A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of volatile organic compounds in airway diseases and their relation to markers of type-2 inflammation

被引:11
|
作者
Ibrahim, Wadah [1 ,2 ]
Natarajan, Sushiladevi [1 ,2 ]
Wilde, Michael [3 ]
Cordell, Rebecca [3 ]
Monks, Paul S. [3 ]
Greening, Neil [1 ,2 ]
Brightling, Christopher E. [1 ,2 ]
Evans, Rachael [1 ,2 ]
Siddiqui, Salman [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Glenfield Hosp, Leicester NIHR Biomed Res Ctr Resp Theme, Leicester, Leics, England
[2] Univ Leicester, Coll Life Sci, Dept Resp Sci, Leicester, Leics, England
[3] Univ Leicester, Dept Chem, Leicester, Leics, England
关键词
OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; MULTIVARIABLE PREDICTION MODEL; ELECTRONIC NOSE; EXHALED BREATH; COPD PATIENTS; INDIVIDUAL PROGNOSIS; MASS-SPECTROMETRY; REAL-TIME; ASTHMA; DISCRIMINATION;
D O I
10.1183/23120541.00030-2021
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Asthma and COPD continue to cause considerable diagnostic and treatment stratification challenges. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been proposed as feasible diagnostic and monitoring biomarkers in airway diseases. Aims To 1) conduct a systematic review evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of VOCs in diagnosing airway diseases; 2) understand the relationship between reported VOCs and biomarkers of type-2 inflammation; 3) assess the standardisation of reporting according to STARD and TRIPOD criteria; 4) review current methods of breath sampling and analysis. Methods A PRISMA-oriented systematic search was conducted (January 1997 to December 2020). Search terms included: "asthma", "volatile organic compound(s)", "VOC" and "COPD". Two independent reviewers examined the extracted titles against review objectives. Results 44 full-text papers were included; 40/44 studies were cross-sectional and four studies were interventional in design; 17/44 studies used sensor-array technologies (e.g. eNose). Cross-study comparison was not possible across identified studies due to the heterogeneity in design. The commonest airway diseases differentiating VOCs belonged to carbonyl-containing classes (i.e. aldehydes, esters and ketones) and hydrocarbons (i.e. alkanes and alkenes). Although individual markers that are associated with clinical biomarkers of type-2 inflammation were recognised (i.e. ethane and 3,7-dimethylnonane for asthma and alpha-methylstyrene and decane for COPD), these were not consistently identified across studies. Only 3/44 reported following STARD or TRIPOD criteria for diagnostic accuracy and multivariate reporting, respectively. Conclusions Breath VOCs show promise as diagnostic biomarkers of airway diseases and for type-2 inflammation profiling. However, future studies should focus on transparent reporting of diagnostic accuracy and multivariate models and continue to focus on chemical identification of volatile metabolites.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of breath tests based on volatile organic compounds for cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jin, Ming-Jun
    Li, En-Min
    Xu, Li-Yan
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2025, 136
  • [2] Diagnostic accuracy of markers for detection of airway eosinophilia in asthma: A systematic review
    Korevaar, Daniel A.
    Westerhof, Guus A.
    Spijker, Rene
    Sterk, Peter J.
    Bel, Elisabeth H.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2014, 44
  • [3] The scent of human diseases: a review on specific volatile organic compounds as diagnostic biomarkers
    Buljubasic, Fanis
    Buchbauer, Gerhard
    FLAVOUR AND FRAGRANCE JOURNAL, 2015, 30 (01) : 5 - 25
  • [4] Clinical use of exhaled volatile organic compounds in pulmonary diseases: a systematic review
    van de Kant, Kim D. G.
    van der Sande, Linda J. T. M.
    Jobsis, Quirijn
    van Schayck, Onno C. P.
    Dompeling, Edward
    RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2012, 13
  • [5] Are Volatile Organic Compounds Accurate Markers in the Assessment of Colorectal Cancer and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases? A Review
    Vernia, Filippo
    Valvano, Marco
    Fabiani, Stefano
    Stefanelli, Gianpiero
    Longo, Salvatore
    Viscido, Angelo
    Latella, Giovanni
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [6] Diagnostic Ability of Volatile Organic Compounds in Digestive Cancer: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Hang
    Mou, Yi
    Hu, Bing
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 16
  • [7] Clinical use of exhaled volatile organic compounds in pulmonary diseases: a systematic review
    Kim DG van de Kant
    Linda JTM van der Sande
    Quirijn Jöbsis
    Onno CP van Schayck
    Edward Dompeling
    Respiratory Research, 13
  • [8] Exhaled volatile organic compounds associated with risk factors for obstructive pulmonary diseases: a systematic review
    Khamas, Shahriyar Shahbazi
    Bahmani, Amir Hossein Alizadeh
    Vijverberg, Susanne J. H.
    Brinkman, Paul
    Maitland-van der Zee, Anke H.
    ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, 2023, 9 (04)
  • [9] Breath Analysis: A Systematic Review of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Pleural Mesothelioma
    Catino, Annamaria
    de Gennaro, Gianluigi
    Di Gilio, Alessia
    Facchini, Laura
    Galetta, Domenico
    Palmisani, Jolanda
    Porcelli, Francesca
    Varesano, Niccolo
    CANCERS, 2019, 11 (06):
  • [10] Diagnostic Application of Volatile Organic Compounds as Potential Biomarkers for Detecting Digestive Neoplasia: A Systematic Review
    Dima, Augustin Catalin
    Balaban, Daniel Vasile
    Dima, Alina
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (12)