Comparison of Two Cooling and Dehumidifying Methods for a Semi-Closed Organic Tomato Greenhouse

被引:3
|
作者
Vallieres, M. [1 ]
de Halleux, D. [1 ]
Dorais, M. [2 ]
Bouzid, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[3] Jardins Nat, New Richmond, PQ G0C 2B0, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENVIRONMENT CONTROL, ENERGY-SAVING AND CROP PRODUCTION IN GREENHOUSE AND PLANT FACTORY - GREENSYS 2013 | 2014年 / 1037卷
关键词
carbon dioxide (CO2); geothermal energy; water curtain; fan coil; temperature; humidity; northern greenhouse;
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1037.78
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Two non-traditional methods of cooling and dehumidifying (C/D) were compared in a semi-closed greenhouse using cold water withdrawals from a saturated water table in order to 1) maintain the greenhouse semi-closed under high solar radiation, 2) evaluate the impact of both systems on temperature on relative air humidity (RH) and on vapor pressure deficit (VPD), 3) increase carbon dioxide levels (CO2) by limiting air external exchanges, and 4) reduce the CO2 consumption. The first studied method was a cold water fan coil system where greenhouse air was cooled through a coil on which the water vapour was condensed. The second method was a cold water curtain installed above the canopy, forcing warm humid air to condense on its surface, thus generating a free convection air movement within the greenhouse. These two heat exchanger methods were compared with the traditional natural ventilation C/D technique. The cooling capacities of both systems varied between 125 and 600 W m(-2). Under sunny summer days, higher than 838 W m(-2) for each system, the water curtain, the fan coil system and the traditional method were able to maintain set 24 h temperature (21.2, 21.2 and 21.9 degrees C), and RH (82.0, 82.4, and 77.5%) corresponding to acceptable VPD levels (0.5, 0.5 and 0.6) in the greenhouse. By maintaining closed-roofs, the water curtain and the fan coil technology maintained higher maximum levels of CO2 (1,046 and 992 mu mol mol(-1)) in the greenhouses compared to the traditional method (550 mu mol mol(-1)). During sunny days, the water curtain and the fan coil demonstrated higher maximum daily temperatures (26.6 and 29.6 degrees C), while cooler minimum temperatures during the night (18.1 and 15.8 degrees C) were observed resulting in a similar 24 h mean temperature. Compared to the water curtain, the fan coil system had the advantage of requiring low maintenance with a reduced fungal disease risk. When comparing the CO2 injection strategies, it was observed that the greenhouse using the fan coil technology injected up to 20% less than the traditional method.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 616
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Extension and evaluation of a model for automatic drainage solution management in tomato crops grown in semi-closed hydroponic systems
    Katsoulas, Nikolaos
    Savvas, Dimitrios
    Kitta, Evangelini
    Bartzanas, Thomas
    Kittas, Constantinos
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2015, 113 : 61 - 71
  • [42] Time to a 90% Change in Gas Concentration: A Comparison of Three Semi-Closed Anesthesia Breathing Systems
    Dosch, Michael P.
    Loeb, Robert G.
    Brainerd, Tiffany L.
    Stallwood, John F.
    Lechner, Steven
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 108 (04): : 1193 - 1197
  • [43] Spatiotemporal Distributions of Energy and Water Consumption in Open, Semi-Closed and Closed Loop Heat Pump Greenhouse Systems, and Associated Management Strategies in Canada
    Yildiz, I.
    Yue, J.
    Lowrey, J.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENVIRONMENT CONTROL, ENERGY-SAVING AND CROP PRODUCTION IN GREENHOUSE AND PLANT FACTORY - GREENSYS 2013, 2014, 1037 : 119 - 128
  • [44] Comparison of photosynthetic efficiency and growth characteristics of paprika in semi-closed vs. conventional greenhouses
    Kim, Eun ji
    Lee, Beom Seon
    Jeon, Yong Hwan
    Ju, Se Hun
    Go, Yoon
    Park, Jin Sub
    Lee, Joonwoo
    Yang, Huijun
    Na, Haeyoung
    HORTICULTURE ENVIRONMENT AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 64 (06) : 977 - 985
  • [45] Comparison of photosynthetic efficiency and growth characteristics of paprika in semi-closed vs. conventional greenhouses
    Eun ji Kim
    Beom Seon Lee
    Yong Hwan Jeon
    Se Hun Ju
    Yoon Go
    Jin Sub Park
    Joonwoo Lee
    Huijun Yang
    Haeyoung Na
    Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 2023, 64 : 977 - 985
  • [46] Intelligent control and energy optimization in controlled environment agriculture via nonlinear model predictive control of semi-closed greenhouse
    Chen, Wei-Han
    Mattson, Neil S.
    You, Fengqi
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 320
  • [47] Experimental observation of flow instability in a semi-closed two-phase natural circulation loop
    Kim, JM
    Lee, SY
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2000, 196 (03) : 359 - 367
  • [48] Leaf photosynthetic and morphological responses to elevated CO2 concentration and altered fruit number in the semi-closed greenhouse
    Qian, T.
    Dieleman, J. A.
    Elings, A.
    Marcelis, L. F. M.
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2012, 145 : 1 - 9
  • [49] Can grafting onto suitable rootstocks contribute to less discharge of drainage water in semi-closed soilless cultivations of tomato?
    Savvas, D.
    Tsopelopoulos, K.
    Vourdas, C.
    Chatzigiakoumis, E.
    Ropokis, A.
    Ntatsi, G.
    XI INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PROTECTED CULTIVATION IN MILD WINTER CLIMATES AND I INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON NETTINGS AND SCREENS IN HORTICULTURE, 2020, 1268 : 119 - 124
  • [50] Spatiotemporal Distributions of Energy and Water Consumption in Open, Semi-Closed and Closed Loop Heat Pump Greenhouse Systems, and Associated Management Strategies in the Canadian North
    Yildiz, I.
    Yue, J.
    Lowrey, J.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENVIRONMENT CONTROL, ENERGY-SAVING AND CROP PRODUCTION IN GREENHOUSE AND PLANT FACTORY - GREENSYS 2013, 2014, 1037 : 171 - 178