • [42] Advances in cytomegalovirus-preventive strategies in solid organ transplantation: defending pre-emptive therapy
    Reischig, Tomas
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2012, 10 (01) : 51 - 61
  • [43] Cytomegalovirus infection in the first year after pediatric kidney transplantation
    Tanne, Corentin
    Roy, Pascal
    Frobert, Emilie
    Duncan, Anita
    Laurent, Audrey
    Cochat, Pierre
    NEPHROLOGIE & THERAPEUTIQUE, 2019, 15 (01): : 44 - 50
  • [44] Incidence and outcomes of cytomegalovirus in pancreas transplantation with steroid-free immunosuppression
    Shah, Ashesh P.
    Chen, Jeanne M.
    Fridell, Jonathan A.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 29 (12) : 1221 - 1229
  • [45] Risk Factors for Progression from Cytomegalovirus Viremia to Cytomegalovirus Disease after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
    Jang, Ji Eun
    Hyun, Shin Young
    Kim, Yun Deok
    Yoon, Sul Hee
    Hwang, Doh Yu
    Kim, Soo Jeong
    Kim, Yuri
    Kim, Jin Seok
    Cheong, June-Won
    Min, Yoo Hong
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (06) : 881 - 886
  • [46] Effect of Cytomegalovirus Viremia on Subclinical Rejection or Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy in Protocol Biopsy at 3 Months in Renal Allograft Recipients Managed by Preemptive Therapy or Antiviral Prophylaxis
    Reischig, Tomas
    Jindra, Pavel
    Hes, Ondrej
    Bouda, Mirko
    Kormunda, Stanislav
    Treska, Vladislav
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 87 (03) : 436 - 444
  • [47] Acute Cytomegalovirus Cholecystitis Following Renal Transplantation
    Drage, M.
    Reid, A.
    Callaghan, C. J.
    Baber, Y.
    Freeman, S.
    Huguet, E.
    Watson, C. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 (05) : 1249 - 1252
  • [48] Cytomegalovirus infection and kidney transplantation- A retrospective study of risk factors and long-term clinical outcome
    Rajendiran, Aravinth Kumar
    Jeyachandran, Dhanapriya
    Gopalakrishnan, Natarajan
    Arumugam, Venkatesh
    Thanigachalam, Dineshkumar
    Ramanathan, Sakthirajan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 15 (02) : 125 - 130
  • [49] High frequency of valganciclovir underdosing for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis after renal transplantation
    Rissling, Olesja
    Naik, Marcel
    Brakemeier, Susanne
    Schmidt, Danilo
    Staeck, Oliver
    Hohberger, Arnim
    Neumayer, Hans-Hellmut
    Budde, Klemens
    CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2018, 11 (04) : 564 - 573
  • [50] Late cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections after kidney transplantation under the preemptive strategy: Risk factors and clinical aspects
    Ono, Gislaine
    Medina Pestana, Jose Osmar
    Aranha Camargo, Luis Fernando
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2019, 21 (02)