A meta-classifier for detecting prostate cancer by quantitative integration of in vivo magnetic resonance Spectroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging

被引:0
|
作者
Viswanath, Satish [1 ]
Tiwari, Pallavi [1 ]
Rosen, Mark [2 ]
Madabhushi, Anant [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, 599 Taylor Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2008年 / 6915卷
关键词
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS); prostate cancer; automated detection; computer aided diagnosis; combination schemes; multimodal integration;
D O I
10.1117/12.771022
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Recently, in vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) have emerged as promising new modalities to aid in prostate cancer (CaP) detection. MRI provides anatomic and structural information of the prostate while MRS provides functional data pertaining to biochemical concentrations of metabolites such as creatine, choline and citrate. We have previously presented a hierarchical clustering scheme for CaP detection on in vivo prostate MRS and have recently developed a computer-aided method for CaP detection on in vivo prostate MRI. In this paper we present a novel scheme to develop a meta-classifier to detect CaP in vivo via quantitative integration of multimodal prostate MRS and MRI by use of non-linear dimensionality reduction (NLDR) methods including spectral clustering and locally linear embedding (LLE). Quantitative integration of multimodal image data (MRI and PET) involves the concatenation of image intensities following image registration. However multimodal data integration is non-trivial when the individual modalities include spectral and image intensity data. We propose a data combination solution wherein we project the feature spaces (image intensities and spectral data) associated with each of the modalities into a lower dimensional embedding space via NLDR. NLDR methods preserve the relationships between the objects in the original high dimensional space when projecting them into the reduced low dimensional space. Since the original spectral and image intensity data are divorced from their original physical meaning in the reduced dimensional space, data at the same spatial location can be integrated by concatenating the respective embedding vectors. Unsupervised consensus clustering is then used to partition objects into different classes in the combined MRS and MRI embedding space. Quantitative results of our multimodal computer-aided diagnosis scheme on 16 sets of patient data obtained from the ACRIN trial, for which corresponding histological ground truth for spatial extent of CaP is known, show a marginally higher sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value compared to corresponding CAD results with the individual modalities.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION
    Garcia-Cruz, Eduardo
    Ramon-Barcelo, Catalina
    Carrion-Puig, Ramon
    Alcaraz, Antonio
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2019, 72 (04): : 374 - 380
  • [32] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF PROSTATE-CANCER
    PARIVAR, F
    WALUCH, V
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1992, 23 (04) : 335 - 343
  • [33] Value of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis
    Friedrich Aigner
    Leo Pallwein
    Alexandre Pelzer
    Georg Schaefer
    Georg Bartsch
    Dieter zur Nedden
    Ferdinand Frauscher
    World Journal of Urology, 2007, 25 : 351 - 359
  • [34] Is magnetic resonance imaging necessary in the staging of prostate cancer?
    Tüzel, E
    Sevinç, M
    Obuz, F
    Sade, M
    Kirkali, Z
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1998, 61 (04) : 227 - 231
  • [35] Registration of histopathology to magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer
    Sandgren, Kristina
    Nilsson, Erik
    Lindberg, Angsana Keeratijarut
    Strandberg, Sara
    Blomqvist, Lennart
    Bergh, Anders
    Friedrich, Bengt
    Axelsson, Jan
    Ogren, Margareta
    Ogren, Mattias
    Widmark, Anders
    Karlsson, Camilla Thellenberg
    Soderkvist, Karin
    Riklund, Katrine
    Jonsson, Joakim
    Nyholm, Tufve
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 18 : 19 - 25
  • [36] Patient selection for magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer
    Engelbrecht, MR
    Jager, GJ
    Severens, JL
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (03) : 300 - 307
  • [37] Prostate cancer risk stratification with magnetic resonance imaging
    Felker, Ely R.
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Nassiri, Nima
    Marks, Leonard S.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (07) : 311 - 319
  • [38] Current Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer
    Mehralivand S.
    Sidana A.
    Maruf M.
    Choyke P.L.
    Pinto P.A.
    Turkbey B.
    Current Radiology Reports, 5 (11)
  • [39] THE USE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN ALCOHOL RESEARCH
    Nagel, Bonnie J.
    Kroenke, Christopher D.
    ALCOHOL RESEARCH & HEALTH, 2008, 31 (03) : 243 - 246
  • [40] Value of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis
    Aigner, Friedrich
    Pallwein, Leo
    Pelzer, Alexandre
    Schaefer, Georg
    Bartsch, Georg
    zur Nedden, Dieter
    Frauscher, Ferdinand
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 25 (04) : 351 - 359