Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the lateral-prone position: Experience of 124 cases in a single center

被引:14
|
作者
Ma, Shaohua [1 ]
Yan, Tianshen [1 ]
Liu, Dandan [1 ]
Wang, Keyi [1 ]
Wang, Jingdi [1 ]
Song, Jintao [1 ]
Wang, Tong [1 ]
He, Wei [1 ]
Bai, Jie [1 ]
Jin, Liang [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Thorac Surg, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
Esophageal cancer; laparoscopic; thoracoscope; THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; CANCER; OUTCOMES; METAANALYSIS; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/1759-7714.12524
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy was first introduced as a new technique for esophageal cancer treatment 20 years ago. Performing this procedure in the lateral-prone position is the most appropriate method. Since May 2013, our center has performed 124 esophageal cancer operations using this procedure. Herein, we share our experience. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 124 consecutive patients who had received minimally invasive esophagectomy in the lateral-prone position from May 2013 to June 2017. The procedure, operative variables, postoperative complications, and oncology outcomes were assessed. Results: The surgery was successful in all 124 patients; three cases converted to an abdominal opening procedure during surgery. The mean total lymph node harvest was 19.2: 12.9 in the thoracic cavity and 6.0 in the abdominal cavity. The average total operation duration was 376 minutes and blood loss was 156 mL. No mortality occurred within 30 postoperative days. Forty-three cases of postoperative morbidity occurred in 38 patients (30.6%), including 11 anastomotic leakages (8.9%), 1 chyle leak (0.8%), 12 lateral recurrent nerve palsies (9.7%), 11 pulmonary complications (8.9%), and 8 other complications (6.5%). A learning curve indicated that blood loss, operation duration, and the number of lymph nodes harvested would improve with time. Conclusions: Surgical and oncological outcomes following minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were acceptable. There are some advantages to this technique compared to previous reports of opening procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 43
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: experience of 200 cases in a single center
    Zheng Haitao
    Xu Jie
    Jiang Lixin
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2014, 9 (03) : 337 - 343
  • [42] Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-Shanghai Chest Hospital experience
    Li, Bin
    Yang, Yu
    Sun, Yifeng
    Hua, Rong
    Hang, Xiaobin
    Guo, Xufeng
    Gu, Haiyong
    Ye, Bo
    Li, Zhigang
    Mao, Teng
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 (06) : 3800 - 3807
  • [43] Selected Commentary to "Fifty-five minimally invasive esophagectomies: a single center experience"
    Bonavina, L.
    EUROPEAN SURGERY-ACTA CHIRURGICA AUSTRIACA, 2009, 41 (04): : 194 - 198
  • [44] Application of full lateral decubitus position with cephalic parallel approach in robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Zhu, Yunuke
    Ma, Lin
    Liu, Lunxu
    Lin, Yidan
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2019, 11 (08) : 3250 - 3256
  • [45] Thoracic duct identification with indocyanine green fluorescence during minimally invasive esophagectomy with patient in prone position
    Vecchiato, Massimo
    Martino, Antonio
    Sponza, Massimo
    Uzzau, Alessandro
    Ziccarelli, Antonio
    Marchesi, Federico
    Petri, Roberto
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2020, 33 (12)
  • [46] Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience)
    van der Sluis, Pieter Christiaan
    Tagkalos, Evangelos
    Hadzijusufovic, Edin
    Babic, Benjamin
    Uzun, Eren
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    Lang, Hauke
    Grimminger, Peter Philipp
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 25 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [47] Comparison of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: A propensity-matched study from a single high-volume institution
    Ekeke, Chigozirim N.
    Kuiper, Gino M.
    Luketich, James D.
    Ruppert, Kristine M.
    Copelli, Susan J.
    Baker, Nicholas
    Levy, Ryan M.
    Awais, Omar
    Christie, Neil A.
    Dhupar, Rajeev
    Pennathur, Arjun
    Sarkaria, Inderpal S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 166 (02) : 374 - +
  • [48] Successful transition from open to minimally invasive approach in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience in Japan
    Kanamori, Jun
    Watanabe, Masayuki
    Kozuki, Ryotaro
    Toihata, Tasuku
    Otake, Reiko
    Takahashi, Keita
    Okamura, Akihiko
    Imamura, Yu
    Mine, Shinji
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2021, 406 (05) : 1407 - 1414
  • [49] Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in 1023 consecutive esophageal cancer patients: a single-center experience
    Xiao-Dong Zheng
    Shi-Cong Li
    Chao Lu
    Wei-Ming Zhang
    Jian-Bin Hou
    Ke-Feng Shi
    Peng Zhang
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 17
  • [50] Minimally invasive triple valve surgery: A single center experience
    Moront, Michael G.
    Kuehne, Michael
    Redfern, Roberta E.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (10) : 2567 - 2573