Effects of magnetic resonance imaging fields on upper eyelid implants

被引:3
|
作者
Schrom, T
Bauknecht, H
Berghaus, A
Scherer, H
机构
[1] Univ Med Berlin, Klin Hals Nasen Ohrenkrankheiten, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Med Berlin, Inst Radiol, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Munich, Klin & Poliklin Hals Nasen Ohrenkrankheiten, Munich, Germany
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; lid implant; gold; platinum; platinum/iridium;
D O I
10.1007/s00106-004-1203-0
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background. For the therapy of lagophthalmos in facial palsy, gold (99.99%), platinum (99.95%) and platinum/iridium(97%/3%) alloy weights are implanted into the upper eyelid. Investigations on the MRI compatibility of the different eyelid implants with 1.5 and 3.0Tesla-MRT-systems, which are often used for the diagnosis of head and neck tumours, are still missing. Methods. Three different eyelid implants made of pure gold, pure platinum and a platinum/iridium alloy were tested in vitro. As parameters, temperature changes, movements of the implants and picture artefacts of the different implants were determined using a 1.5 and 3.0Tesla MR system. The deflection forces of the implants were evaluated by thread test, lying in a Petri dish and floating in a water bath. Results. No rise in temperature was recorded in any implant. On the water surface, all three implants changed their positions and floated towards the magnetic field. The velocity of the implants increased in the 3.0Tesla system. Increasing the frictional resistance by lying the implants in a Petri dish, there was no movement in the 1.5 or 3.0Tesla systems. In addition, no movement of the implants could be observed in the thread test. All implants made few artefacts, with gold showing the least artefacts. Conclusion. MR imaging at 1.5 or 3.0Tesla may be performed safely for warming up or dislocation of the implant in patients with eyelid implants made of pure gold, pure platinum or a platinum/iridium alloy.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 746
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AND OTOLOGIC IMPLANTS
    HOWARD, PE
    REAMS, CL
    KURLAND, R
    WRIGHT, J
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1986, : 103 - 103
  • [22] Magnetic resonance imaging after cochlear implants
    Bawazeer, Naif
    Vuong, Hella
    Riehm, Sophie
    Veillon, Francis
    Charpiot, Anne
    JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 2019, 14 (01) : 22 - 25
  • [23] Magnetic resonance imaging in inhomogeneous fields
    Epstein, CL
    INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2004, 20 (03) : 753 - 780
  • [24] Magnetic Resonance Imaging at Ultrahigh Fields
    Ugurbil, Kamil
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 61 (05) : 1364 - 1379
  • [25] Magnetic resonance imaging of ultrasonic fields
    Waker, CL
    Foster, FS
    Plewes, DB
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 24 (01): : 137 - 142
  • [26] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF THE EYELID COMPLEX - ANATOMY AND PATHOLOGY
    MATURI, RK
    SOPARKAR, CNS
    PATRINELY, JR
    HAYMAN, LA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1995, 36 (04) : S501 - S501
  • [27] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF EYELID SPRINGS AND GOLD WEIGHTS
    GARDNER, TA
    RAK, KM
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1991, 109 (11) : 1498 - 1498
  • [28] EFFECT OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING ON IMPLANTABLE EYELID WEIGHTS
    MARRA, S
    KONIOR, TJ
    LEONETTI, JP
    RASLAN, W
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1995, 104 (06): : 448 - 452
  • [29] Anatomic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Correction of Upper-Eyelid Depression and Blepharoptosis in Senile Patients
    Li, Pengcheng
    Li, Kongying
    Li, Silei
    Wang, Yongqian
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 34 (03) : E321 - E325
  • [30] Measurement of upper eyelid implants curvature by ultrasound
    Schrom, T
    Bloching, M
    Wernecke, K
    Scherer, H
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (05): : 884 - 888