Aerosol tracking using lidar-based atmospheric profiling and Bayesian estimation

被引:8
|
作者
Elbakary, Mohamed I. [1 ]
Abdelghaffar, Hossam M. [2 ,4 ]
Afrifa, Kwasi [1 ]
Rakha, Hesham A. [2 ]
Cetin, Mecit [3 ]
Iftekharuddin, Khan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Old Dominion Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, 231 Kaufman Hall, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Ctr Sustainable Mobil, Transportat Inst, Blacksburg, VA 24060 USA
[3] Old Dominion Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
[4] Mansoura Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Comp Engn & Syst, Mansoura, Egypt
来源
关键词
Air pollution; Lidar; Laser-based systems; Soot pollution; INVERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106248
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Soot aerosol in atmosphere is one of deadliest forms of air pollution and is a major cause for health problems according to EPA. Compact light detection and ranging (lidar) systems can be used to obtain aerosol profile measurements by identifying aerosol scattering ratios as function of altitude. Aerosol ratio parameters are known to vary with aerosol type, size, and shape. This work employs a ground-based lidar system to detect the source of soot emissions in atmosphere in a wide area around the campus of Old Dominion University (ODU), Norfolk, VA. Different aerosol scattering ratio parameters including lidar and color ratios are obtained from collected lidar data around the campus and these ratios are analyzed for detection and quantification of soot aerosol. A Bayesian estimation algorithm was chosen, after extensive study, to determine the source of the soot in the measurements by tracking the pollution concentration. Results of the analysis using lidar data show that the source of soot pollution is a nearby major Hampton Blvd. Hampton Blvd. is a major arterial with traffic signals through the ODU campus where diesel trucks frequently travel to serve Port of Virginia, which ranks as the third largest container port on the East Coast.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing the accuracy of regional LiDAR-based biomass estimation using a simulation approach
    Ene, Liviu Theodor
    Naesset, Erik
    Gobakken, Terje
    Gregoire, Timothy G.
    Stahl, Goran
    Nelson, Ross
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 123 : 579 - 592
  • [22] Lidar-Based Height Correction for the Assimilation of Atmospheric Motion Vectors
    Folger, Kathrin
    Weissmann, Martin
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2016, 55 (10) : 2211 - 2227
  • [23] On the Calibration of Uncertainty Estimation in LiDAR-based Semantic Segmentation
    Dreissig, Mariella
    Piewak, Florian
    Boedecker, Joschka
    2023 IEEE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, ITSC, 2023, : 4798 - 4805
  • [24] Lidar-based gas analyzer for remote sensing of atmospheric methane
    Meshcherinov, Viacheslav
    Kazakov, Viktor
    Spiridonov, Maxim
    Suvorov, Gennady
    Rodin, Alexander
    SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, 2025, 424
  • [25] BEV Object Tracking for LIDAR-based Ground Truth Generation
    Montero, David
    Aranjuelo, Nerea
    Senderos, Orti
    Nieto, Marcos
    2019 27TH EUROPEAN SIGNAL PROCESSING CONFERENCE (EUSIPCO), 2019,
  • [26] Measurements of atmospheric parameters using aerosol lidar
    Grigorov, I.
    Kolarov, G.
    JOURNAL OF OPTOELECTRONICS AND ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2007, 9 (11): : 3549 - 3552
  • [27] Ultraviolet lidar for profiling of the urban atmospheric aerosol in spatial and temporal at Xi'an
    Liu, Jun
    Hua, Deng-Xin
    Li, Yan
    Guangzi Xuebao/Acta Photonica Sinica, 2007, 36 (08): : 1534 - 1537
  • [28] Lidar-based studies of aerosol optical properties over coastal areas
    Zielinski, Tymon
    Pflug, Bringfried
    SENSORS, 2007, 7 (12) : 3347 - 3365
  • [29] Atmospheric profiling using lidar from ship-based platforms
    Brewer, WA
    Intrieri, JM
    Hardesty, RM
    Senff, CJ
    SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TROPOSPHERIC PROFILING: NEEDS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2003, : 407 - 409
  • [30] Assessment of LiDAR-Based Atmospheric Observations Using YOLOv9 for Sky Image Recognition
    Xu, Long
    Lin, Xin
    Liu, Linmei
    Wang, Jiqin
    Lin, Xingkui
    Bai, Chunhai
    Lin, Zhaoxiang
    Wang, Wei
    Yang, Yong
    Cheng, Xuewu
    Li, Faquan
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2025, 25 (01) : 1825 - 1838