Introduction of appendiceal CT - Impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates

被引:200
作者
Rao, PM [1 ]
Rhea, JT
Rattner, DW
Venus, LG
Novelline, RA
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000658-199903000-00007
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To evaluate the impact of appendiceal computed tomography (CT) availability on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Summary Background Data Appendiceal CT is 98% accurate. However, its impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates has not been reported. Methods The authors reviewed the medical records of 493 consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy between 1992 and 1995, 209 consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy in 1997 (59% of whom had appendiceal CT), and 206 patients who underwent appendiceal CT in 1997 without subsequent appendectomy. Results Before appendiceal CT, 98/493 patients (20%) taken to surgery had a normal appendix. After CT availability, 15/209 patients (7%) taken to surgery had a normal appendix; 7 patients did not have CT, 5 patients had surgery despite a negative CT, and 3 patients had a false-positive CT. Negative appendectomy rates were lowered overall (20% to 7%), in men (11% to 5%), in women (35% to 11%), in boys (10% to 5%), and in girls (18% to 12%), Appendiceal perforation rates dropped from 22% to 14% after CT availability. CT excluded appendicitis in 206 patients in 1997 who avoided appendectomy and identified alternative diagnoses in 105 of these patients (51%). Conclusion The availability of appendiceal CT coincided with a drop in the negative appendectomy rate from 20% to 7% in all patients, and to only 3% in patients with a positive CT. Perforation rates decreased from 22% to 14%, Appendiceal CT can be advocated in nearly ail female and many male patients.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 349
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] ACUTE APPENDICITIS - CT AND US CORRELATION IN 100 PATIENTS
    BALTHAZAR, EJ
    BIRNBAUM, BA
    YEE, J
    MEGIBOW, AJ
    ROSHKOW, J
    GRAY, C
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [2] APPENDICITIS - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION WITH HIGH-RESOLUTION CT
    BALTHAZAR, EJ
    MEGIBOW, AJ
    SIEGEL, SE
    BIRNBAUM, BA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 180 (01) : 21 - 24
  • [3] CALDER JDF, 1995, BRIT J HOSP MED, V54, P129
  • [4] COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE ABDOMINAL PAIN
    DEDOMBAL, FT
    MCCANN, AP
    LEAPER, DJ
    STANILAND, JR
    HORROCKS, JC
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1972, 2 (5804): : 9 - +
  • [5] Deutsch A A, 1983, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V28, P35
  • [6] FORD RD, 1994, AM SURGEON, V60, P895
  • [7] Acute appendicitis: MR imaging and sonographic correlation
    Incesu, L
    Coskun, A
    Selcuk, MB
    Akan, H
    Sozubir, S
    Bernay, F
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (03) : 669 - 674
  • [8] ACUTE APPENDICITIS - PROSPECTIVE TRIAL CONCERNING DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY AND COMPLICATIONS
    JESS, P
    BJERREGAARD, B
    BRYNITZ, S
    HOLSTCHRISTENSEN, J
    KALAJA, E
    LUNDKRISTENSEN, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 141 (02) : 232 - 234
  • [9] Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis
    Lane, MJ
    Katz, DS
    Ross, BA
    ClauticeEngle, TL
    Mindelzun, RE
    Jeffrey, RB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (02) : 405 - 409
  • [10] LEWIS FR, 1975, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V110, P677