A meta-classifier for detecting prostate cancer by quantitative integration of in vivo magnetic resonance Spectroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging

被引:0
|
作者
Viswanath, Satish [1 ]
Tiwari, Pallavi [1 ]
Rosen, Mark [2 ]
Madabhushi, Anant [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, 599 Taylor Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2008年 / 6915卷
关键词
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS); prostate cancer; automated detection; computer aided diagnosis; combination schemes; multimodal integration;
D O I
10.1117/12.771022
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Recently, in vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) have emerged as promising new modalities to aid in prostate cancer (CaP) detection. MRI provides anatomic and structural information of the prostate while MRS provides functional data pertaining to biochemical concentrations of metabolites such as creatine, choline and citrate. We have previously presented a hierarchical clustering scheme for CaP detection on in vivo prostate MRS and have recently developed a computer-aided method for CaP detection on in vivo prostate MRI. In this paper we present a novel scheme to develop a meta-classifier to detect CaP in vivo via quantitative integration of multimodal prostate MRS and MRI by use of non-linear dimensionality reduction (NLDR) methods including spectral clustering and locally linear embedding (LLE). Quantitative integration of multimodal image data (MRI and PET) involves the concatenation of image intensities following image registration. However multimodal data integration is non-trivial when the individual modalities include spectral and image intensity data. We propose a data combination solution wherein we project the feature spaces (image intensities and spectral data) associated with each of the modalities into a lower dimensional embedding space via NLDR. NLDR methods preserve the relationships between the objects in the original high dimensional space when projecting them into the reduced low dimensional space. Since the original spectral and image intensity data are divorced from their original physical meaning in the reduced dimensional space, data at the same spatial location can be integrated by concatenating the respective embedding vectors. Unsupervised consensus clustering is then used to partition objects into different classes in the combined MRS and MRI embedding space. Quantitative results of our multimodal computer-aided diagnosis scheme on 16 sets of patient data obtained from the ACRIN trial, for which corresponding histological ground truth for spatial extent of CaP is known, show a marginally higher sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value compared to corresponding CAD results with the individual modalities.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 T: Failure of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Provide Added Value
    Platzek, Ivan
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    Toma, Marieta
    Brauer, Thomas
    Meissner, Christoph
    Dietel, Katrin
    Wirth, Manfred
    Laniado, Michael
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2015, 39 (05) : 674 - 680
  • [42] Use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in localized prostate cancer
    O'Connor, Luke
    Wang, Alex
    Walker, Stephanie M.
    Yerram, Nitin
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Turkbey, Baris
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2020, 17 (05) : 435 - 442
  • [43] Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging approach to molecular imaging of prostate cancer
    Kurhanewicz, J
    Swanson, MG
    Nelson, SJ
    Vigneron, DB
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 16 (04) : 451 - 463
  • [44] Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis
    Engelbrecht, MR
    Jager, GJ
    Laheij, RJ
    Verbeek, ALM
    van Lier, HJ
    Barentsz, JO
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (09) : 2294 - 2302
  • [45] Prostate magnetic resonance imaging technique
    Thais C. Mussi
    Ronaldo H. Baroni
    Ronald J. Zagoria
    Antonio C. Westphalen
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 2109 - 2119
  • [46] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate
    Oliveira Neto, Jaime Araujo
    Parente, Daniella Braz
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 21 (02) : 409 - +
  • [47] Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging of Prostate
    Yuan, Qing
    Recchimuzzi, Debora Z.
    Costa, Daniel N.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 32 (01) : 171 - 179
  • [48] Prostate Segmentation on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Ren, Chengjuan
    Ren, Huipeng
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 145944 - 145953
  • [49] Advances in Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Walker, Stephanie M.
    Fernandez, Martina
    Turkbey, Baris
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 28 (03) : 407 - +
  • [50] Three-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a complementary tool to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the identification of aggressive prostate cancer at 3.0T
    Deal, Michael
    Bardet, Florian
    Walker, Paul-Michael
    de la Vega, Mathilde Funes
    Cochet, Alexandre
    Cormier, Luc
    Bentellis, Imad
    Loffroy, Romaric
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2021, 11 (08) : 3749 - 3766