Recent advances on anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater

被引:44
作者
Lourinho, G. [1 ]
Rodrigues, L. F. T. G. [1 ]
Brito, P. S. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] VALORIZA Res Ctr Endogenous Resource Valorizat, Campus Politecn 10, P-7300555 Portalegre, Portugal
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Swine wastewater; Microbiology; Inhibition; Biogas; Digestate; CONTINUOUS DRY FERMENTATION; PIG MANURE TREATMENT; CO-DIGESTION; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; METHANE PRODUCTION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; CHLORELLA-VULGARIS;
D O I
10.1007/s13762-020-02793-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion is a valuable technology for the elimination of biodegradable pollutants and stabilization of agro-industrial wastes. This review focuses on the AD of wastewaters derived from swine production within the scope of wastewater treatment and bioenergy production. Fundamental principles of AD as a biochemical and microbiological process are described. The effect of essential parameters is also examined in the context of swine wastewater, especially the relation between chemical and operational factors, process stability and performance. The review continues with a discussion of current trends and future achievements in AD research of swine wastes, namely co-digestion with carbon-rich substrates, integration with pretreatment methods, process enhancement via the use of additives, and digestate management. Finally, a brief outlook on the economy of biogas utilization is provided to better understanding the future of AD as biotechnology for on-farm treatment of swine wastewater.
引用
收藏
页码:4917 / 4938
页数:22
相关论文
共 135 条
  • [1] Nutrition, key factor to reduce environmental load from pig production
    Aarnink, A. J. A.
    Verstegen, M. W. A.
    [J]. LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2007, 109 (1-3) : 194 - 203
  • [2] A metaproteomic approach gives functional insights into anaerobic digestion
    Abram, F.
    Enright, A. -M.
    O'Reilly, J.
    Botting, C. H.
    Collins, G.
    O'Flaherty, V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 110 (06) : 1550 - 1560
  • [3] Anaerobic digestion from the viewpoint of microbiological, chemical, and operational aspects - a review
    Amani, T.
    Nosrati, M.
    Sreekrishnan, T. R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS, 2010, 18 : 255 - 278
  • [4] Contribution to Circular Economy options of mixed agricultural wastes management: Coupling anaerobic digestion with gasification for enhanced energy and material recovery
    Antoniou, N.
    Monlau, F.
    Sambusiti, C.
    Ficara, E.
    Barakat, A.
    Zabaniotou, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 209 : 505 - 514
  • [5] Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge
    Appels, Lise
    Baeyens, Jan
    Degreve, Jan
    Dewil, Raf
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2008, 34 (06) : 755 - 781
  • [6] Effectiveness of interventions to prevent motorcycle injuries: systematic review of the literature
    Araujo, Miguel
    Illanes, Eduardo
    Chapman, Evelina
    Rodrigues, Eugenia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INJURY CONTROL AND SAFETY PROMOTION, 2017, 24 (03) : 406 - 422
  • [7] Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste
    Ariunbaatar, Javkhlan
    Panico, Antonio
    Esposito, Giovanni
    Pirozzi, Francesco
    Lens, Piet N. L.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 123 : 143 - 156
  • [8] Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and algae: Impact of intracellular algal products recovery on co-digestion performance
    Astals, S.
    Musenze, R. S.
    Bai, X.
    Tannock, S.
    Tait, S.
    Pratt, S.
    Jensen, P. D.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 181 : 97 - 104
  • [9] Co-combustion performance and kinetic study of solid digestate with gasification biochar
    Barbanera, M.
    Cotana, F.
    Di Matteo, U.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 121 : 597 - 605
  • [10] Environmental assessment of pig slurry management after local characterization and normalization
    Bayo, J.
    Gomez-Lopez, M. D.
    Faz, A.
    Caballero, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 32 : 227 - 235