Host Genetics of Response to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome in Sows: Reproductive Performance

被引:4
|
作者
Hickmann, Felipe M. W. [1 ,2 ]
Braccini Neto, Jose [2 ]
Kramer, Luke M. [1 ]
Huang, Yijian [3 ]
Gray, Kent A. . [3 ]
Dekkers, Jack C. M. [1 ]
Sanglard, Leticia P. [1 ]
Serao, Nick V. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Anim Sci, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Smithfield Premium Genet, Rose Hill, NC USA
关键词
disease outbreak; genomics; GWAS; PRRS; QTL; reproduction; SNP; swine; SYNDROME VIRUS-INFECTION; COMMERCIAL SOWS; PIGS; SUSCEPTIBILITY; IDENTIFICATION; OUTBREAK; TRAITS;
D O I
10.3389/fgene.2021.707870
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) is historically the most economically important swine disease worldwide that severely affects the reproductive performance of sows. However, little is still known about the genetic basis of reproductive performance in purebred herds during a PRRS outbreak through the comparison of maternal and terminal breeds. Thus, the objective of this work was to explore the host genetics of response to PRRS in purebred sows from two breeds. Reproductive data included 2546 Duroc and 2522 Landrace litters from 894 and 813 purebred sows, respectively, which had high-density genotype data available (29,799 single nucleotide polymorphisms; SNPs). The data were split into pre-PRRS, PRRS, and post-PRRS phases based on standardized farrow-year-week estimates. Heritability estimates for reproductive traits were low to moderate (<= 0.20) for Duroc and Landrace across PRRS phases. On the other hand, genetic correlations of reproductive traits between PRRS phases were overall moderate to high for both breeds. Several associations between MARC0034894, a candidate SNP for response to PRRS, with reproductive performance were identified (P-value < 0.05). Genomic analyses detected few QTL for reproductive performance across all phases, most explaining a small percentage of the additive genetic variance (<= 8.2%, averaging 2.1%), indicating that these traits are highly polygenic. None of the identified QTL within a breed and trait overlapped between PRRS phases. Overall, our results indicate that Duroc sows are phenotypically more resilient to PRRS than Landrace sows, with a similar return to PRRS-free performance between breeds for most reproductive traits. Genomic prediction results indicate that genomic selection for improved reproductive performance under a PRRS outbreak is possible, especially in Landrace sows, by training markers using data from PRRS-challenged sows. On the other hand, the high genetic correlations with reproductive traits between PRRS phases suggest that selection for improved reproductive performance in a clean environment could improve performance during PRRS, but with limited efficiency due to their low heritability estimates. Thus, we hypothesize that an indicator trait that could be indirectly selected to increase the response to selection for these traits would be desirable and would also improve the reproductive performance of sows during a PRRS outbreak.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Immunological responses of swine to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection
    Czyzewska, Ewelina
    Dors, Arkadiusz
    Pomorska-Mol, Malgorzata
    MEDYCYNA WETERYNARYJNA-VETERINARY MEDICINE-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2013, 69 (09): : 526 - 530
  • [32] Prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) is not a host for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
    Baker, Rodney B.
    Yu, Wanqin
    Fuentes, Martha
    Johnson, Craig R.
    Peterson, LaRae
    Rossow, Kurt
    Daniels, C. Scanlon
    Daniels, Angela M.
    Polson, Dale
    Murtaugh, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF SWINE HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2007, 15 (01): : 22 - 29
  • [33] Comparison of pathogenicity and host responses of emerging porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus variants in piglets
    Zhang, Wenli
    Wang, Xinrong
    Zhang, He
    Pan, Yu
    Ma, Wenjie
    Xu, Yunfei
    Tian, Zhijun
    Xia, Changyou
    Fu, Lizhi
    Wang, Yue
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 2024, 98 (11)
  • [34] Effects of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection on the performance of commercial sows and gilts of different parities and genetic lines
    Lewis, C. R. G.
    Torremorell, M.
    Bishop, S. C.
    JOURNAL OF SWINE HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 (03): : 140 - 147
  • [35] Effects of stress on performance and the immune response in pigs infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
    Sutherland, M.
    Niekamp, S.
    Van Alstine, W.
    Salak-Johnson, J.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2005, 88 : 245 - 245
  • [36] Emergence of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome in Sweden: Detection, Response and Eradication
    Carlsson, U.
    Wallgren, P.
    Renstrom, L. H. M.
    Lindberg, A.
    Eriksson, H.
    Thoren, P.
    Eliasson-Selling, L.
    Lundeheim, N.
    Norregard, E.
    Thorn, C.
    Elvander, M.
    TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2009, 56 (04) : 121 - 131
  • [37] AN OUTBREAK OF PORCINE REPRODUCTIVE AND RESPIRATORY SYNDROME IN JAPAN
    KUWAHARA, H
    NUNOYA, T
    TAJIMA, M
    KATO, A
    SAMEJIMA, T
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 1994, 56 (05): : 901 - 909
  • [38] Hypermutations in porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus
    Dong, Jianguo
    Rao, Dan
    Ding, Yushan
    Zhao, Yu
    Zhang, Guangqiang
    Deng, Kaiwei
    Liu, Tao
    Jiao, Fengchao
    Hu, Jing
    Wang, Huanan
    Zhang, Ning
    Zhao, Pandeng
    Leng, Chaoliang
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE VETERINAIRE, 2019, 83 (02): : 104 - 109
  • [39] Pathogenesis of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
    Chand, Ranjni J.
    Trible, Benjamin R.
    Rowland, Raymond R. R.
    CURRENT OPINION IN VIROLOGY, 2012, 2 (03) : 256 - 263
  • [40] Use of reverse genetics to develop a novel marker porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
    Lin, Tao
    Li, Xiangrui
    Yao, Huochun
    Wei, Zuzhang
    Tan, Feifei
    Liu, Runxia
    Sun, Lichang
    Zhang, Rong
    Li, Wenliang
    Lu, Jiaqi
    Tong, Guangzhi
    Yuan, Shishan
    VIRUS GENES, 2012, 45 (03) : 548 - 555