Fuzzy decision support system for spread mooring system selection

被引:15
|
作者
Mentes, Ayhan [1 ]
Helvacioglu, Ismail Hakki [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Naval Architecture & Ocean Engn, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Spread mooring system; Decision making; Fuzzy set theory; Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making; AHP; TOPSIS; TOPSIS METHOD; OPTIMIZATION; METHODOLOGY; EXTENSION; IDEAL; RISK; SETS; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.016
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Spread mooring systems are associated with high level uncertainties and risks during tanker loading/unloading operations. In addition, the design of such complex systems consists of many subjective and imprecise parameters. Therefore, in the present study, a fuzzy based decision support methodology is designed to overcome aforementioned characteristics. The fuzzy methodology incorporates qualitative and partially known information into the decision support model and provides a robust mathematical framework for modeling of the spread mooring systems. Proposed model is based on the analytic hierarchy method (AHP) and the technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) methods in a fuzzy environment where the vagueness and subjectivity are handled with linguistic and fuzzy values. The fuzzy AHP method is used to analyze the structure of the mooring system selection problem and determine the weights of the attributes while fuzzy TOPSIS method is employed for ranking the spread mooring systems. The case study demonstrates the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed methodology. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3283 / 3297
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decision support system for the selection of advanced manufacturing technologies
    Al-Ahmari, Abdulrahman M.
    Ateekh-Ur-Rehman
    Ali, Shawkat
    Journal of Engineering Research, 2016, 4 (04): : 130 - 150
  • [32] The K-T Conditions for Portfolio Selection Problem in Fuzzy Decision System
    Liu, Ying
    Hao, Fang-Fang
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 860 - 865
  • [33] Fuzzy Rule-Based Decision Support System for Technology Start-Up Selection Problem
    Arsenyan, Jbid
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP (ECIE 2017), 2017, : 40 - 49
  • [34] Supplier selection model for commodities procurement. Optimised assessment using a fuzzy decision support system
    Garcia, Nazario
    Puente, Javier
    Fernandez, Isabel
    Priore, Paolo
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2013, 13 (04) : 1939 - 1951
  • [35] A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM USING FUZZY ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (FAHP) AND TOPSIS APPROACHES FOR SELECTION OF THE OPTIMUM UNDERGROUND MINING METHOD
    Mikaeil, Reza
    Naghadehi, Masoud Zare
    Ataei, Mohammad
    Khalokakaie, Reza
    ARCHIVES OF MINING SCIENCES, 2009, 54 (02) : 349 - 368
  • [36] Decision Support System Based on Spherical 2-tuple Linguistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and their Application in Green Supplier Selection
    Qiyas, Muhammad
    Abdullah, Saleem
    PUNJAB UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, 2022, 54 (06): : 411 - 428
  • [37] Decision Support System for High Achieving Students Selection Using AHP and TOPSIS
    Bagi, Yufika Sari
    Suyono
    Tomatala, Michel Farrel
    PROCEEDINGS OF ICORIS 2020: 2020 THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBERNETICS AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEM (ICORIS), 2020, : 250 - 254
  • [38] A framework to support decision making in the selection of sustainable drainage system design alternatives
    Wang, Mingming
    Sweetapple, Chris
    Fu, Guangtao
    Farmani, Raziyeh
    Butler, David
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 201 : 145 - 152
  • [39] An application of fuzzy fault tree analysis for spread mooring systems
    Mentes, Ayhan
    Helvacioglu, Ismail H.
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2011, 38 (2-3) : 285 - 294
  • [40] A FUZZY MULTI-OBJECTIVE BILEVEL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM
    Gao, Ya
    Zhang, Guangquan
    Lu, Jie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2009, 8 (01) : 93 - 108