Effect of the upper instrumented vertebral level (upper vs. lower thoracic spine) on gait ability after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity

被引:8
|
作者
Yagi, Mitsuru [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fujita, Nobuyuki [2 ,3 ]
Tsuji, Osahiko [2 ,3 ]
Nagoshi, Narihito [2 ,3 ]
Yato, Yoshiyuki [1 ]
Asazuma, Takashi [1 ]
Ishii, Ken [2 ,3 ]
Nakamura, Masaya [2 ,3 ]
Matsumoto, Morio [2 ,3 ]
Watanabe, Kota [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Hosp Org, Dept Orthoped Surg, Murayama Med Ctr, 2-37-1 Gakuen, Tokyo 2080011, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Shinjyuku Ku, 35 Shinanomachi, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[3] Keio Spine Res Grp, Shinjyuku Ku, 35 Shinanomachi, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
关键词
Adult spinal deformity; ASD; Corrective spine surgery; Gait analysis; LIV; UIV; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; SAGITTAL PLANE ALIGNMENT; FLATBACK DEFORMITY; BALANCE; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; MECHANISMS; STRENGTH; OCCIPUT; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.026
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The relationship between gait pattern and the level of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) in surgically treated patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) has not been fully documented. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the effect of UIV level for the gait pattern in ASD. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A prospective case series was carried out. PATIENT SAMPLE: Thirty surgically treated consecutive female ASD with lumbosacral fusion (age 67.0 +/- 8.4 years; body mass index 22.7 +/- 2.4 kg/m(2); Cobb angle 49.9 degrees +/- 21.3 degrees; coronal vertical axis 1.5 +/- 3.6 cm; C7 sagittal vertical axis [C7SVA] 9.3 +/- 5.3 cm; pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis 35.4 degrees +/- 25.8 degrees; and lean volume of the lower leg 5.5 +/- 0.9 kg) were categorized into upper thoracic [UT] group or lower thoracic [LT] group based on the level of UIV (UT; UIV T2-T5, LT; UIV T9-T11), and the gait pattern were compared before and after corrective spine surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and force plate analysis were the outcome measures. METHODS: All subjects underwent gait analysis on a custom-built force plate. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Subjects were followed-up for at least 2 years postoperation. RESULTS: The UT group had larger baseline Cobb angle, whereas the LT group had larger C7SVA (UT vs. LT; Cobb angle: 59.2 +/- 22.9 vs. 44.6 +/- 17.4 degrees, p=.03, C7SVA: 10.9 +/- 8.7 vs. 12.0 +/- 7.1 cm, p=.03). Preoperatively, no difference was found in gait velocity and stride between UT and LT group, whereas the right and left difference of step length was significantly large in UT group (velocity: 55.0 +/- 12.5 vs. 53.6 +/- 9.0 m/min, stride: 99.7 +/- 13.0 vs. 97.8 +/- 13.6 cm, step length; 10.4 +/- 4.9 vs. 5.6%+/- 3.3%). Coronal and sagittal alignments were significantly improved in both groups (total; Cobb angle: 19.4 degrees +/- 10.6 degrees, C7SVA: 5.3 +/- 2.9 cm, PI-LL: 12.1 degrees +/- 5.1 degrees). Gait pattern, stride, and velocity all improved significantly after surgery (total; velocity: 62.3 +/- 8.9m/min, stride: 106.8 +/- 12.3 cm, p=. 01). The knee angle at the heel contact phase and hip range of motion (ROM) were also significantly improved at postoperation (total; hip ROM: preoperation: 29.2 degrees +/- 9.1 degrees, postoperation: 36.2 degrees +/- 4.8 degrees, knee angle; preoperation: 10.6 degrees +/- 6.6 degrees, postoperation: 4.4 degrees +/- 2.8 degrees). No difference was observed for the pelvis and shoulder rotation on the horizontal plane at postoperation in both groups (total; pelvis rotation; preoperation: 7.4 degrees +/- 3.4 degrees, postoperation: 7.9 degrees +/- 2.4 degrees, shoulder rotation; preoperation: 7.4 degrees +/- 2.9 degrees, postoperation: 8.7 degrees +/- 3.6 degrees). The head vertical deviation was also not changed postoperatively in both groups (preoperation: 3.1 +/- 0.9 cm, postoperation: 3.1 +/- 0.8 cm). CONCLUSIONS: Both UT and LT groups achieved similar improvement of gait ability and pattern after surgery. Additional studies will be needed to further define the effect of UIV for the activity of daily living such as fast walking, stepping the stairs, or standing from the chair in ASDs. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 138
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] Comparing the Upper Instrumented Vertebrae Tilt Angle vs Screw Angle in the Development of Proximal Junction Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Which Matters More?
    Peterson, Keyan
    Chanbour, Hani
    Longo, Michael
    Chen, Jeffrey W.
    Jonzzon, Soren
    Roth, Steven G.
    Pennings, Jacquelyn S.
    Abtahi, Amir M.
    Stephens, Byron F.
    Zuckerman, Scott L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 18 (03) : 312 - 321
  • [22] The Relationship between the Hounsfield Units Value of the Upper Instrumented Vertebra and the Severity of Proximal Junctional Fracture after Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Yoshie, Norichika
    Maruo, Keishi
    Arizumi, Fumihiro
    Kishima, Kazuya
    Kusukawa, Tomoyuki
    Tachibana, Toshiya
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (06):
  • [23] Predictive model for major complications 2years after corrective spine surgery for adult spinal deformity
    Yagi, Mitsuru
    Hosogane, Naobumi
    Fujita, Nobuyuki
    Okada, Eijiro
    Tsuji, Osahiko
    Nagoshi, Narihito
    Asazuma, Takashi
    Tsuji, Takashi
    Nakamura, Masaya
    Matsumoto, Morio
    Watanabe, Kota
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 28 (01) : 180 - 187
  • [24] The association between lower Hounsfield units of the upper instrumented vertebra and proximal junctional failure after limited lumbar fusion for adult spinal deformity
    Hiroshi Moridaira
    Satoshi Inami
    Masahiko Takahata
    Daisaku Takeuchi
    Haruki Ueda
    Takuya Iimura
    Tomoya Kanto
    Satoshi Takada
    Kazuo Doi
    Hiroshi Taneichi
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 26 (1)
  • [25] Bicortical Screw Purchase at Upper Instrumented Vertebra (UIV) Can Cause UIV Fracture After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Finite Element Analysis Study
    Wui, Seong-Hyun
    Hyun, Seung-Jae
    Kang, Bokku
    Kim, Ki-Jeong
    Jahng, Tae-Ahn
    Kim, Hyun Jib
    NEUROSPINE, 2020, 17 (02) : 377 - 383
  • [26] Clinical Outcomes of Corrective Fusion Surgery From the Thoracic Spine to the Pelvis for Adult Spinal Deformity at 1, 2, and 5 years Postoperatively
    Arima, Hideyuki
    Hasegawa, Tomohiko
    Yamato, Yu
    Yoshida, Go
    Banno, Tomohiro
    Oe, Shin
    Mihara, Yuki
    Ide, Koichiro
    Watanabe, Yuh
    Nakai, Keiichi
    Kurosu, Kenta
    Matsuyama, Yukihiro
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (11) : 792 - 799
  • [27] Prevention of Acute Proximal Junctional Fractures After Long Thoracolumbar Posterior Fusions for Adult Spinal Deformity Using 2-level Cement Augmentation at the Upper Instrumented Vertebra and the Vertebra 1 Level Proximal to the Upper Instrumented Vertebra
    Theologis, Alexander A.
    Burch, Shane
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (19) : 1516 - 1526
  • [28] Preoperative Radiographic Evaluation of Thoracic Flexibility and Compensation for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. How to Select Optimal Upper Instrumented Vertebra to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis
    Ohba, Tetsuro
    Koji, Fujita
    Koyama, Kensuke
    Oba, Hiroki
    Oda, Kotaro
    Tanaka, Nobuki
    Haro, Hirotaka
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (02) : 144 - 152
  • [29] The Impact of Lumbopelvic Realignment Versus Prevention Strategies at the Upper-instrumented Vertebra on the Rates of Junctional Failure Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Passias, Peter G.
    Williamson, Tyler K.
    Joujon-Roche, Rachel
    Krol, Oscar
    Tretiakov, Peter
    Imbo, Bailey
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Owusu-Sarpong, Stephane
    Lebovic, Jordan
    Mir, Jamshaid
    Dave, Pooja
    McFarland, Kimberly
    Vira, Shaleen
    Diebo, Bassel G.
    Park, Paul
    Chou, Dean
    Smith, Justin S.
    Lafage, Renaud
    Lafage, Virginie
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (06) : E72 - E78
  • [30] Effect of Different Types of Upper Instrumented Vertebrae Instruments on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Pedicle Screw versus Transverse Process Hook
    Matsumura, Akira
    Namikawa, Takashi
    Kato, Minori
    Oyama, Shoichiro
    Hori, Yusuke
    Yabu, Akito
    Hidaka, Noriaki
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (04) : 622 - 631