Front-End Planning Implementation in Singapore: Status, Importance, and Impact

被引:23
作者
Hwang, Bon-Gang [1 ]
Ho, Jia Wei [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Bldg, Singapore 117566, Singapore
[2] EC Harris Singapore Pte Ltd, Singapore 089315, Singapore
关键词
Project planning; Front-end planning; Best practice; Performance; Construction industry; Project management;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000456
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Front-end planning (FEP) is relatively new to the Singapore construction industry, and its importance is not yet well recognized or emphasized. Technological advancements and continuous fragmentation in the construction industry have resulted in a rapid increase in the complexity of projects, and yet this has not been matched by a concomitant increase in planning efforts. This study aims to identify the importance of FEP and its impact on project outcomes in order to encourage more organizations in Singapore to practice and benefit from it. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire was developed, and the responses from 27 companies were analyzed. The analysis revealed that only about 44% of the responding companies practiced FEP on their projects. In addition, the study quantified the amount of the budget allocated to FEP as well as the level of improvement in project performance achieved by implementing FEP. Once companies recognize their FEP implementation status, they will be at a starting point to understand its importance and impact and will be able to better manage their projects, ultimately allowing the Singapore construction industry to increase its opportunity for producing more successful projects overall. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000456. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 573
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Cho C. S., 2000, THESIS U TEXAS AUSTI
[2]  
Clarke A., 1999, INT J PROJ MANAG, V17, P139
[3]  
Cleland D.I., 2002, PROJECT MANAGEMENT S, V4th
[4]  
Construction Industry Institute (CII), 2003, BMM20034 CII U TEX A
[5]  
Construction Industry Institute (CII), 2006, 213 CII U TEX AUST
[6]  
Construction Industry Institute (CII), 2010, IR1663 CII U TEX AUS
[7]  
Gibson G., 1994, SD105 U TEX AUST CON
[8]  
Gibson G. E, 1994, 391 U TEX AUST CONST
[9]  
Gibson G. E, 1993, SD94 U TEX AUST CONS
[10]  
Gibson G. E, 1995, 392 U TEX AUST CONST