Comparison of Two Cooling and Dehumidifying Methods for a Semi-Closed Organic Tomato Greenhouse

被引:3
|
作者
Vallieres, M. [1 ]
de Halleux, D. [1 ]
Dorais, M. [2 ]
Bouzid, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[3] Jardins Nat, New Richmond, PQ G0C 2B0, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENVIRONMENT CONTROL, ENERGY-SAVING AND CROP PRODUCTION IN GREENHOUSE AND PLANT FACTORY - GREENSYS 2013 | 2014年 / 1037卷
关键词
carbon dioxide (CO2); geothermal energy; water curtain; fan coil; temperature; humidity; northern greenhouse;
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1037.78
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Two non-traditional methods of cooling and dehumidifying (C/D) were compared in a semi-closed greenhouse using cold water withdrawals from a saturated water table in order to 1) maintain the greenhouse semi-closed under high solar radiation, 2) evaluate the impact of both systems on temperature on relative air humidity (RH) and on vapor pressure deficit (VPD), 3) increase carbon dioxide levels (CO2) by limiting air external exchanges, and 4) reduce the CO2 consumption. The first studied method was a cold water fan coil system where greenhouse air was cooled through a coil on which the water vapour was condensed. The second method was a cold water curtain installed above the canopy, forcing warm humid air to condense on its surface, thus generating a free convection air movement within the greenhouse. These two heat exchanger methods were compared with the traditional natural ventilation C/D technique. The cooling capacities of both systems varied between 125 and 600 W m(-2). Under sunny summer days, higher than 838 W m(-2) for each system, the water curtain, the fan coil system and the traditional method were able to maintain set 24 h temperature (21.2, 21.2 and 21.9 degrees C), and RH (82.0, 82.4, and 77.5%) corresponding to acceptable VPD levels (0.5, 0.5 and 0.6) in the greenhouse. By maintaining closed-roofs, the water curtain and the fan coil technology maintained higher maximum levels of CO2 (1,046 and 992 mu mol mol(-1)) in the greenhouses compared to the traditional method (550 mu mol mol(-1)). During sunny days, the water curtain and the fan coil demonstrated higher maximum daily temperatures (26.6 and 29.6 degrees C), while cooler minimum temperatures during the night (18.1 and 15.8 degrees C) were observed resulting in a similar 24 h mean temperature. Compared to the water curtain, the fan coil system had the advantage of requiring low maintenance with a reduced fungal disease risk. When comparing the CO2 injection strategies, it was observed that the greenhouse using the fan coil technology injected up to 20% less than the traditional method.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 616
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tomato yield prediction in a semi-closed greenhouse
    Salazar, R.
    Lopez, I.
    Rojano, A.
    Schmidt, U.
    Dannehl, D.
    XXIX INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS ON HORTICULTURE: SUSTAINING LIVES, LIVELIHOODS AND LANDSCAPES (IHC2014): INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN PROTECTED CROPPING, 2015, 1107 : 263 - 269
  • [2] Heat Recovery Potential in a Semi-Closed Greenhouse for Tomato Cultivation
    Labihi, Abdelouhab
    Byrne, Paul
    Meslem, Amina
    Collet, Florence
    Pretot, Sylvie
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 5 (04): : 1159 - 1185
  • [3] Supplemental LED Increases Tomato Yield in Mediterranean Semi-Closed Greenhouse
    Palmitessa, Onofrio Davide
    Paciello, Paolo
    Santamaria, Pietro
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [4] Comparison of Climate between a Semi-closed and Conventional Greenhouse in the Winter Season
    Jeon, Yong Hwan
    Kim, Eun Ji
    Ju, Se Hun
    Myung, Dong-Ju
    Kim, Kyu Ha
    Lee, Soung Ju
    Na, Haeyoung
    HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 40 (04): : 400 - 409
  • [5] Response of tomato crop growth and development to a vertical temperature gradient in a semi-closed greenhouse
    Qian, T.
    Dieleman, J. A.
    Elings, A.
    De Gelder, A.
    Marcelis, L. F. M.
    JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 90 (05): : 578 - 584
  • [6] Monitoring and energetic performance of two similar semi-closed greenhouse ventilation systems
    Coomans, Mathias
    Allaerts, Koen
    Wittemans, Lieve
    Pinxteren, Dave
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 76 : 128 - 136
  • [7] Effects of Environmental Factors of Large-Scale Semi-closed Greenhouse on Growth Characteristics of Tomato
    An, Chaehong
    Park, Sungwan
    Seonwoo, Hoon
    JOURNAL OF BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2025, 50 (01) : 105 - 116
  • [8] Optimal utilization of energy equipment in a semi-closed greenhouse
    van Beveren, P. J. M.
    Bontsema, J.
    van 't Ooster, A.
    van Straten, G.
    van Henten, E. J.
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2020, 179
  • [9] Forecasting cooling load and water demand of a semi-closed greenhouse using a hybrid modelling approach
    Mahmood F.
    Govindan R.
    Yang D.
    Bermak A.
    Al-Ansari T.
    International Journal of Ambient Energy, 2022, 43 (01) : 8046 - 8066
  • [10] Water Balance and Energy Partitioning in a Semi-Closed Greenhouse
    Teitel, M.
    de Zwart, H. F.
    Kempkes, F. L. K.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES AND MANAGEMENT TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE GREENHOUSE ECOSYSTEMS: GREENSYS2011, 2012, 952 : 477 - 484