Fee-for-service payment is not the (main) problem

被引:8
|
作者
Dowd, Bryan E. [1 ]
Laugesen, Miriam J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Policy & Management, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, New York, NY USA
关键词
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; fee-for-service; fees; health care expenditure; Medicare; payment reform; physicians; reimbursement; PRICES; ASSOCIATION; SCHEDULE; PROVIDER; OVERUSE; UPDATE; IMPACT; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/1475-6773.13316
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To understand the effect of physician payment incentives on the allocation of health care resources. Data Sources/Study Setting Review and analysis of the literature on physician payment incentives. Study Design Analysis of current physician payment incentives and several ways to modify those incentives to encourage increased efficiency. Principal Findings Fee-for-service payments can be incorporated into systems that encourage efficient pricing - prices that are close to the provider's marginal cost - by giving consumers information on provider-specific prices and a strong incentive to choose lower cost providers. However, efficient pricing of services ultimately will need to be supplemented by incentives for efficient production of health and functional status. Conclusions The problem with current FFS payment is not paying a fee for each service, per se, but the way in which the fees are determined.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 495
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bundled Payment vs. Fee-for-Service: Impact of Payment Scheme on Performance
    Adida, Elodie
    Mamani, Hamed
    Nassiri, Shima
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 63 (05) : 1606 - 1624
  • [2] Phasing Out Fee-for-Service Payment
    Schroeder, Steven A.
    Frist, William
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (21) : 2029 - 2032
  • [3] Secondary Interpretation of CT Examinations: Frequency and Payment in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Population
    Lu, Michael T.
    Hallett, Travis R.
    Hemingway, Jennifer
    Hughes, Danny R.
    Hoffmann, Udo
    Duszak, Richard
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (09) : 1096 - 1101
  • [4] Shifting Away From Fee-For-Service: Alternative Approaches to Payment in Gastroenterology
    Patel, Kavita
    Presser, Elise
    George, Meaghan
    McClellan, Mark
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 14 (04) : 497 - 506
  • [5] CASE-MIX OF HOME HEALTH PATIENTS UNDER CAPITATED AND FEE-FOR-SERVICE PAYMENT
    SHAUGHNESSY, PW
    SCHLENKER, RE
    HITTLE, DF
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 1995, 30 (01) : 79 - 113
  • [6] A game theoretic setting of capitation versus fee-for-service payment systems
    Koenecke, Allison
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (10):
  • [7] Quality of Diabetes Care in Blended Fee-for-Service and Blended Capitation Payment Systems
    Bamimore, Mary Aderayo
    Devlin, Rose Anne
    Zaric, Gregory S.
    Garg, Amit X.
    Sarma, Sisira
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2021, 45 (03) : 261 - +
  • [9] Fee-For-Service, While Much Maligned, Remains The Dominant Payment Method For Physician Visits
    Zuvekas, Samuel H.
    Cohen, Joel W.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2016, 35 (03) : 411 - 414
  • [10] The National Physician Payment Commission Recommendation to Eliminate Fee-for-Service Payment: Balancing Risk, Benefit, and Efficiency in Bundling Payment for Care
    Selker, Harry P.
    Kravitz, Richard L.
    Gallagher, Thomas H.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 29 (05) : 698 - 699