Impact of a Rapid Respiratory Panel Test on Patient Outcomes

被引:187
作者
Rogers, Beverly B. [1 ,5 ]
Shankar, Prabhu [6 ]
Jerris, Robert C. [1 ,5 ]
Kotzbauer, David [2 ]
Anderson, Evan J. [2 ,7 ]
Watson, J. Renee [3 ]
O'Brien, Lauren A. [4 ]
Uwindatwa, Francine [1 ]
McNamara, Kelly [4 ]
Bost, James E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Healthcare Atlanta, Dept Pathol, Atlanta, GA 30342 USA
[2] Childrens Healthcare Atlanta, Dept Pediat, Atlanta, GA 30342 USA
[3] Childrens Healthcare Atlanta, Dept Infect Control, Atlanta, GA 30342 USA
[4] Childrens Healthcare Atlanta, Dept Stat, Atlanta, GA 30342 USA
[5] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[6] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
VIRAL PANEL;
D O I
10.5858/arpa.2014-0257-OA
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Context.-Evolution of polymerase chain reaction testing for infectious pathogens has occurred concurrent with a focus on value-based medicine. Objective.-To determine if implementation of the FilmArray rapid respiratory panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, Utah) (hereafter RRP), with a shorter time to the test result and expanded panel, results in different outcomes for children admitted to the hospital with an acute respiratory tract illness. Design.-Patient outcomes were compared before implementation of the RRP (November 1, 2011, to January 31, 2012) versus after implementation of the RRP (November 1, 2012, to January 31, 2013). The study included inpatients 3 months or older with an acute respiratory tract illness, most admitted through the emergency department. Testing before RRP implementation used batched polymerase chain reaction analysis for respiratory syncytial virus and influenza A and B, with additional testing for parainfluenza 1 through 3 in approximately 11% of patients and for human metapneumovirus in less than 1% of patients. The RRP tested for respiratory syncytial virus, influenza A and B, parainfluenza 1 through 4, human metapneumovirus, adenovirus, rhinovirus/enterovirus, and coronavirus NL62. Results.-The pre-RRP group had 365 patients, and the post-RRP group had 771 patients. After RRP implementation, the mean time to the test result was shorter (383 minutes versus 1119 minutes, P < .001), and the percentage of patients with a result in the emergency department was greater (51.6% versus 13.4%, P < .001). There was no difference in whether antibiotics were prescribed, but the duration of antibiotic use was shorter after RRP implementation (P = .003) and was dependent on receiving test results within 4 hours. If the test result was positive, the inpatient length of stay (P = .03) and the time in isolation (P = .03) were decreased after RRP implementation compared with before RRP implementation. Conclusions.-The RRP decreases the duration of antibiotic use, the length of inpatient stay, and the time in isolation.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 641
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], BEST CARE LOWER COST
  • [2] [Anonymous], BEST CAR LOW COST PA
  • [3] Clinical and financial benefits of rapid detection of respiratory viruses: an outcomes study
    Barenfanger, J
    Drake, C
    Leon, N
    Mueller, T
    Troutt, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 38 (08) : 2824 - 2828
  • [4] Evaluation of the FilmArray® Respiratory Panel for Clinical Use in a Large Children's Hospital
    Couturier, Marc Roger
    Barney, Trenda
    Alger, Garrison
    Hymas, Weston C.
    Stevenson, Jeffery B.
    Hillyard, David
    Daly, Judy A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2013, 27 (02) : 148 - 154
  • [5] Principles of Judicious Antibiotic Prescribing for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in Pediatrics
    Hersh, Adam L.
    Jackson, Mary Anne
    Hicks, Lauri A.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2013, 132 (06) : 1146 - 1154
  • [6] FilmArray® respiratory panel performance in respiratory samples from neonatal care units
    Piralla, Antonio
    Lunghi, Giovanna
    Percivalle, Elena
    Vigano, Cristina
    Nasta, Teresa
    Pugni, Lorenza
    Mosca, Fabio
    Stronati, Mauro
    Torresani, Erminio
    Baldanti, Fausto
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2014, 79 (02) : 183 - 186
  • [7] Impact of a diagnostic cerebrospinal fluid enterovirus polymerase chain reaction test on patient management
    Ramers, C
    Billman, G
    Hartin, M
    Ho, S
    Sawyer, MH
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (20): : 2680 - 2685
  • [8] Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel and the GenMark eSensor Respiratory Viral Panel on Lower Respiratory Tract Specimens
    Ruggiero, Phyllis
    McMillen, Tracy
    Tang, Yi-Wei
    Babady, N. Esther
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 52 (01) : 288 - 290
  • [9] Implementation of FilmArray Respiratory Viral Panel in a Core Laboratory Improves Testing Turnaround Time and Patient Care
    Xu, Min
    Qin, Xuan
    Astion, Michael L.
    Rutledge, Joe C.
    Simpson, Joanne
    Jerome, Keith R.
    Englund, Janet A.
    Zerr, Danielle M.
    Migita, Russell T.
    Rich, Shannon
    Childs, John C.
    Cent, Anne
    Del Beccaro, Mark A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 139 (01) : 118 - 123