Integrating the three-line environmental governance and environmental sustainability evaluation of urban industry in China

被引:23
|
作者
Cheng, Runhe [1 ]
Li, Wei [1 ]
Lu, Zhouyangfan [1 ]
Zhou, Siyang [1 ]
Meng, Chong [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Water Environm Simulat, 19 Xinjiekouwai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental sustainability; Three-line environmental governance; Restraining indicators; Alternative evaluation; Urban industry; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; DEVELOPMENT GOALS; INDICATORS; AIR; FRAMEWORK; HEALTH; MODEL; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121554
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rapid industrial growth has significantly contributed to the prosperity of Chinese cities over the past decades. Current studies on environmental sustainability (ES) focused on industrial systems, which are the main source of pollution emission, water use, and energy consumption in cities. In light of the weakness of conventional methods in correlating relevant environmental management with ES evaluation, a methodology was developed primarily to improve the evaluation indicators and procedure by integrating the latest three-line environmental governance (TLEG) policy and the ES evaluation of urban industry in China. Specifically, a four-dimensional indicator system was built in a hierarchical structure based on the requirements of TLEG on aspects of ecology, environment, and resource; further, a problem-solving procedure was developed to continuously determine the progress of the industrial ES of the Nansha industrial base (NSIB) in Guangzhou, China. An ad hoc retrospective evaluation was developed to investigate the variations of ES performance of the NSIB from 2005 to 2017 and further to identify a set of restraining indicators exhibiting negative effects on ES. Five alternatives of the industrial upgrading plan up to 2025 were assessed based on the accessibility of ES targets, and the best one was selected against the restraining indicators. The results indicated that the general trend of ES of NSIB was progressive from 2005 to 2017, 13 restraining indicators out of 33 were deemed as key, and Alternative IV was screened out as the best one. This study indicated that such integration with environmental management policies may set up a goal-oriented, problem-solving process for ES evaluation. Further, it may increase the potential to deliver more relevant information for decision-making on the greening industrial systems of cities. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental sustainability of milk production: a comparative environmental impact analysis and sustainability evaluation
    Singh, Alok Bihari
    Bhakar, Vikrant
    Gaurav, Gaurav
    Khandelwal, Chandni
    Sarkar, Prabir
    Singh, Harpreet
    Dangayach, Govind Sharan
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 5
  • [32] Digital transformation and environmental sustainability in the hospitality industry: A three-wave time-lagged examination
    Bekele, Henok
    Raj, Sahil
    Singh, Amanpreet
    Joshi, Mahesh
    Kajla, Tanveer
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 484
  • [33] Moving towards urban sustainability in Kenya: a framework for integration of environmental, economic, social and governance dimensions
    Mutisya, Emmanuel
    Yarime, Masaru
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2014, 9 (02) : 205 - 215
  • [34] Top managers' environmental values, leadership, and stakeholder engagement in promoting environmental sustainability in the restaurant industry
    Jang, Yoon Jung
    Zheng, Tianshu
    Bosselman, Robert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2017, 63 : 101 - 111
  • [35] Environmental sustainability and Beautiful China: A study of indicator identification and provincial evaluation
    Guan, Yang
    Qiang, Ye
    Qu, Yuanyuan
    Lu, Wentao
    Xiao, Yang
    Chu, Chengjun
    Xiong, Shangao
    Shao, Chaofeng
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2024, 105
  • [36] Sustainability performance for Brazilian electricity power industry: An assessment integrating social, economic and environmental issues
    Sartori, Simone
    Witjes, Sjors
    Campos, Lucila M. S.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 111 : 41 - 51
  • [37] Moving towards urban sustainability in Kenya: a framework for integration of environmental, economic, social and governance dimensions
    Emmanuel Mutisya
    Masaru Yarime
    Sustainability Science, 2014, 9 : 205 - 215
  • [38] Sustainability indicators for municipalities of megacities: Integrating health, safety and environmental performance
    Mapar, Mahsa
    Jafari, Mohammad Javad
    Mansouri, Nabiollah
    Arjmandi, Reza
    Azizinejad, Reza
    Ramos, Tomas B.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 83 : 271 - 291
  • [39] Study on the spatial differentiation of environmental governance performance of Yangtze river urban agglomeration in Jiangsu province of China
    Peng, Benhong
    Chen, Hong
    Elahi, Ehsan
    Wei, Guo
    LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 99
  • [40] Public-private governance patterns and environmental sustainability
    Palmujoki E.
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2006, 8 (1) : 1 - 17