Cost-sensitive three-way class-specific attribute reduction

被引:45
作者
Ma, Xi-Ao [1 ]
Zhao, Xue Rong [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Comp & Informat Engn, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] South Cent Univ Nationalities, Sch Math & Stat, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cost-sensitive three-way decision; Attribute reduction; Decision-theoretic rough set; ROUGH SET MODEL; DECISION; FUZZY; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijar.2018.11.014
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The theory of rough sets provides a method to construct three types of classification rules, leading to three-way decisions. From such a point of view, we introduce the concept of cost-sensitive three-way class-specific attribute reducts. Based on the semantics of the three-way decisions, we introduce a monotonic result cost in decision-theoretic rough set model, called the result cost of three-way decisions. We provide a critical analysis of classification-based attribute reducts from result-cost-sensitive and test-cost-sensitive perspectives. On this basis, we propose class-specific cost-sensitive attribute reduction approaches. More specifically, we define a class-specific minimum cost reduct. The objective of attribute reduction is to minimize result cost and test cost with respect to a particular decision class. We design two algorithms for constructing a family of class-specific minimum cost reducts based on addition-deletion strategy and deletion strategy, respectively. The experimental results indicate that the result cost of three-way decisions is monotonic with respect to the set inclusion of attributes and the class-specific minimum cost reducts can make a better trade-off between misclassification cost and test cost with respect to a particular decision class. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 174
页数:22
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter, DOI 10.1145/1656274.1656278
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Granular Computing: Analysis and Design of Intelligent Systems
[3]  
Bagenstoss PM, 1999, IEEE T SIGNAL PROCES, V47, P3428, DOI 10.1109/78.806092
[4]   Local reduction of decision system with fuzzy rough sets [J].
Chen Degang ;
Zhao Suyun .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2010, 161 (13) :1871-1883
[5]  
Elkan C., 2001, P 17 INT JOINT C ART, P973
[6]   Parameterized rough set model using rough membership and Bayesian confirmation measures [J].
Greco, Salvatore ;
Matarazzo, Benedetto ;
Slowinski, Roman .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2008, 49 (02) :285-300
[7]   Hybrid attribute reduction based on a novel fuzzy-rough model and information granulation [J].
Hu, Qinghua ;
Xie, Zongxia ;
Yu, Daren .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2007, 40 (12) :3509-3521
[8]   Cost-sensitive three-way recommendations by learning pair-wise preferences [J].
Huang, Jiajin ;
Wang, Jian ;
Yao, Yiyu ;
Zhong, Ning .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2017, 86 :28-40
[9]   Minimum cost attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models [J].
Jia, Xiuyi ;
Liao, Wenhe ;
Tang, Zhenmin ;
Shang, Lin .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 219 :151-167
[10]   An incremental attribute reduction approach based on knowledge granularity under the attribute generalization [J].
Jing, Yunge ;
Li, Tianrui ;
Huang, Junfu ;
Zhang, Yingying .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2016, 76 :80-95