Single-center retrospective review of ultrasound-accelerated versus traditional catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis

被引:14
|
作者
Lu, Tony [1 ]
Loh, Thomas M. [1 ]
El-Sayed, Hosam F. [2 ]
Davies, Mark G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Houston Methodist Hosp, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vasc Ctr, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, 6550 Fannin St,Smith Tower,Suite 1401, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Dis & Surg, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Surg, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
EKOS; CDT; thrombolysis; ultrasound; outcomes; DVT; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; VEIN THROMBOSIS; OUTCOMES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1177/1708538117702061
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective: Systemic anticoagulation remains the standard for acute lower extremity (LE) deep venous thrombosis (DVT), but growing interest in catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and its potential to reduce the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) has led to advent of ultrasound-accelerated CDT (US-CDT). Few studies to date have examined the outcomes of US-CDT against traditional CDT (T-CDT). Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center review of all patients treated for acute LE DVT over a five-year period with either US-and T-CDT. Patients were stratified based on demographics, presentation, co-morbidities, risk factors, and peri-procedural data. Results: Seventy-six limbs in 67 patients were treated; 51 limbs in 42 patients were treated with US-CDT, and 25 limbs in 25 patients were treated with T-CDT. Adjuncts include: pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (n = 28 vs. 20, p = 0.04), angioplasty (n = 22 vs. 18, p = 0.11), stenting (n = 30 vs. 6, p <= 0.001), and IVC filter insertion (n = 5 vs. 0, p = 0.07). Mean lysis times were 21 +/- 1.7 and 24 +/- 1.8 h for US-and T-CDT, respectively (p = 0.26). Thirty (25 ultrasound, 5 traditional) limbs had complete lysis. Thirty-one (22 ultrasound, 9 traditional) limbs had incomplete lysis. Fifteen (4 ultrasound, 11 traditional) limbs had ineffective lysis (p = 0.002 in favor of ultrasound). Four patients (3 US-CDT, 1 T-CDT) had recurrent ipsilateral thrombosis within 30 days (p = 0.60). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, there were no significant difference between primary patency, primary-assisted patency, secondary patency, re-thrombosis, and recurrent symptoms at 6, 12, and 24 months. Conclusion: US-CDT does not significantly improve mid-term patencies but results in greater acute clot burden reduction in patients with acute LE DVTs compared to T-CDT, which may be beneficial in reducing the long-term incidence of PTS.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 532
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Ultrasound-Accelerated Versus Multi-Hole Infusion Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Acute Limb Ischemia
    Chait, Jesse
    Aurshina, Afsha
    Marks, Natalie
    Hingorani, Anil
    Ascher, Enrico
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 53 (07) : 558 - 562
  • [42] Evaluation of Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy via the AngioJet System Combined with Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Yin, Shi-Wu
    Guo, Li-Wen
    Bian, Lu
    Xiang, Ting-Miao
    Pan, Sheng-Quan
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 65 : 66 - 71
  • [43] A case-controlled study on AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis
    Zhu, Jun
    Ni, Cai-Fang
    Dai, Zhen-Yu
    Yao, Li-Zheng
    Li, Wen-Hui
    VASCULAR, 2020, 28 (02) : 177 - 182
  • [44] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis with a Continuous Infusion of Low-Dose Urokinase for Non-Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Lower Extremity
    Gao, Binbin
    Zhang, Jingyong
    Wu, Xuejun
    Han, Zonglin
    Zhou, Hua
    Dong, Dianning
    Jin, Xing
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 12 (01) : 97 - 106
  • [45] A Prospective Randomized Trial of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis With Additional Balloon Dilatation for Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Single-Center Experience
    Xiaoqin Zhang
    Qingshuai Ren
    Xuemei Jiang
    Jianming Sun
    Jianping Gong
    Bo Tang
    Yikuan Chen
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2014, 37 : 958 - 968
  • [46] Ultrasound-Assisted Versus Conventional Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis
    Engelberger, Rolf P.
    Spirk, David
    Willenberg, Torsten
    Alatri, Adriano
    Do, Dai-Do
    Baumgartner, Iris
    Kucher, Nils
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (01)
  • [47] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Protocols for Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Lower Extremities-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Duarte-Gamas, Luis
    Jacome, Filipa
    Dias, Lara Romana
    Rocha-Neves, Joao
    Yeung, Kak K.
    Baekgaard, Niels
    Dias-Neto, Marina
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2024, 124 (02) : 89 - 104
  • [48] Suitability for catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis according to various international consensus guidelines
    Stefanescu, Adrian
    Alatri, Adriano
    Periard, Daniel
    Kucher, Nils
    Mazzolai, Lucia
    Engelberger, Rolf P.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2018, 165 : 112 - 115
  • [49] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Versus Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy for Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Mahmoud, Osman
    Vikatmaa, Pirkka
    Rasanen, Jari
    Peltola, Erno
    Sihvo, Eero
    Vikatmaa, Leena
    Lappalainen, Kimmo
    Venermo, Maarit
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 51 : 246 - 253
  • [50] Quantitation of Venous Clot Lysis With D-Dimer Assay During Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Zou, Junjie
    Jiao, Yuanyong
    Jiang, Jun
    Yang, Hongyu
    Ma, Hao
    Zhang, Xiwei
    Ye, Qin
    Wang, Hong
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2016, 101 (9-10) : 487 - 491