Prevalence of potential candidates for electric-acoustic stimulation implant in a hearing-impaired population

被引:1
|
作者
Saito, Kazuya [1 ]
Fujita, Takeshi [1 ,2 ]
Osaki, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Koyama, Hajime [1 ]
Shiraishi, Ko [1 ]
Kobayashi, Takaaki [1 ]
Sato, Mitsuo [1 ]
Seo, Toru [1 ]
Doi, Katsumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kindai Univ, Dept Otolaryngol, Fac Med, 377-2 Ohno Higashi, Osakasayama, Osaka 5898511, Japan
[2] Kobe Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Grad Sch Med, Chuo Ku, 7-5-1 Kusunoki Cho, Kobe, Hyogo 6500017, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Eectric-acoustic stimulation; EAS; Sensorineural hearing loss; Cochlear implant; AUDITORY-SYSTEM; HIGH-FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.anl.2019.07.006
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate the prevalence of potential electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) implant candidates in a hearing-impaired population through a review of auditory examinations. Methods: In total, 7356 patients underwent audiometric examination in our department between 2011 and 2014. The prevalence of patients meeting the audiometric criteria for EAS and standard cochlear implant (CI) was assessed. Results: The percentage of EAS implant candidates meeting the pure-tone audiometric criteria was 0.71% (n = 34) among the hearing-impaired individuals (n = 4758) examined in our department, whereas 2.52% (n = 120) met the criteria for standard CI. Among the 34 EAS implant candidates, 2 individuals (5.83%) received EAS implant surgery after approval of the EAS device in Japan. Conclusions: There was a lower prevalence of EAS implant candidates than standard CI candidates. Nevertheless, healthcare professionals should carefully examine the audiograms of patients with high frequency hearing loss with regard to meeting the indication criteria for EAS implant. This will enable patients to gain access to adequate information relating to further examinations and treatment options. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 202
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of coding strategies in electric-acoustic hearing: A simulation dedicated to EAS cochlear implant, in the presence of noise
    Seldran, Fabien
    Gallego, Stephane
    Hung Thai-Van
    Berger-Vachon, Christian
    APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 2014, 76 : 300 - 309
  • [22] Evaluation of an electrode design for the combined electric-acoustic stimulation
    Adunka, O
    Kiefer, J
    Unkelbach, MH
    Radeloff, A
    Lehnert, T
    Gstöttner, W
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2004, 83 (10) : 653 - 658
  • [23] Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation
    Helbig, Silke
    Adel, Youssef
    Rader, Tobias
    Stoever, Timo
    Baumann, Uwe
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2016, 37 (09) : E353 - E359
  • [24] Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison
    Rader, Tobias
    Adel, Youssef
    Fastl, Hugo
    Baumann, Uwe
    EAR AND HEARING, 2015, 36 (06) : E314 - E325
  • [25] Electric-Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System: A Review of the First Decade
    von Ilberg, Christoph A.
    Baumann, Uwe
    Kiefer, Jan
    Tillein, Jochen
    Adunka, Oliver F.
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2011, 16 : 1 - 30
  • [26] Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation
    Koertje, Monika
    Baumann, Uwe
    Stoever, Timo
    Weissgerber, Tobias
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [27] Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing
    Brown, Christopher A.
    Bacon, Sid P.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 125 (03) : 1658 - 1665
  • [28] The effect of cross-over frequency on binaural hearing performance of adults using electric-acoustic stimulation
    Incerti, Paola, V
    Ching, Teresa Yc
    Cowan, Robert
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 20 (04) : 190 - 206
  • [29] Changing Realities in the Classroom for Hearing-Impaired Children with Cochlear Implant
    Vermeulen, Anneke
    De Raeve, Leo
    Langereis, Margreet
    Snik, Ad
    DEAFNESS & EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 14 (01) : 36 - 47
  • [30] Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation. Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions
    Rader, T.
    HNO, 2015, 63 (02) : 85 - 93