Cytomegalovirus risk factors in renal transplantation with modern immunosuppression

被引:38
|
作者
Bataille, S. [1 ]
Moal, V. [1 ]
Gaudart, J. [2 ]
Indreies, M. [1 ]
Purgus, R. [1 ]
Dussol, B. [1 ]
Zandotti, C. [3 ]
Berland, Y. [1 ]
Vacher-Coponat, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Conception, AP HM, Ctr Nephrol & Transplantat Renale, F-13005 Marseille, France
[2] Univ Mediterranee, Fac Med, Serv Sante Publ & Informat Med, Marseille, France
[3] Hop La Timone, AP HM, Virol Lab, Marseille, France
关键词
kidney transplantation; cytomegalovirus; immunosuppressive regimen; renal failure; prophylaxis; preemptive therapy; ORAL GANCICLOVIR; GRAFT-SURVIVAL; INFECTION; KIDNEY; DISEASE; IMPACT; RECIPIENTS; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-3062.2010.00533.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Immunosuppressive regimens have lowered the rate of kidney rejection, but with increasing immunodeficiency-related complications. New cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis also has become available. The impact of these 2 developments on CMV diseases has not been well evaluated. We conducted a randomized trial comparing a drug regimen common in the 1980s, cyclosporin A (CsA) with azathioprine (Aza), with a drug combination used most today, tacrolimus (Tac) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and we analyzed CMV risk factors in kidney transplant patients. Methods The 300 patients included in the trial underwent the same universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. CMV events and risk factors were prospectively recorded. Results With preventive and preemptive strategies combined for 3 months, CMV replication was detected in 32.6% and CMV disease in 18.1% of patients. Multivariate analysis on risk factors for CMV disease were CMV donor (D)/recipient (R) matching and first month renal function (risk ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.02 [1.01; 1.04]; P=0.011), but not the immunosuppressive regimen (P=0.35). The D+/R- combination increased the risk of CMV disease by a factor of 9 (P < 0.0001) when compared with D-/R- status, and a factor of 3.5 (P < 0.0001) when compared with all CMV-positive recipients. Despite the 50% rate of CMV disease in the D+/R- group, no asymptomatic CMV replication was detected with the preemptive strategy. Conclusions With modern immunosuppression, a sequential quadritherapy with Tac/MMF, and a 3-month CMV prevention strategy, the risk for CMV disease remains close to that with CsA/Aza. A CMV-negative recipient transplanted from a CMV-positive donor (D+/R-) remains a major risk factor, calling for better CMV prophylaxis or matching in negative recipients. Preemptive strategy thus appeared inefficient for this high-risk group. Transplant recipients with altered renal function should also be considered at risk.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 488
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Current Prevention Strategies Against Cytomegalovirus in the Studies in Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) Centers
    Danziger-Isakov, L.
    Bucavalas, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 (08) : 1908 - 1911
  • [32] Cytomegalovirus infection post-pancreas-kidney transplantation - results of antiviral prophylaxis in high-risk patients
    Fallatah, Samira M.
    Marquez, Max A.
    Bazerbachi, Fateh
    Schiff, Jeffrey R.
    Cattral, Mark S.
    McGilvray, Ian D.
    Norgate, Andrea
    Selzner, Markus
    Rotstein, Coleman
    Husain, Shahid
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 27 (04) : 503 - 509
  • [33] Preemptive Versus Sequential Prophylactic-Preemptive Treatment Regimens for Cytomegalovirus in Renal Transplantation: Comparison of Treatment Failure and Antiviral Resistance
    van der Beek, Martha T.
    Berger, Stefan P.
    Vossen, Ann C. T. M.
    Brouwer, Caroline S. van der Blij-de
    Press, Rogier R.
    de Fijter, Johan W.
    Claas, Eric C. J.
    Kroes, Aloys C. M.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 89 (03) : 320 - 326
  • [34] A split strategy to prevent cytomegalovirus after kidney transplantation using prophylaxis in serological high-risk patients and a pre-emptive strategy in intermediate-risk patients: Combining the best of two options?
    Hellemans, Rachel
    Wijtvliet, Veerle
    Bergs, Kristof
    Philipse, Ester
    Vleut, Rowena
    Massart, Annick
    Couttenye, Marie-Madeleine
    Matheeussen, Veerle
    Abramowicz, Daniel
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 23 (02)
  • [35] Risk factors and management of hyperuricemia after renal transplantation
    Zi, Xiaoyu
    Zhang, Xi
    Hao, Chuan
    Wang, Zhenxing
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 9
  • [36] Risk factors for lung diseases after renal transplantation
    Pencheva, Ventsislava P.
    Petrova, Daniela S.
    Genov, Diyan K.
    Georgiev, Ognian B.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 20 (12): : 1127 - 1132
  • [37] Risk Factors for the Development of Cytomegalovirus Resistance in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
    Sandkovsky, U.
    Qiu, F.
    Kalil, A. G.
    Florescu, A.
    Wilson, N.
    Manning, C.
    Florescu, D. F.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 50 (10) : 3763 - 3768
  • [38] Prevalence and Risk Factors of Recurrent Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Nafar, Mohsen
    Roshan, Azamolsadat
    Pour-Reza-Gholi, Fatemeh
    Samadian, Fariba
    Ahmadpoor, Pedram
    Samavat, Shiva
    Abbasi, Mohammad Amin
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2014, 8 (03) : 231 - 235
  • [39] Cytomegalovirus Exposure and the Risk of Overall Infection After Kidney Transplantation: A Cohort Study on the Indirect Effects Attributable to Viral Replication
    Rodriguez-Goncer, Isabel
    Ruiz-Ruigomez, Maria
    Lopez-Medrano, Francisco
    Trujillo, Hernando
    Gonzalez, Esther
    Polanco, Natalia
    Gutierrez, Eduardo
    San Juan, Rafael
    Corbella, Laura
    Ruiz-Merlo, Tamara
    Parra, Patricia
    Folgueira, Maria Dolores
    Andres, Amado
    Aguado, Jose Maria
    Fernandez-Ruiz, Mario
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 35
  • [40] Immunosuppression after renal transplantation
    Hannes Neuwirt
    Michael Rudnicki
    Peter Schratzberger
    Markus Pirklbauer
    Andreas Kronbichler
    Gert Mayer
    memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology, 2019, 12 : 216 - 221