Cytomegalovirus risk factors in renal transplantation with modern immunosuppression

被引:38
|
作者
Bataille, S. [1 ]
Moal, V. [1 ]
Gaudart, J. [2 ]
Indreies, M. [1 ]
Purgus, R. [1 ]
Dussol, B. [1 ]
Zandotti, C. [3 ]
Berland, Y. [1 ]
Vacher-Coponat, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Conception, AP HM, Ctr Nephrol & Transplantat Renale, F-13005 Marseille, France
[2] Univ Mediterranee, Fac Med, Serv Sante Publ & Informat Med, Marseille, France
[3] Hop La Timone, AP HM, Virol Lab, Marseille, France
关键词
kidney transplantation; cytomegalovirus; immunosuppressive regimen; renal failure; prophylaxis; preemptive therapy; ORAL GANCICLOVIR; GRAFT-SURVIVAL; INFECTION; KIDNEY; DISEASE; IMPACT; RECIPIENTS; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-3062.2010.00533.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Immunosuppressive regimens have lowered the rate of kidney rejection, but with increasing immunodeficiency-related complications. New cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis also has become available. The impact of these 2 developments on CMV diseases has not been well evaluated. We conducted a randomized trial comparing a drug regimen common in the 1980s, cyclosporin A (CsA) with azathioprine (Aza), with a drug combination used most today, tacrolimus (Tac) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and we analyzed CMV risk factors in kidney transplant patients. Methods The 300 patients included in the trial underwent the same universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. CMV events and risk factors were prospectively recorded. Results With preventive and preemptive strategies combined for 3 months, CMV replication was detected in 32.6% and CMV disease in 18.1% of patients. Multivariate analysis on risk factors for CMV disease were CMV donor (D)/recipient (R) matching and first month renal function (risk ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.02 [1.01; 1.04]; P=0.011), but not the immunosuppressive regimen (P=0.35). The D+/R- combination increased the risk of CMV disease by a factor of 9 (P < 0.0001) when compared with D-/R- status, and a factor of 3.5 (P < 0.0001) when compared with all CMV-positive recipients. Despite the 50% rate of CMV disease in the D+/R- group, no asymptomatic CMV replication was detected with the preemptive strategy. Conclusions With modern immunosuppression, a sequential quadritherapy with Tac/MMF, and a 3-month CMV prevention strategy, the risk for CMV disease remains close to that with CsA/Aza. A CMV-negative recipient transplanted from a CMV-positive donor (D+/R-) remains a major risk factor, calling for better CMV prophylaxis or matching in negative recipients. Preemptive strategy thus appeared inefficient for this high-risk group. Transplant recipients with altered renal function should also be considered at risk.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 488
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of cytomegalovirus infection and its consequences in renal transplantation: a decade analysis
    Garcia-Testal, Alicia
    Olaguee Diaz, Pau
    Bonilla Escobar, Berta Angelica
    Jose Criado-Alvarez, Juan
    Sanchez Plumed, Jaime
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2011, 137 (08): : 335 - 339
  • [2] Incidence of cytomegalovirus infection after kidney transplantation in the modern era of immunosuppression: the VINTAGE study
    Hidaka, Sumi
    Tanabe, Kazunari
    Kobayashi, Shuzo
    RENAL FAILURE, 2025, 47 (01)
  • [3] Ganciclovir Transiently Attenuates Murine Cytomegalovirus-Associated Renal Allograft Inflammation
    Shimamura, Masako
    Saunders, Ute
    Rha, Brian
    Guo, Lingling
    Cassady, Kevin A.
    George, James F.
    Britt, William J.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 92 (07) : 759 - 766
  • [4] Revisiting cytomegalovirus serostatus and replication as risk factors for inferior long-term outcomes in the current era of renal transplantation
    Bischof, Nicole
    Wehmeier, Caroline
    Dickenmann, Michael
    Hirt-Minkowski, Patricia
    Amico, Patrizia
    Steiger, Juerg
    Naegele, Klaudia
    Hirsch, Hans H.
    Schaub, Stefan
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 35 (02) : 346 - 356
  • [5] Cytomegalovirus Disease in Renal Allograft Recipients in the Current Immunosuppression Era
    Housawi, Abdulrahman
    Woodman, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2024, 96 (12)
  • [6] Two strategies for prevention of cytomegalovirus infections after liver transplantation
    Simon, Philipp
    Sasse, Max
    Laudi, Sven
    Petroff, David
    Bartels, Michael
    Kaisers, Udo X.
    Bercker, Sven
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (12) : 3412 - 3417
  • [7] Risk Factors for Late-Onset Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease in Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Jamal, Alainna J.
    Husain, Shahid
    Li, Yanhong
    Famure, Olusegun
    Kim, S. Joseph
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 97 (05) : 569 - 575
  • [8] The risk of cytomegalovirus recurrence after kidney transplantation
    Helantera, Ilkka
    Lautenschlager, Irmeli
    Koskinen, Petri
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 24 (12) : 1170 - 1178
  • [9] Valacyclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis reduces the risk of acute renal allograft rejection
    Reischig, T
    Jindra, P
    Mares, J
    Cechura, M
    Svecová, M
    Hes, O
    Opatrny, K
    Treska, V
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (03) : 317 - 324
  • [10] Post-Renal Transplant Cytomegalovirus Infection: Study of Risk Factors
    Kute, V. B.
    Vanikar, A. V.
    Shah, P. R.
    Gumber, M. R.
    Patel, H. V.
    Godara, S. M.
    Munjappa, B. C.
    Sainaresh, V. V.
    Engineer, D. P.
    Jain, S. H.
    Modi, P. R.
    Shah, V. R.
    Trivedi, V. B.
    Trivedi, H. L.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 44 (03) : 706 - 709