Analysis of dual secondary injection for thrust vectoring

被引:0
|
作者
Mohammadi, Elham [1 ]
Toloei, Alireza [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Aerosp Dept, Tehran, Iran
来源
关键词
Fluid mechanics; Flow; Fuel; Turbulent flow; Forces; Dual secondary injection; Thrust vector control; Computational fluid dynamics; Side force; Convergent-divergent nozzle;
D O I
10.1108/00022661111138620
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the flowfield structure and performance of dual secondary injection system for thrust vectoring in a convergent-divergent nozzle and to compare it with a single secondary injection system. Design/methodology/approach - Dual secondary injection for thrust vectoring in a convergent-divergent nozzle is studied by solving three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations by the means of Fluent. Realizable k-epsilon turbulent model with enhanced wall-treatment approach is used for viscous model. Density-based solver and explicit scheme are employed in the computational model. In order to study the effect of injection location on the flowfield, distance between ports is considered as the key variable. Findings - Results show that under some circumstances, dual secondary injection system is more effective than a single injection system with the same mass flow rate. The study shows that when the distance between two ports is 8.5 times of the injection port's diameter (or more) and in the same time the first injection port is at least 1 throat diameter far from the nozzle throat, this system will show a better performance. In addition, this system reduces the probability of bow shock impingement to the opposite wall and consequently, the side force production has less limitation. Practical implications - Dual secondary injection for thrust vector control (SITVC) needs less secondary flow and therefore it makes less reduction in the primary thrust. It means that for a specific primary thrust, less mass fuel is needed which makes it more economic regarding the traditional SITVC systems. Originality/value - The paper's value lies in using a three-dimensional model to study the effect of two ports distance on SITVC performance and comparison among the performance of dual and single injections when there is an impingement.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 220
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integrating thrust vectoring with flight control
    Bokulich, F
    AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 1999, 19 (03) : 10 - 10
  • [42] Effect of Bypass Duct on the Thrust Vectoring Performance of Dual Throat Nozzle in a Supersonic Aircraft
    Afridi, Saadia
    Khan, Tariq Amin
    Shah, Imran
    Ali, Yasir
    Mumtaz Qadri, Muhammad Nafees
    Li, Wei
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2024, 146 (06):
  • [43] Fluidic Thrust Vectoring of Engine Nozzle
    Rakesh, R. B.
    Varghese, Sijo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODERN RESEARCH IN AEROSPACE ENGINEERING (MARE-2016), 2018, : 43 - 51
  • [44] Integrating thrust vectoring with flight control
    Aerosp Eng (Warrendale PA), 3 (10):
  • [45] Thrust Vectoring system control concept
    Jiménez, A
    Icaza, D
    ALGORITHMS AND ARCHITECTURES FOR REAL-TIME CONTROL 2000, 2000, : 235 - 244
  • [46] Counterflow thrust vectoring of supersonic jets
    Strykowski, PJ
    Krothapalli, A
    Forliti, DJ
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1996, 34 (11) : 2306 - 2314
  • [47] Investigation of fluidic thrust vectoring for scramjets
    Hambidge, Chris
    Ivison, William
    Steuer, David
    Neely, Andrew
    McGilvray, Matthew
    EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2023, 64 (04)
  • [48] Windshear recovery using thrust vectoring
    Visser, HG
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 71 (04): : 329 - 336
  • [49] Investigation of fluidic thrust vectoring for scramjets
    Chris Hambidge
    William Ivison
    David Steuer
    Andrew Neely
    Matthew McGilvray
    Experiments in Fluids, 2023, 64
  • [50] Feedback control for counterflow thrust vectoring
    Collins, EG
    Zhao, YN
    Alvi, F
    Alidu, MI
    Strykowski, PJ
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2004, : 3654 - 3659