Can exporting resolve overcapacity? Evidence from Chinese steel companies

被引:19
|
作者
Dai, Xiaoyong [1 ]
Zhao, Zhiqi [2 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Business, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Overcapacity; Export; Chinese steel companies; Trade disputes; CAPACITY UTILIZATION; DOMESTIC DEMAND; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; DYNAMICS; POVERTY; IMPACT; TRADE; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105578
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The global overcapacity in the steel sector has triggered growing trade disputes and tensions worldwide. However, it is controversial whether steel overcapacity should be a systemic trade concern and if exporting can resolve steel overcapacity. This paper investigated the nexus between exporting and overcapacity at the firm level. We estimate a measure of capacity utilization (CU) for a large sample of Chinese steel companies. By statistically comparing the estimated CU distributions, we found that, before exporting, exporters have more excess capacity than non-exporters. Moreover, we found that exporting has no significant impact on a firm's CU ex-post. As steel overcapacity has become a global issue, the weak demand in the export markets is far from being adequate to absorb excess capacity and improve the capacity utilization of exporting firms. Our study implies that encouraging export cannot act as a strategy to resolve overcapacity, although China's steel production overwhelmingly feeds the country's domestic market.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of carbon emission trading policy on overcapacity of companies: Evidence from China
    Wang, Hai
    Ye, Shuai
    Chen, Hui
    Yin, Junya
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 126
  • [2] Environmental benefit gain from exporting: Evidence from Vietnam
    Tran, Trang My
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2022, 45 (04) : 1081 - 1111
  • [3] Would the market mechanism cause the formation of overcapacity?: Evidence from Chinese listed firms of manufacturing industry
    Dong, Kaiqiang
    Sun, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 79 : 97 - 113
  • [4] ESG and overcapacity governance evidence from Chinese listed firms
    Ou, Dingyu
    Hou, Siyao
    Zhou, Fenfang
    BUSINESS ETHICS THE ENVIRONMENT & RESPONSIBILITY, 2024,
  • [5] Bundling and exporting: Evidence from German SMEs
    Aquilante, Tommaso
    Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 132 : 32 - 44
  • [6] Can ESG ratings promote green total factor productivity? Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies
    Niu, Dengyun
    Wang, Zhihua
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (07)
  • [7] Innovation and exporting: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms
    Caldera, Aida
    REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2010, 146 (04) : 657 - 689
  • [8] Learning by exporting: Evidence from patent citations in China
    Liang, Yousha
    Shi, Kang
    Tao, Hanyi
    Xu, Juanyi
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 150
  • [9] Abatement effect of exporting and environmental regulation stringency: evidence from a natural experiment in China
    Cheng, Ruiqi
    Yuan, Peng
    Li, Hailong
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (09) : 22525 - 22554
  • [10] Firm-Level Investment and Exporting: New Empirical Evidence from Ghana and Tanzania
    Esaku, Stephen
    Krugell, Waldo
    INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2020, 34 (01) : 125 - 143