One-Day Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Digital Pathology by Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy

被引:4
|
作者
Falagario, Ugo Giovanni [1 ]
Selvaggio, Oscar [1 ]
Sanguedolce, Francesca [2 ]
Milillo, Paola [3 ]
Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara [4 ]
Bruno, Salvatore Mariano [1 ]
Recchia, Marco [1 ]
Bettocchi, Carlo [1 ]
Busetto, Gian Maria [1 ]
Macarini, Luca [3 ]
Rocco, Bernardo [4 ]
Cormio, Luigi [1 ,5 ]
Carrieri, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Foggia, Dept Urol & Organ Transplantat, I-71122 Foggia, Italy
[2] Univ Foggia, Dept Pathol, I-71122 Foggia, Italy
[3] Univ Foggia, Dept Radiol, I-71122 Foggia, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Urol, ASST Santi Paolo & Carlo, Dipartimento Sci Salute, I-20142 Milan, Italy
[5] Bonomo Teaching Hosp, Dept Urol, I-76123 Andria, Italy
关键词
biparametric magnetic resonance imaging; digital pathology; fluorescence confocal microscopy; prostate cancer; RISK; MEN; MRI; PSA;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics12020277
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In this prospective observational study, we tested the feasibility and efficacy of a novel one-day PCa diagnosis path based on biparametric magnetic resonance (bpMRI) and digital pathology by fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM). Patients aged 55-70 years scheduled for PBx due to increased PSA levels (3-10 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digitorectal examination were enrolled. All patients underwent bpMRI and PBx with immediate FCM evaluation of biopsy cores. Patients were asked to fill out a dedicated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Patients' satisfaction rates and concordance between digital pathology and standard HE evaluation were the outcomes of interest. Twelve patients completed our one-day PCa diagnosis path. BpMRI showed suspicious lesions in 7 patients. Digital pathology by FCM identified PCa in 5 (41.7%) of the 12 patients. Standard pathology confirmed the diagnosis made through digital pathology in all the cases. At a per patient level, high concordance between the methods was achieved in Gleason Grading (4 out of 5 patients). The level of agreement in the number of positive cores was lower but did not affect the choice of treatment in any of the 5 PCa cases. At a per core level, the agreement was very high for the diagnosis of anyPCa (96.2%) and csPCa (97.3%), with a k coefficient of 0.90 and 0.92, respectively (near perfect agreement). In conclusion, one-day PCa diagnosis by FCM represents a feasible, reliable, and fast diagnostic method that provides significant advantages in optimizing time and resources, leading to patients having a higher quality standard of care perception.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is It PRIME Time for Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis?
    Ng, Alexander
    Khetrapal, Pramit
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 82 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [2] Opportunistic Prostate Cancer Screening with Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (VISIONING)
    Wetterauer, Christian
    Matthias, Marc
    Pueschel, Heike
    Deckart, Alexander
    Bubendorf, Lukas
    Mortezavi, Ashkan
    Arbelaez, Emilio
    Winkel, David Jean
    Heye, Tobias
    Boll, Daniel T.
    Merkle, Elmar
    Hayoz, Stefanie
    Seifert, Helge H.
    Rentsch, Cyrill A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2024, 10 (02): : 332 - 338
  • [3] Prebiopsy IMPROD Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-Specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: An External Validation Study
    Knaapila, Juha
    Jambor, Ivan
    Perez, Ileana Montoya
    Ettala, Otto
    Taimen, Pekka
    Verho, Janne
    Kiviniemi, Aida
    Pahikkala, Tapio
    Merisaari, Harri
    Lamminen, Tarja
    Saunavaara, Jani
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Syvanen, Kari T.
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (05): : 648 - 656
  • [4] Discrepancy in the Location of Prostate Cancer Indicated on Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathologically Diagnosed Using Surgical Specimens
    Tomioka, Masayuki
    Nakane, Keita
    Kawase, Makoto
    Iinuma, Koji
    Kato, Daiki
    Kawase, Kota
    Taniguchi, Tomoki
    Tobisawa, Yuki
    Sugino, Fumiya
    Kaga, Tetsuro
    Kato, Hiroki
    Matsuo, Masayuki
    Kito, Yusuke
    Saigo, Chiemi
    Suzui, Natsuko
    Ito, Takayasu
    Miyazaki, Tatsuhiko
    Takeuchi, Tamotsu
    Koie, Takuya
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (05) : 2846 - 2855
  • [5] The utility of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis in the Australian setting
    Tay, Jia Ying Isaac
    Chow, Ken
    Gavin, Dominic J.
    Mertens, Evie
    Howard, Nicholas
    Thomas, Benjamin
    Dundee, Philip
    Peters, Justin
    Simkin, Paul
    Kranz, Sevastjan
    Finlay, Moira
    Heinze, Stefan
    Kelly, Brian
    Costello, Anthony
    Corcoran, Niall
    BJUI COMPASS, 2021, 2 (06): : 377 - 384
  • [6] Biparametric versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: detection of clinically significant cancer in a perfect match group
    Cho, Jungheum
    Ahn, Hyungwoo
    Hwang, Sung Il
    Lee, Hak Jong
    Choe, Gheeyoung
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 8 (04) : 146 - 151
  • [7] The effect of capped biparametric magnetic resonance imaging slots on weekly prostate cancer imaging workload
    Sushentsev, Nikita
    Caglic, Iztok
    Sala, Evis
    Shaida, Nadeem
    Slough, Rhys A.
    Carmo, Bruno
    Kozlov, Vasily
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent J.
    Barrett, Tristan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1108)
  • [8] CURRENT ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE SCREENING, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Nikles, Sven
    Pezelj, Ivan
    Tomic, Miroslav
    Knezevic, Matej
    Vrhovec, Borna
    Dumbovic, Leo
    Pirsa, Matea
    Kavelj, Ivana
    Tomaskovic, Igor
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2022, 61 : 92 - 94
  • [9] Editorial: Magnetic resonance imaging applications for the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Preisser, Felix
    Marchioni, Michele
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [10] Impact of biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the diagnostics of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naive men
    Knaapila, Juha
    Autio, Venla
    Jambor, Ivan
    Ettala, Otto
    Verho, Janne
    Kiyiniemi, Aida
    Taimen, Pekka
    Perez, Ileana Montoya
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Syvanen, Kari T.
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 54 (01) : 7 - 13