Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications

被引:696
作者
Guillera-Arroita, Gurutzeta [1 ]
Lahoz-Monfort, Jose J. [1 ]
Elith, Jane [1 ]
Gordon, Ascelin [2 ]
Kujala, Heini [1 ]
Lentini, Pia E. [1 ]
McCarthy, Michael A. [1 ]
Tingley, Reid [1 ]
Wintle, Brendan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Bot, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] RMIT Univ, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
来源
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY | 2015年 / 24卷 / 03期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Ecological niche model; habitat model; imperfect detection; presence-absence; presence-background; presence-only; prevalence; sampling bias; PRESENCE-ONLY DATA; POINT PROCESS MODELS; IMPERFECT DETECTION; SELECTING THRESHOLDS; OCCUPANCY; ABSENCE; CONSERVATION; PREDICTION; MAXENT; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/geb.12268
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Species distribution models (SDMs) are used to inform a range of ecological, biogeographical and conservation applications. However, users often underestimate the strong links between data type, model output and suitability for end-use. We synthesize current knowledge and provide a simple framework that summarizes how interactions between data type and the sampling process (i.e. imperfect detection and sampling bias) determine the quantity that is estimated by a SDM. We then draw upon the published literature and simulations to illustrate and evaluate the information needs of the most common ecological, biogeographical and conservation applications of SDM outputs. We find that, while predictions of models fitted to the most commonly available observational data (presence records) suffice for some applications, others require estimates of occurrence probabilities, which are unattainable without reliable absence records. Our literature review and simulations reveal that, while converting continuous SDM outputs into categories of assumed presence or absence is common practice, it is seldom clearly justified by the application's objective and it usually degrades inference. Matching SDMs to the needs of particular applications is critical to avoid poor scientific inference and management outcomes. This paper aims to help modellers and users assess whether their intended SDM outputs are indeed fit for purpose.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 292
页数:17
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] LINKING LANDSCAPE DATA WITH POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS - MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR THE HELMETED HONEYEATER LICHENOSTOMUS MELANOPS CASSIDIX
    AKCAKAYA, HR
    MCCARTHY, MA
    PEARCE, JL
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1995, 73 (02) : 169 - 176
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, ENCYCL BIODIVERS
  • [3] How well does presence-only-based species distribution modelling predict assemblage diversity? A case study of the Tenerife flora
    Aranda, Silvia C.
    Lobo, Jorge M.
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2011, 34 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [4] Advances and applications of occupancymodels
    Bailey, Larissa L.
    MacKenzie, Darryl I.
    Nichols, James D.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2014, 5 (12): : 1269 - 1279
  • [5] Ball I.R., 2009, Marxan and relatives: software for spatial conservation prioritisation
  • [6] Modelling human impacts on the Tasmanian wedge-tailed eagle (Aquila audax fleayi)
    Bekessy, Sarah A.
    Wintle, Brendan A.
    Gordon, Ascelin
    Fox, Julian C.
    Chisholm, Ryan
    Brown, Bill
    Regan, Tracey
    Mooney, Nick
    Read, Steve M.
    Burgman, Mark A.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (11) : 2438 - 2448
  • [7] BIOCLIM: the first species distribution modelling package, its early applications and relevance to most current MAXENT studies
    Booth, Trevor H.
    Nix, Henry A.
    Busby, John R.
    Hutchinson, Michael F.
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2014, 20 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [8] BUSBY J R, 1991, Plant Protection Quarterly, V6, P8
  • [9] Stacking species distribution models and adjusting bias by linking them to macroecological models
    Calabrese, Justin M.
    Certain, Gregoire
    Kraan, Casper
    Dormann, Carsten F.
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2014, 23 (01): : 99 - 112
  • [10] A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection
    Camm, JD
    Polasky, S
    Solow, A
    Csuti, B
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1996, 78 (03) : 353 - 355