Social Class, Power, and Selfishness: When and Why Upper and Lower Class Individuals Behave Unethically

被引:263
作者
Dubois, David [1 ]
Rucker, Derek D. [2 ]
Galinsky, Adam D. [3 ]
机构
[1] INSEAD, Dept Mkt, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
[2] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Dept Mkt, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Management, Columbia Business Sch, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
unethical behavior; self-; vs; other-beneficial; agency; communion; power; ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; GOAL PURSUIT; SELF; ORGANIZATIONS; ORIENTATION; INEQUALITY; DISHONESTY; MODERATOR; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1037/pspi0000008
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Are the rich more unethical than the poor? To answer this question, the current research introduces a key conceptual distinction between selfish and unethical behavior. Based on this distinction, the current article offers 2 novel findings that illuminate the relationship between social class and unethical behavior. First, the effects of social class on unethical behavior are not invariant; rather, the effects of social class are moderated by whether unethical behavior benefits the self or others. Replicating past work, social class positively predicted unethical behavior; however, this relationship was only observed when that behavior was self-beneficial. When unethical behavior was performed to benefit others, social class negatively predicted unethical behavior; lower class individuals were more likely than upper class individuals to engage in unethical behavior. Overall, social class predicts people's tendency to behave selfishly, rather than predicting unethical behavior per se. Second, individuals' sense of power drove the effects of social class on unethical behavior. Evidence for this relationship was provided in three forms. First, income, but not education level, predicted unethical behavior. Second, feelings of power mediated the effect of social class on unethical behavior, but feelings of status did not. Third, two distinct manipulations of power produced the same moderation by self-versus-other beneficiary as was found with social class. The current theoretical framework and data both synthesize and help to explain a range of findings in the social class and power literatures.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 449
页数:14
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Fundamental dimensions of social judgment
    Abele, Andrea E.
    Cuddy, Amy J. C.
    Judd, Charles M.
    Yzerbyt, Vincent Y.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 38 (07) : 1063 - 1065
  • [2] Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women
    Adler, NE
    Epel, ES
    Castellazzo, G
    Ickovics, JR
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 19 (06) : 586 - 592
  • [3] Power, optimism, and risk-taking
    Anderson, Cameron
    Galinsky, Adam D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 36 (04) : 511 - 536
  • [4] The Local-Ladder Effect: Social Status and Subjective Well-Being
    Anderson, Cameron
    Kraus, Michael W.
    Galinsky, Adam D.
    Keltner, Dacher
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (07) : 764 - 771
  • [5] The Personal Sense of Power
    Anderson, Cameron
    John, Oliver P.
    Keltner, Dacher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2012, 80 (02) : 313 - 344
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1968, Leviathan
  • [7] [Anonymous], MERRIAM WEBSTERS ONL
  • [8] [Anonymous], MULTIVARIAT IN PRESS
  • [9] Ayal Shahar., 2011, The Social Psychology of Morality: Exploring the Causes of Good and Evil, DOI DOI 10.1037/13091-008
  • [10] Bakan D., 1966, The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man