Risk factors of circumferential resection margin involvement in the patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer

被引:19
|
作者
Oh, Sung Jin [1 ]
Shin, Jin Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Inje Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Haeundae Paik Hosp, Pusan 612862, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY | 2012年 / 82卷 / 03期
关键词
Circumferential resection margin; Rectal neoplasms; Risk factors; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; TUMOR; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ADENOCARCINOMA; MULTICENTER; TRIAL;
D O I
10.4174/jkss.2012.82.3.165
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Currently, circumferential resection margins (CRM) are used as a clinical endpoint in studies on the prognosis of rectal cancer. Although the concept of a circumferential resection margin in extraperitoneal rectal cancer differs from that in intraperitoneal rectal cancer due to differences in anatomical and biologic behaviors, previous reports have provided information on CRM involvement in all types of rectal cancer including intraperitoneal lesions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze risk factors of CRM involvement in extraperitoneal rectal cancer. Methods: From January 2005 to December 2008, 306 patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer were enrolled in a prospectively collected database. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of CRM involvement. Results: The overall rate of CRM involvement was found to be 16.0%. Multivariate analysis showed that male sex, larger tumor size (>= 4 cm), stage higher than T3, nodal metastasis, tumor perforation and non-sphincter preserving proctectomy (NSPP) were risk factors for CRM involvement. Conclusion: Male sex, larger tumor size (>= 4 cm), advanced T stage, nodal metastasis, tumor perforation, and NSPP are significant risk factors of CRM involvement in extraperitoneal rectal cancer. Given that postoperative chemoradiotherapy is recommended for patients with a positive CRM, further oncologic studies are warranted to ascertain which patients with these risk factors would require adjuvant therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 171
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Differences in Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement After Abdominoperineal Excision and Low Anterior Resection No Longer Significant
    van Leersum, Nicoline
    Martijnse, Ingrid
    den Dulk, Marcel
    Kolfschoten, Nikki
    Le Cessie, Saskia
    van de Velde, Cornelius
    Tollenaar, Rob
    Wouters, Michel
    Rutten, Harm J.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 259 (06) : 1150 - 1155
  • [32] Hospital and surgeon variation in positive circumferential resection margin among rectal cancer patients
    Justiniano, Carla E.
    Aquina, Christopher T.
    Fleming, Fergal J.
    Xu, Zhaomin
    Boscoe, Francis P.
    Schymura, Maria J.
    Temple, Larissa K.
    Becerra, Adan Z.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 218 (05) : 881 - 886
  • [33] Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population-based retrospective study
    Liu, Qi
    Luo, Dakui
    Cai, Sanjun
    Li, Qingguo
    Li, Xinxiang
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (08): : 3673 - 3681
  • [34] Investigation of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer surgery
    Dardanov, D.
    Betova, T.
    Deliyski, T.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2007, 12 (03): : 369 - 376
  • [35] Rectal Cancers With Microscopic Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement (R1 Resections): Survivals, Patterns of Recurrence, and Prognostic Factors
    Gravante, Gianpiero
    Hemingway, David
    Stephenson, James Andrew
    Sharpe, David
    Osman, Ahmed
    Haines, Melissa
    Pirjamali, Vafa
    Sorge, Roberto
    Yeung, Justin Ming
    Norwood, Michael
    Miller, Andrew
    Boyle, Kirsten
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 114 (05) : 642 - 648
  • [36] Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement in patients receiving potentially curative treatment for oesophageal cancer
    Quinn, Lauren M.
    Hollis, Alexander C.
    Hodson, James
    Elshafie, Mona A.
    Hallissey, Mike T.
    Whiting, John L.
    Griffiths, Ewen A.
    EJSO, 2018, 44 (08): : 1268 - 1277
  • [37] Circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity after MRI assessment and adjuvant treatment in 189 patients undergoing rectal cancer resection
    Simpson, G. S.
    Eardley, N.
    McNicol, F.
    Healey, P.
    Hughes, M.
    Rooney, P. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 29 (05) : 585 - 590
  • [38] Development of a Predictive Nomogram for Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Shroder, Megan
    Ford, Molly M.
    Ye, Fei
    Zhiguo, Zhao
    Khan, Aimal
    Mcchesney, Shannon
    Hopkins, Benjamin
    Hawkins, Alexander T.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 296 : 532 - 540
  • [39] Benchmarking circumferential resection margin (R1) resection rate for rectal cancer in the neoadjuvant era
    Chambers, W.
    Collins, G.
    Warren, B.
    Cunningham, C.
    Mortensen, N.
    Lindsey, I.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (09) : 909 - 913
  • [40] The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer
    Patel, A.
    Green, N.
    Sarmah, P.
    Langman, G.
    Chandrakumaran, K.
    Youssef, H.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 23 (02) : 151 - 159