Multi criteria analysis of multi-sources photovoltaic electrical structures in isolated sites

被引:2
作者
Azzouz, Imen [1 ]
Hammami, Ines [2 ]
Brik, Kais [3 ]
Ben Ammar, Faouzi [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl High Sch Engn Tunis, Res Lab Mat, Measurements & Applicat, Tunis, Tunisia
[2] Univ Carthage, Natl High Sch Engn Mateur, Mat Res Lab, Measurements & Applicat, Tunis, Tunisia
[3] Univ Manouba, Res Lab Mat, Measurements & Applicat, Higher Inst Multimedia Arts Manouba, Manouba, Tunisia
[4] Univ Carthage, Res Lab Mat, Measurements & Applicat, Natl Inst Appl Sci & Technol, Tunis, Tunisia
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED SYSTEMS AND EMERGENT TECHNOLOGIES IC_ASET'2022) | 2022年
关键词
photovoltaic electrical structures; multi-criteria analysis; life time; power availabilty; installation complexity; cost;
D O I
10.1109/IC_ASET53395.2022.9765888
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Multi-source photovoltaic system structures, play an important role in photovoltaic installations especially in isolated sites. However, requirements in terms of performance, power availability and lifetime have to meet the consumption requirements for their integration. In this context, authors propose a consistent approach to improve the choice of an adequate electrical topology of a multi-source photovoltaic system located in an isolated site. This approach is essentially performed by applying a multi-criteria analysis based on a comparison study including four criteria. Four different multi-source photovoltaic system structures are compared according to their life-time, power availability, installation complexity and cost. The comparison process is performed by applying the multi-criteria decision method PROMETHEE II.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 350
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Analysis of the critical failure modes and developing an aging assessment methodology for lithium iron phosphate batteries
    Azzouz, Imen
    Yahmadi, Raja
    Brik, Kais
    Ben Ammar, Faouzi
    [J]. ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 104 (01) : 27 - 43
  • [2] OUTRANKING METHODS: PROMETHEE I AND PROMETHEE II
    Goswami, Shankha Shubhra
    [J]. FOUNDATIONS OF MANAGEMENT, 2020, 12 (01) : 93 - 110
  • [3] Sensitivity Analysis of PROMETHEE II for the Evaluation of Environmental Websites
    Kabassi, Katerina
    Martinis, Aristotelis
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (19):
  • [4] An Extended PROMETHE II Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Technique Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic for Sustainable Energy Planning
    Montajabiha, Mahsa
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2016, 25 (02) : 221 - 244
  • [5] Hybrid power systems - Sizes, efficiencies, and economics
    Rehman, Shafiqur
    [J]. ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2021, 39 (01) : 3 - 43
  • [6] Review of hybrid renewable energy systems with comparative analysis of off-grid hybrid system
    Sawle, Yashwant
    Gupta, S. C.
    Bohre, Aashish Kumar
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 81 : 2217 - 2235
  • [7] Best criteria selection based PROMETHEE II method
    Singh, Anjali
    Gupta, Anjana
    Mehra, Aparna
    [J]. OPSEARCH, 2021, 58 (01) : 160 - 180
  • [8] Optimal operation of hybrid energy system for intelligent ship: An ultrahigh-dimensional model and control method
    Tang, Ruoli
    An, Qing
    Xu, Fan
    Zhang, Xiaodi
    Li, Xin
    Lai, Jingang
    Dong, Zhengcheng
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 211
  • [9] A review of multi-energy hybrid power system for ships
    Yuan, Yupeng
    Wang, Jixiang
    Yan, Xinping
    Shen, Boyang
    Long, Teng
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 132