Environmental risk of nickel in aquatic Arctic ecosystems

被引:17
作者
Gauthier, Patrick T. [1 ]
Blewett, Tamzin A. [1 ]
Garman, Emily R. [2 ]
Schlekat, Christian E. [2 ]
Middleton, Elizabeth T. [2 ]
Suominen, Emily [3 ]
Cremazy, Anne [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Biol Sci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2M9, Canada
[2] NiPERA, Durham, NC 27713 USA
[3] Univ New Brunswick, Dept Biol Sci, 100 Tucker Pk Rd, St John, NB E2L 4L5, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Arctic; Nickel; Toxicity; Bioavailability; Climate change; Water quality; DISSOLVED ORGANIC-MATTER; EARLY-LIFE STAGES; HEAVY-METALS; TRACE-ELEMENTS; FRESH-WATER; OCEAN ACIDIFICATION; SEASONAL-VARIATIONS; DAPHNIA-MAGNA; SEA-URCHIN; RELATIVE SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148921
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Arctic faces many environmental challenges, including the continued exploitation of its mineral resources such as nickel (Ni). The responsible development of Ni mining in the Arctic requires establishing a risk assessment framework that accounts for the specificities of this unique region. We set out to conduct preliminary assessments of Ni exposure and effects in aquatic Arctic ecosystems. Our analysis of Ni source and transport processes in the Arctic suggests that fresh, estuarine, coastal, and marine waters are potential Ni-receiving environments, with both pelagic and benthic communities being at risk of exposure. Environmental concentrations of Ni show that sites with elevated Ni concentrations are located near Ni mining operations in freshwater environments, but there is a lack of data for coastal and estuarine environments near such operations. Nickel bioavailability in Arctic freshwaters seems to be mainly driven by dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations with bioavailability being the highest in the High Arctic, where DOC levels are the lowest. However, this assessment is based on bioavailability models developed from non-Arctic species. At present, the lack of chronic Ni toxicity data on Arctic species constitutes the greatest hurdle toward the development of Ni quality standards in this region. Although there are some indications that polar organisms may not be more sensitive to contaminants than non-Arctic species, biological adaptations necessary for life in polar environments may have led to differences in species sensitivities, and this must be addressed in risk assessment frameworks. Finally, Ni polar risk assessment is further complicated by climate change, which affects the Arctic at a faster rate than the rest of the world. Herein we discuss the source, fate, and toxicity of Ni in Arctic aquatic environments, and discuss how climate change effects (e.g., permafrost thawing, increased precipitation, and warming) will influence risk assessments of Ni in the Arctic. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrated environmental risk assessment of rare earth elements mixture on aquatic ecosystems
    Lachaux, Nicolas
    Cossu-Leguille, Carole
    Poirier, Laurence
    Gross, Elisabeth Maria
    Giamberini, Laure
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [2] The fate of mercury in Arctic terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, a review
    Douglas, Thomas A.
    Loseto, Lisa L.
    Macdonald, Robie W.
    Outridge, Peter
    Dommergue, Aurelien
    Poulain, Alexandre
    Amyot, Marc
    Barkay, Tamar
    Berg, Torunn
    Chetelat, John
    Constant, Philippe
    Evans, Marlene
    Ferrari, Christophe
    Gantner, Nikolaus
    Johnson, Matthew S.
    Kirk, Jane
    Kroer, Niels
    Larose, Catherine
    Lean, David
    Nielsen, Torkel Gissel
    Poissant, Laurier
    Rognerud, Sigurd
    Skov, Henrik
    Sorensen, Soren
    Wang, Feiuye
    Wilson, Simon
    Zdanowicz, Christian M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 9 (04) : 321 - 355
  • [3] Negatives and Positives: Contaminants and Other Stressors in Aquatic Ecosystems
    Chapman, Peter M.
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 100 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [4] Reviews and syntheses: Effects of permafrost thaw on Arctic aquatic ecosystems
    Vonk, J. E.
    Tank, S. E.
    Bowden, W. B.
    Laurion, I.
    Vincent, W. F.
    Alekseychik, P.
    Amyot, M.
    Billet, M. F.
    Canario, J.
    Cory, R. M.
    Deshpande, B. N.
    Helbig, M.
    Jammet, M.
    Karlsson, J.
    Larouche, J.
    MacMillan, G.
    Rautio, M.
    Anthony, K. M. Walter
    Wickland, K. P.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2015, 12 (23) : 7129 - 7167
  • [5] Methylmercury biogeochemistry: a review with special reference to Arctic aquatic ecosystems
    Lehnherr, Igor
    ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS, 2014, 22 (03): : 229 - 243
  • [6] Environmental control of diatom community size structure varies across aquatic ecosystems
    Finkel, Zoe V.
    Vaillancourt, Colin Jacob
    Irwin, Andrew J.
    Reavie, Euan D.
    Smol, John P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 276 (1662) : 1627 - 1634
  • [7] The environmental effects of microplastics on aquatic ecosystems
    Ha, Jiwon
    Yeo, Min-Kyeong
    MOLECULAR & CELLULAR TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 14 (04) : 353 - 359
  • [8] Environmental Risk Assessment of Silver Nanoparticles in Aquatic Ecosystems Using Fuzzy Logic
    Ramirez, Rosember
    Marti, Vicenc
    Darbra, Rosa Mari
    WATER, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [9] A Multilevel Risk Assessment Framework for Nanoplastics in Aquatic Ecosystems
    Venancio, Catia
    Oliveira, Miguel
    WATER, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [10] Palladium Nanoparticles: Is There a Risk for Aquatic Ecosystems?
    Luederwald, Simon
    Seitz, Frank
    Seisenbaeva, Gulaim A.
    Kessler, Vadim G.
    Schulz, Ralf
    Bundschuh, Mirco
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2016, 97 (02) : 153 - 158