Which is the optimal risk stratification system for surgically treated localized primary GIST? Comparison of three contemporary prognostic criteria in 171 tumors and a proposal for a modified armed forces institute of pathology risk criteria

被引:103
作者
Goh, Brian K. P. [1 ]
Chow, Pierce K. H. [1 ,2 ]
Yap, Wai-Ming [3 ]
Kesavan, Sittampalam M. [3 ]
Song, In-Chin [4 ]
Paul, Pradeep G. [5 ]
Ooi, Boon-Swee [6 ]
Chung, Yaw-Fui A. [1 ,6 ]
Wong, Wai-Keong [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Singapore 169608, Singapore
[2] Duke Natl Univ, Singapore Grad Med Sch, Singapore 169547, Singapore
[3] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Singapore 169608, Singapore
[4] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Expt Surg, Singapore 169608, Singapore
[5] Minist Hlth, Clin Trials & Epidemiol Res Unit, Singapore 169039, Singapore
[6] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Singapore 169608, Singapore
关键词
gastrointestinal stromal tumor; GIST; risk criteria; prognosis; staging; surgery;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-008-9969-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This study aims to validate and compare the performance of the National Institute of Health (NIH) criteria, Huang modified NIH criteria, and Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) risk criteria for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in a large series of localized primary GISTs surgically treated at a single institution to determine the ideal risk stratification system for GIST. Methods: The clinicopathological features of 171 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for GISTs were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the prognostic value of the three risk criteria by analyzing the discriminatory ability linear trend, homogeneity, monotonicity of gradients, and Akaike information criteria. Results: The median actuarial recurrence-free survival (RFS) for all 171 patients was 70%. On multivariate analyses, size > 10 cm, mitotic count > 5/50 high-power field, tumor necrosis, and serosal involvement were independent prognostic factors of RFS. All three risk criteria demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the recurrence rate, median actuarial RFS, actuarial 5-year RFS, and tumor-specific death across the different stages. Comparison of the various risk-stratification systems demonstrated that our proposed modified AFIP criteria had the best independent predictive value of RFS when compared with the other systems. Conclusion: The NIH, modified NIH, and AFIP criteria are useful in the prognostication of GIST, and the AFIP risk criteria provided the best prognostication among the three systems for primary localized GIST. However, remarkable prognostic heterogeneity exists in the AFIP high-risk category, and with our proposed modification, this system provides the most accurate prognostic information.
引用
收藏
页码:2153 / 2163
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) - 17 years experience from Mid Trent Region (United Kingdom)
    Ahmed, I.
    Welch, N. T.
    Parsons, S. L.
    [J]. EJSO, 2008, 34 (04): : 445 - 449
  • [2] Gastrointestinal stromal tumours
    Connolly, EM
    Gaffney, E
    Reynolds, JV
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (10) : 1178 - 1186
  • [3] Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors - Recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival
    DeMatteo, RP
    Lewis, JJ
    Leung, D
    Mudan, SS
    Woodruff, JM
    Brennan, MF
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [4] Clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Before and after STI-571
    DeMatteo, RP
    Heinrich, MC
    El-Rifai, WM
    Demetri, G
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2002, 33 (05) : 466 - 477
  • [5] Surgery and imatinib in the management of GIST: Emerging approaches to adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy
    Eisenberg, BL
    Judson, I
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (05) : 465 - 475
  • [6] Prognosis of gastrointestinal smooth-muscle (Stromal) tumors - Dependence on anatomic site
    Emory, TS
    Sobin, LH
    Lukes, L
    Lee, DH
    O'Leary, TJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1999, 23 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [7] Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach
    Fletcher, CDM
    Berman, JJ
    Corless, C
    Gorstein, F
    Lasota, J
    Longley, BJ
    Miettinen, M
    O'Leary, TJ
    Remotti, H
    Rubin, BP
    Shmookler, B
    Sobin, LH
    Weiss, SW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 10 (02) : 81 - 89
  • [8] Pathologic, radiologic and PET scan response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors after neoadjuvant treatment with imatinib mesylate
    Goh, B. K. P.
    Chow, P. K. H.
    Chuah, K. L.
    Yap, W. M.
    Wong, W. K.
    [J]. EJSO, 2006, 32 (09): : 961 - 963
  • [9] Outcome after surgical treatment of suspected gastrointestinal stromal tumors involving the duodenum: Is limited resection appropriate?
    Goh, Brian K. P.
    Chow, Pierce K. H.
    Kesavan, Sittampalam
    Yap, Wai-Ming
    Wong, Wai-Keong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 97 (05) : 388 - 391
  • [10] Outcome following surgical therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors
    Gupta, Maneesh
    Sheppard, Brett C.
    Corless, Christopher L.
    MacDonell, Karen R.
    Blanke, Charles D.
    Billingsley, Kevin G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (08) : 1099 - 1105