Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study

被引:207
作者
Marra, Rose M. [1 ]
Rodgers, Kelly A. [2 ]
Shen, Demei [1 ]
Bogue, Barbara [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] CUNY, Dept Social Sci, New York, NY 10007 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
academic factors; diversity; retention; SELF-EFFICACY; WOMEN; STUDENTS; PERSISTENCE; SCIENCE; GENDER; ENVIRONMENT; MATHEMATICS; CLASSROOM; FACULTY;
D O I
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND As estimates continue to indicate a growing demand for engineering professionals, retention in engineering remains an issue. Thus, the engineering education community remains concerned about students who leave engineering and must work to identify the factors that influence those students' decisions. PURPOSE (HYPOTHESIS) Our purpose was to identify a set of factors describing the experiences of students' in a college of engineering that are strong influences on decisions to leave and study how those factors are related to both predictor variables (e.g., high school preparation) and future behaviors (e.g., new major chosen). DESIGN/METHOD We solicited survey data from students who had recently transferred out of a large engineering college. We conducted exploratory factor analysis to determine the main factors for leaving engineering and then used these factors to answer the research questions. RESULTS Results indicate that both academic (e.g., curriculum difficulty and poor teaching and advising) and a non-academic factor (lack of belonging in engineering) contribute to students' decisions to leave engineering. We did find differences for some factors between majority and non-majority students; however, there were no gender differences. CONCLUSIONS Both academic and non-academic factors contribute to students' decisions to leave engineering; however, our sample indicated the non-academic factors may be a stronger influence. Implications for educators focus on addressing both academic and the belonging factor and include examining pedagogical activities that may be less welcoming to a wide variety of student groups, providing opportunities for meaningful faculty interaction and other activities designed to support students pursuing engineering degrees.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 27
页数:22
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] *AAUW, 2008, GIRLS AR FACTS GEND
  • [2] Adelman C., 1998, Women and men of the engineering path: A model for the analysis of undergraduate careers
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2004, WOM MIN PERS DIS SCI
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, Science and Engineering Indicators 2006
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1997, TALKING LEAVING
  • [6] Factors influencing university drop out rates
    Araque, Francisco
    Roldan, Concepcion
    Salguero, Alberto
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2009, 53 (03) : 563 - 574
  • [7] Astin A., 1992, FINAL REPORT UNDERGR
  • [8] SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) : 191 - 215
  • [9] Understanding our students: A longitudinal-study of success and failure in engineering with implications for increased retention
    Bernold, Leonhard E.
    Spurlin, Joni E.
    Anson, Chris M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 96 (03) : 263 - 274
  • [10] Besterfield-Sacre M., 1997, JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION-WASHINGTON-, V86, P139, DOI [10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00277.x, DOI 10.1002/J.2168-9830.1997.TB00277.X, 10.1002/j.21689830.1997.tb00277.x]