A meta-classifier for detecting prostate cancer by quantitative integration of in vivo magnetic resonance Spectroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging

被引:0
|
作者
Viswanath, Satish [1 ]
Tiwari, Pallavi [1 ]
Rosen, Mark [2 ]
Madabhushi, Anant [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, 599 Taylor Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2008年 / 6915卷
关键词
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS); prostate cancer; automated detection; computer aided diagnosis; combination schemes; multimodal integration;
D O I
10.1117/12.771022
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Recently, in vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) have emerged as promising new modalities to aid in prostate cancer (CaP) detection. MRI provides anatomic and structural information of the prostate while MRS provides functional data pertaining to biochemical concentrations of metabolites such as creatine, choline and citrate. We have previously presented a hierarchical clustering scheme for CaP detection on in vivo prostate MRS and have recently developed a computer-aided method for CaP detection on in vivo prostate MRI. In this paper we present a novel scheme to develop a meta-classifier to detect CaP in vivo via quantitative integration of multimodal prostate MRS and MRI by use of non-linear dimensionality reduction (NLDR) methods including spectral clustering and locally linear embedding (LLE). Quantitative integration of multimodal image data (MRI and PET) involves the concatenation of image intensities following image registration. However multimodal data integration is non-trivial when the individual modalities include spectral and image intensity data. We propose a data combination solution wherein we project the feature spaces (image intensities and spectral data) associated with each of the modalities into a lower dimensional embedding space via NLDR. NLDR methods preserve the relationships between the objects in the original high dimensional space when projecting them into the reduced low dimensional space. Since the original spectral and image intensity data are divorced from their original physical meaning in the reduced dimensional space, data at the same spatial location can be integrated by concatenating the respective embedding vectors. Unsupervised consensus clustering is then used to partition objects into different classes in the combined MRS and MRI embedding space. Quantitative results of our multimodal computer-aided diagnosis scheme on 16 sets of patient data obtained from the ACRIN trial, for which corresponding histological ground truth for spatial extent of CaP is known, show a marginally higher sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value compared to corresponding CAD results with the individual modalities.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer radiotherapy
    Dinh, Cuong V.
    Steenbergen, Peter
    Ghobadi, Ghazaleh
    Heijmink, Stijn W. T. J. P.
    Pos, Floris J.
    Haustermans, Karin
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 32 (03): : 446 - 451
  • [22] Prostate cancer: opportunities for magnetic resonance imaging
    Alyaev, Yu. G.
    Ternovoy, S. K.
    Bezrukov, E. A.
    Morozov, S. P.
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2008, 5 (01) : 11 - 17
  • [23] Repeatability of Quantitative Imaging Features in Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Lu, Hong
    Parra, Nestor A.
    Qi, Jin
    Gage, Kenneth
    Li, Qian
    Fan, Shuxuan
    Feuerlein, Sebastian
    Pow-Sang, Julio
    Gillies, Robert
    Choi, Jung W.
    Balagurunathan, Yoganand
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [24] Prostate cancer - the role of magnetic resonance imaging
    Mocikova, Ingrid
    Babela, Jozef
    Balaz, Vladimir
    BIOMEDICAL PAPERS-OLOMOUC, 2012, 156 (02): : 103 - 107
  • [25] Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer
    Swanson, MG
    Vigneron, DB
    Tran, TKC
    Kurhanewicz, J
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2001, 19 (05) : 510 - 523
  • [26] Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of human body fluids and in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Potential role in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer
    Gholizadeh, Neda
    Pundavela, Jay
    Nagarajan, Rajakumar
    Dona, Anthony
    Quadrelli, Scott
    Biswas, Tapan
    Greer, Peter B.
    Ramadan, Saadallah
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (04) : 150 - 173
  • [27] Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer
    Seitz, Michael
    Shukla-Dave, Amita
    Bjartell, Anders
    Touijer, Karim
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    Bastian, Patrick J.
    Stief, Christian
    Hricak, Hedvig
    Graser, Anno
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (04) : 801 - 814
  • [28] A Supervised Learning Tool for Prostate Cancer Foci Detection and Aggressiveness Identification using Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging
    Kirlik, Gokhan
    Gullapalli, Rao
    D'Souza, Warren
    Iqbal, Gazi Md Daud
    Naslund, Michael
    Wong, Jade
    Papadimitrou, John
    Roys, Steve
    Mistry, Nilesh
    Zhang, Hao
    CANCER INFORMATICS, 2018, 17
  • [29] Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer
    Turkbey, Baris
    Brown, Anna M.
    Sankineni, Sandeep
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2016, 66 (04) : 326 - 336
  • [30] Use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in diagnosing prostate cancer
    Comet-Bathe, Josep
    Arzoz Fabregas, Montserrat
    Maroto Genover, Albert
    Lopez Bonet, Eugeni
    Osono Fernandez, Margarita
    Vilanova Busquets, Joan Caries
    Barcelo Obregen, Joaquim
    Barcelo Vidal, Cartes
    SALUD I CIENCIA, 2010, 17 (07): : 661 - 666