Energy efficient offloading strategy in fog-cloud environment for IoT applications

被引:56
作者
Adhikari, Mainak [1 ]
Gianey, Hemant [1 ]
机构
[1] Thapar Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Patalia, Punjab, India
关键词
IoT application; Multi-objective optimization; Fog computing; Cloud computing; Quality-of-Service; Computational offloading;
D O I
10.1016/j.iot.2019.100053
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Nowadays, cloud computing leverages the capability of Internet-of-Things (IoT) applications by providing computing resources as a form of virtual machine (VM) instances. However, the Cloud data center consumes a large amount of energy while transmitting and computing the IoT applications which lead to a high carbon footprint. On the other hand, the Fog nodes provide various cloud services at the edge of the network which can run the IoT applications locally with minimum energy consumption and delay. Due to the limited resource capacity, the Fog nodes are not suitable for processing the resource-intensive IoT applications. To address these challenges, in this paper, we build sustainable infrastructure in Fog-Cloud environment for processing delay-intensive and resource-intensive applications with an optimal task offloading strategy. The proposed offloading strategy uses Firefly algorithm for finding an optimal computing device based on two Quality-of-Service (QoS) parameters such as energy consumption and computational time. The main objectives of this strategy are to minimize the computational time and the energy consumption of the IoT applications with minimum delay. The effect of the control parameters of the Firefly technique is investigated thoroughly. Through comparisons, we show that the proposed method performs better than the existing ones in terms of various performance metrics including computational time, energy consumption, CO2 emission, and Temperature emission. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison [J].
Blum, C ;
Roli, A .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2003, 35 (03) :268-308
[2]  
Bonomi F., 2012, Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on Mobile cloud computing, P13, DOI [DOI 10.1145/2342509.2342513, 10.1145/2342509.2342513]
[3]   QoS-Aware Deployment of IoT Applications Through the Fog [J].
Brogi, Antonio ;
Forti, Stefano .
IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2017, 4 (05) :1185-1192
[4]   Fog and IoT: An Overview of Research Opportunities [J].
Chiang, Mung ;
Zhang, Tao .
IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2016, 3 (06) :854-864
[5]  
Craciunescu R, 2015, 2015 49TH ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS AND COMPUTERS, P459, DOI 10.1109/ACSSC.2015.7421170
[6]  
Deb K, 2001, WIL INT S SYS OPT
[7]  
Fricker C., 2016, ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems (TOMPECS), V1, P16
[8]   FemtoClouds: Leveraging Mobile Devices to Provide Cloud Service at the Edge [J].
Habak, Karim ;
Ammar, Mostafa ;
Harras, Khaled A. ;
Zegura, Ellen .
2015 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING, 2015, :9-16
[9]   Aura: An incentive-driven ad-hoc IoT cloud framework for proximal mobile computation offloading [J].
Hasan, Ragib ;
Hossain, Mahmud ;
Khan, Rasib .
FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2018, 86 :821-835
[10]   Multitier Fog Computing With Large-Scale IoT Data Analytics for Smart Cities [J].
He, Jianhua ;
Wei, Jian ;
Chen, Kai ;
Tang, Zuoyin ;
Zhou, Yi ;
Zhang, Yan .
IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2018, 5 (02) :677-686