One-Day Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Digital Pathology by Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy

被引:4
|
作者
Falagario, Ugo Giovanni [1 ]
Selvaggio, Oscar [1 ]
Sanguedolce, Francesca [2 ]
Milillo, Paola [3 ]
Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara [4 ]
Bruno, Salvatore Mariano [1 ]
Recchia, Marco [1 ]
Bettocchi, Carlo [1 ]
Busetto, Gian Maria [1 ]
Macarini, Luca [3 ]
Rocco, Bernardo [4 ]
Cormio, Luigi [1 ,5 ]
Carrieri, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Foggia, Dept Urol & Organ Transplantat, I-71122 Foggia, Italy
[2] Univ Foggia, Dept Pathol, I-71122 Foggia, Italy
[3] Univ Foggia, Dept Radiol, I-71122 Foggia, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Urol, ASST Santi Paolo & Carlo, Dipartimento Sci Salute, I-20142 Milan, Italy
[5] Bonomo Teaching Hosp, Dept Urol, I-76123 Andria, Italy
关键词
biparametric magnetic resonance imaging; digital pathology; fluorescence confocal microscopy; prostate cancer; RISK; MEN; MRI; PSA;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics12020277
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In this prospective observational study, we tested the feasibility and efficacy of a novel one-day PCa diagnosis path based on biparametric magnetic resonance (bpMRI) and digital pathology by fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM). Patients aged 55-70 years scheduled for PBx due to increased PSA levels (3-10 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digitorectal examination were enrolled. All patients underwent bpMRI and PBx with immediate FCM evaluation of biopsy cores. Patients were asked to fill out a dedicated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Patients' satisfaction rates and concordance between digital pathology and standard HE evaluation were the outcomes of interest. Twelve patients completed our one-day PCa diagnosis path. BpMRI showed suspicious lesions in 7 patients. Digital pathology by FCM identified PCa in 5 (41.7%) of the 12 patients. Standard pathology confirmed the diagnosis made through digital pathology in all the cases. At a per patient level, high concordance between the methods was achieved in Gleason Grading (4 out of 5 patients). The level of agreement in the number of positive cores was lower but did not affect the choice of treatment in any of the 5 PCa cases. At a per core level, the agreement was very high for the diagnosis of anyPCa (96.2%) and csPCa (97.3%), with a k coefficient of 0.90 and 0.92, respectively (near perfect agreement). In conclusion, one-day PCa diagnosis by FCM represents a feasible, reliable, and fast diagnostic method that provides significant advantages in optimizing time and resources, leading to patients having a higher quality standard of care perception.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer using biparametric magnetic resonance imaging: An evolving concept
    Mahajan, Manik
    Gupta, Vikrant
    Gupta, Puneet
    Sharma, Poonam
    Abrol, Deepak
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (06) : 1640 - 1645
  • [22] Accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer by combining Proclarix with magnetic resonance imaging
    Morote, Juan
    Pye, Hayley
    Campistol, Miriam
    Celma, Anna
    Regis, Lucas
    Semidey, Maria
    de Torres, Ines
    Mast, Richard
    Planas, Jacques
    Santamaria, Anna
    Trilla, Enrique
    Athanasiou, Alcibiade
    Singh, Saurabh
    Heavey, Susan
    Stopka-Farooqui, Urszula
    Freeman, Alex
    Haider, Aiman
    Schiess, Ralph
    Whitaker, Hayley C.
    Punwani, Shonit
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Emberton, Mark
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 132 (02) : 188 - 195
  • [23] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Haider, M. A.
    Yao, X.
    Loblaw, A.
    Finelli, A.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (09) : 550 - 567
  • [24] Utility of Combining Prostate Health Index and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Sekine, Yoshitaka
    Fujizuka, Yuji
    Nakazawa, Shun
    Tsuji, Yusuke
    Ohtsu, Akira
    Miyazawa, Yoshiyuki
    Arai, Seiji
    Nomura, Masashi
    Koike, Hidekazu
    Matsui, Hiroshi
    Shibuya, Kei
    Ito, Kazuto
    Ikota, Hayato
    Suzuki, Kazuhiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2025,
  • [25] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: an Updated Systematic Review
    Haider, M. A.
    Brown, J.
    Yao, X.
    Chin, J.
    Perlis, N.
    Schieda, N.
    Loblaw, A.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 33 (12) : E599 - E612
  • [26] A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive patients
    Hu, Beibei
    Zhang, Huili
    Zhang, Yueyue
    Jin, Yongming
    CANCER IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [27] The Importance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
    Hamidi, Nurullah
    Suer, Evren
    Ozden, Eriz
    Akinci, Aykut
    Gokce, Mehmet Ilker
    Telli, Onur
    Gulpinar, Omer
    Gogus, Cagatay
    Turkolmez, Kadir
    Baltaci, Sumer
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2016, 15 (01): : 4 - 7
  • [28] Prebiopsy magnetic resonance spectroscopy and imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Kumar, Virendra
    Jagannathan, Naranamangalam R.
    Thulkar, Sanjay
    Kumar, Rajeev
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 (07) : 602 - 613
  • [29] Clinical Utility of Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
    Levy, Micah
    Ratnani, Parita
    Moody, Kate
    Garcia, Mariely
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Parekh, Sneha
    Pandav, Krunal
    Shukla, Bhavya
    Prasad, Sonya
    Sobotka, Stanislaw
    Haines, Kenneth, III
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Wiklund, Peter
    Tewari, Ash
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 28 : 9 - 16
  • [30] Diagnosis of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging in men treated with 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors
    Falagario, Ugo G.
    Lantz, Anna
    Jambor, Ivan
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    Bettocchi, Carlo
    Finati, Marco
    Ricapito, Anna
    Luzzago, Stefano
    Ferro, Matteo
    Musi, Gennaro
    Totaro, Angelo
    Racioppi, Marco
    Carbonara, Umberto
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Manfredi, Matteo
    D'Aietti, Damiano
    Porcaro, Antonio Benito
    Nordstrom, Tobias
    Bjornebo, Lars
    Oderda, Marco
    Soria, Francesco
    Taimen, Pekka
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Perez, Ileana Montoya
    Ettala, Otto
    Marchioni, Michele
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Ferriero, Mariaconsiglia
    Brassetti, Aldo
    Napolitano, Luigi
    Carmignani, Luca
    Signorini, Claudia
    Conti, Andrea
    Ludovico, Giuseppe
    Scarcia, Marcello
    Trombetta, Carlo
    Claps, Francesco
    Traunero, Fabio
    Montanari, Emanuele
    Boeri, Luca
    Maggi, Martina
    Del Giudice, Francesco
    Bove, Pierluigi
    Forte, Valerio
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Rossanese, Marta
    Mucciardi, Giuseppe
    Pagliarulo, Vincenzo
    Tafuri, Alessandro
    Mirone, Vincenzo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (11) : 2967 - 2974