Magnitude of risks and benefits of the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer patients: Meta-regression analysis of randomized trials

被引:30
|
作者
Cuppone, Federica [1 ]
Bria, Emilio [1 ,2 ]
Vaccaro, Vanja [1 ]
Puglisi, Fabio [3 ]
Fabi, Alessandra [1 ]
Sperduti, Isabella [4 ]
Carlini, Paolo [1 ]
Milella, Michele [1 ]
Nistico, Cecilia [1 ]
Russillo, Michelangelo [1 ]
Papaldo, Paola [1 ]
Ferretti, Gianluigi [1 ]
Aapro, Matti [5 ]
Giannarelli, Diana [4 ]
Cognetti, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Dept Med Oncol, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Verona, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp Udine, Dept Med Oncol, Udine, Italy
[4] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Biostat Sci Direct, Rome, Italy
[5] Clin Genolier, Inst Multidisciplinaire Oncol, Genolier, Switzerland
关键词
ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; PHASE-III TRIAL; COMBINATION; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; CAPECITABINE; PACLITAXEL; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1186/1756-9966-30-54
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Although the addition of bevacizumab significantly improves the efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer, regulatory concerns still exist with regard to the magnitude of the benefits and the overall safety profile. Methods: A literature-based meta-analysis to quantify the magnitude of benefit and safety of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer patients was conducted. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were also performed to identify additional predictors of outcome and to assess the influence of trial design. Results: Five trials (3,841 patients) were gathered. A significant interaction according to treatment line was found for progression-free survival (PFS, p = 0.027); PFS was significantly improved for 1(st) line (Hazard Ratio, HR 0.68, p < 0.0001), with a 1-yr absolute difference (AD) of 8.4% (number needed to treat, NNT 12). A non-significant trend was found in overall survival (OS), and in PFS for 2(nd) line. Responses were improved with the addition of bevacizumab, without interaction between 1(st) line (Relative Risk, RR 1.46, p < 0.0001) and 2(nd) line (RR 1.58, p = 0.05). The most important toxicity was hypertension, accounting for a significant AD of 4.5% against bevacizumab (number needed to harm, NNH 22). Other significant, although less clinically meaningful, adverse events were proteinuria, neurotoxicity, febrile neutropenia, and bleeding. At the meta-regression analysis for 1(st)-line, more than 3 metastatic sites (p = 0.032), no adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.00013), negative hormonal receptor status (p = 0.009), and prior anthracyclines-exposure (p = 0.019), did significantly affect PFS. Conclusions: Although with heterogeneity, the addition of bevacizumab to 1(st)-line chemotherapy significantly improves PFS, and overall activity. Hypertension should be weighted with the overall benefit on the individual basis.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer in Elderly and Non-elderly Patients: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Chang, Seong-Hwan
    Kim, Soo-Nyung
    Choi, Hye Jung
    Park, Misuk
    Kim, Rock Bum
    Go, Se-Il
    Lee, Won Sup
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 49 (01): : 263 - 273
  • [32] Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Coccolini, F.
    Cotte, E.
    Glehen, O.
    Lotti, M.
    Poiasina, E.
    Catena, F.
    Yonemura, Y.
    Ansaloni, L.
    EJSO, 2014, 40 (01): : 12 - 26
  • [33] Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for glioblastoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yang, Shou-Bo
    Gao, Kai-Di
    Jiang, Tao
    Cheng, Shu-Jun
    Li, Wen-Bin
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (34) : 57337 - 57344
  • [34] The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis based on published phase III trials
    Fang, Yuan
    Qu, Xinlan
    Cheng, Boran
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Wang, Zhenmeng
    Chen, Fangfang
    Xiong, Bin
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (03) : 1933 - 1941
  • [35] A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with chemotherapy alone in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Cao, Yunfei
    Tan, Aihua
    Gao, Feng
    Liu, Lidan
    Liao, Cun
    Mo, Zengnan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 24 (06) : 677 - 685
  • [36] Adjuvant Chemotherapy, with or without Taxanes, in Early or Operable Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 19 Randomized Trials with 30698 Patients
    Qin, Ying-Yi
    Li, Hui
    Guo, Xiao-Jing
    Ye, Xiao-Fei
    Wei, Xin
    Zhou, Yu-Hao
    Zhang, Xin-Ji
    Wang, Chao
    Qian, Wei
    Lu, Jian
    He, Jia
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11):
  • [37] A network meta-analysis for toxicity of eight chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of metastatic/advanced breast cancer
    Zhang, Xiao-Hua
    Hao, Shuai
    Gao, Bo
    Tian, Wu-Guo
    Jiang, Yan
    Zhang, Shu
    Guo, Ling-Ji
    Luo, Dong-Lin
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (51) : 84533 - 84543
  • [38] Fulvestrant in the treatment of advanced breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Valachis, Antonis
    Mauri, Davide
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    Mavroudis, Dimitris
    Georgoulias, Vassilis
    Casazza, Giovanni
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2010, 73 (03) : 220 - 227
  • [39] The efficacy of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Xuan
    Huang, Chun
    Li, Man
    Gu, Yanjun
    Cui, Yanfen
    Li, Yan
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (05) : 4841 - 4848
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of taxanes combined with chemotherapy drugs in advanced triple negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis of 26 randomized controlled trials
    Huang, Qionglian
    Mei, Zubing
    Han, Xianghui
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12