Ancillary benefits of climate policy in a small open economy: The case of Sweden

被引:21
作者
Riekkola, Anna Krook [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ahlgren, Erik O. [2 ]
Soderholm, Patrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, Econ Unit, SE-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Environm & Energy Dept, Div Energy Technol, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Energy, NL-1755 ZG Petten, Netherlands
关键词
Ancillary benefits; Climate policy; Swedish energy system; AIR-POLLUTION; ELECTRICITY; GENERATION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.015
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is increasingly recognised that GHG reduction policies can have important ancillary benefits in the form of positive local and regional environmental impacts. The purpose of this paper is to estimate the domestic ancillary pollution benefits of climate policy in Sweden, and investigate how these are affected by different climate policy designs. The latter differ primarily in terms of how the country chooses to meet a specific target and where the necessary emission reductions take place. The analysis relies on simulations within the energy system optimisation model TIMES-Sweden, and focuses on four non-GHG pollutants: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Non Methane Volatile Organic Compounds (NMVOC), inhalable particles (PM2.5), and Sulphur dioxide (SO2). The simulations permit detailed assessments of the respective technology and fuel choices that underlie any net changes in the estimated ancillary effects. The results indicate that the ancillary benefits constitute a far from insignificant share of total system costs, and this share appears to be highest in the scenarios that entail the largest emission reductions domestically. This result reflects the fact that carbon dioxide emission reductions abroad also implies a lost opportunity of achieving substantial domestic welfare gain from the reductions of regional and local environmental pollutants. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4985 / 4998
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] International trade and the distribution of economy-wide benefits from the disbursement of climate finance
    Victoria Roman, Maria
    Arto, Inaki
    Ansuategi, Alberto
    CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 11 (08) : 639 - 654
  • [42] Climate change and the new world economy: Implications for the nature and timing of policy responses
    Sheehan, Peter
    Jones, Roger N.
    Jolley, Ainsley
    Preston, Benjamin L.
    Clarke, Matthew
    Durack, Paul J.
    Islam, Sardar M. N.
    Whetton, Penny H.
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2008, 18 (03): : 380 - 396
  • [43] Oil shale and climate policy in the shift to a low carbon and more resilient economy
    Pasqualini, D.
    Bassi, A. M.
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2014, 86 : 168 - 176
  • [44] Integrating behavioural economics into climate-economy models: some policy lessons
    Safarzynska, Karolina
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2018, 18 (04) : 485 - 498
  • [45] Co-benefits of China's climate policy for air quality and human health in China and transboundary regions in 2030
    Li, Mingwei
    Zhang, Da
    Li, Chiao-Ting
    Selin, Noelle E.
    Karplus, Valerie J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (08)
  • [46] Policy options in a worst case climate change world
    Swart, Rob
    Marinova, Natasha
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2010, 15 (06) : 531 - 549
  • [47] The constrained influence of discourses: the case of Norwegian climate policy
    Tellmann, Silje Maria
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2012, 21 (05) : 734 - 752
  • [48] Policy Stability in Climate Governance: The case of the United Kingdom
    Rietig, Katharina
    Laing, Timothy
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2017, 27 (06) : 575 - 587
  • [49] Policy options in a worst case climate change world
    Rob Swart
    Natasha Marinova
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2010, 15 : 531 - 549
  • [50] The Use of Intangible Benefits for Promoting Contested Policies: The Case of Geopolitical Benefits and the Israeli Gas Policy
    Fischhendler, Itay
    GEOPOLITICS, 2018, 23 (04) : 929 - 953