Non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging

被引:87
|
作者
Palaniyappan, Naaventhan [1 ,2 ]
Cox, Eleanor [3 ]
Bradley, Christopher [3 ]
Scott, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Austin, Andrew [4 ]
O'Neill, Richard [5 ]
Ramjas, Greg [5 ]
Travis, Simon [5 ]
White, Hilary [5 ]
Singh, Rajeev [4 ]
Thurley, Peter [4 ]
Guha, Indra Neil [1 ,2 ]
Francis, Susan [3 ]
Aithal, Guruprasad Padur [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, NIHR, Nottingham Digest Dis Biomed Res Unit, Queens Med Ctr Campus,E Floor,West Block,Derby Rd, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Queens Med Ctr Campus,E Floor,West Block,Derby Rd, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Ctr, Nottingham, England
[4] Royal Derby Hosp, Derby, England
[5] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Radiol, Nottingham, England
关键词
Portal hypertension; Hepatic venous pressure gradient; Magnetic resonance imaging; Longitudinal T-1 relaxation time; VENOUS-PRESSURE GRADIENT; HCV-RELATED CIRRHOSIS; ESOPHAGEAL-VARICES; LIVER FIBROSIS; GASTROESOPHAGEAL VARICES; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; COMPENSATED CIRRHOSIS; SAMPLING VARIABILITY; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; BLOOD-FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhep.2016.07.021
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement is currently the only validated technique to accurately evaluate changes in portal pressure. In this study, we evaluate the use of non-contrast quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a surrogate measure of portal pressure. Methods: Thirty patients undergoing HVPG measurement were prospectively recruited. MR parameters of longitudinal relaxation time (T-1), perfusion of the liver and spleen (by arterial spin labelling), and blood flow in the portal, splanchnic and collateral circulation (by phase contrast MRI) were assessed. We estimated the liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score. The correlation of all non-invasive parameters with HVPG was evaluated. Results: The mean (range) HVPG of the patients was 9.8 (1-22) mmHg, and 14 patients (48%) had clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, HVPG 10 mmHg). Liver T1 relaxation time, splenic artery and superior mesenteric artery velocity correlated significantly with HVPG. Using multiple linear regression, liver T1 and splenic artery velocity remained as the two parameters in the multivariate model significantly associated with HVPG (R = 0.90, p <0.001). This correlation was maintained in patients with CSPH (R = 0.85, p <0.001). A validation cohort (n = 10) showed this linear model provided a good prediction of HVPG. LSM and ELF score correlated significantly with HVPG in the whole population but the correlation was absent in CSPH. Conclusions: MR parameters related to both hepatic architecture and splanchnic haemodynamics correlate significantly with HVPG. This proposed model, confirmed in a validation cohort, could replace the invasive HVPG measurement. Lay summary: In patients with cirrhosis, the development and progression of portal hypertension is related to worse outcomes. However, the standard technique of assessing portal pressure is invasive and not widely used in clinical practice. Here, we have studied the use of non-invasive MRI in evaluating portal pressure. The MRI measures of liver architecture and blood flow in the splenic artery correlated well with portal pressure. Therefore, this non-invasive method can potentially be used to assess portal pressure in clinical trials and monitoring treatment in practice. (C) 2016 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1131 / 1139
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Non-Invasive versus Invasive Assessment of Portal Hypertension in Chronic Liver Disease
    Gaspar, Rui
    Macedo, Guilherme
    GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 31 (06) : 377 - 387
  • [32] Non-invasive assessment of vessel morphology and function in tumors by magnetic resonance imaging
    Fabian Kiessling
    Manfred Jugold
    Eva C. Woenne
    Gunnar Brix
    European Radiology, 2007, 17 : 2136 - 2148
  • [33] The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Non-Invasive Assessment of Venofer® Biodistribution in Rats
    Kimberley Span
    Ebel H. E. Pieters
    Wim E. Hennink
    Annette van der Toorn
    Vera Brinks
    Rick M. Dijkhuizen
    Geralda A. F. van Tilborg
    Pharmaceutical Research, 2018, 35
  • [34] Recent advances in non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Davide Ippolito
    Riccardo Inchingolo
    Luigi Grazioli
    Silvia Girolama Drago
    Michele Nardella
    Marco Gatti
    Riccardo Faletti
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2018, (23) : 2413 - 2426
  • [35] Interventional magnetic resonance imaging -: Non-invasive imaging for interventions
    Bücker, A
    Adam, G
    Neuerburg, JM
    Glowinski, A
    Tacke, J
    Günther, RW
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (02): : 105 - 114
  • [36] A non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging-based model predicts portal venous pressure
    Zhang, Qian Wen
    Wang, Yi
    Wang, Jian
    Zhao, Hong Bo
    Yu, Hong
    Liu, Shi Yuan
    Zeng, Xin
    Chen, Qi
    Hu, Zhi Qian
    Guo, Wen Yuan
    Fu, Zhi Ren
    Ding, Guo Shan
    Shi, Xue Yin
    Xie, Wei Fen
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2016, 17 (03) : 175 - 185
  • [37] Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging
    Brookes, JAS
    HallCraggs, MA
    Sams, VR
    Lees, WR
    LANCET, 1996, 348 (9035): : 1139 - 1141
  • [38] Non-invasive evaluation of portal hypertension using ultrasound elastography
    Berzigotti, Annalisa
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 67 (02) : 399 - 411
  • [39] Invasive and non-invasive diagnosis of cirrhosis and portal hypertension
    Moon Young Kim
    Woo Kyoung Jeong
    Soon Koo Baik
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, (15) : 4300 - 4315
  • [40] Non-invasive assessment of liver disease in rats using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study
    Hoy, Anna M.
    McDonald, Natasha
    Lennen, Ross J.
    Milanesi, Matteo
    Herlihy, Amy H.
    Kendall, Timothy J.
    Mungall, William
    Gyngell, Michael
    Banerjee, Rajarshi
    Janiczek, Robert L.
    Murphy, Philip S.
    Jansen, Maurits A.
    Fallowfield, Jonathan A.
    BIOLOGY OPEN, 2018, 7 (07):