Sensitivity analysis of agent-based models: a new protocol

被引:31
作者
Borgonovo, Emanuele [1 ,2 ]
Pangallo, Marco [3 ,4 ]
Rivkin, Jan [5 ]
Rizzo, Leonardo [6 ]
Siggelkow, Nicolaj [7 ]
机构
[1] Bocconi Univ, Dept Decis Sci, Via Roentgen 1, I-20136 Pisa, Italy
[2] Bocconi Univ, BIDSA, Via Roentgen 1, I-20136 Pisa, Italy
[3] St Anna Sch Adv Studies, Inst Econ, I-56127 Milan, Italy
[4] St Anna Sch Adv Studies, Dept EMbeDS, I-56127 Milan, Italy
[5] Harvard Sch Business, 237 Morgan Hall, Boston, MA 02163 USA
[6] Cent European Univ, Dept Network & Data Sci, Quellenstr 51, A-1100 Vienna, Austria
[7] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Management Dept, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Agent based modeling; Sensitivity analysis; Design of experiments; Total order sensitivity indices; GARBAGE; DIFFUSION; MARKET; PREDICTION; DESIGN; TRANSMISSION; DECISIONS; KNOWLEDGE; DYNAMICS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10588-021-09358-5
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Agent-based models (ABMs) are increasingly used in the management sciences. Though useful, ABMs are often critiqued: it is hard to discern why they produce the results they do and whether other assumptions would yield similar results. To help researchers address such critiques, we propose a systematic approach to conducting sensitivity analyses of ABMs. Our approach deals with a feature that can complicate sensitivity analyses: most ABMs include important non-parametric elements, while most sensitivity analysis methods are designed for parametric elements only. The approach moves from charting out the elements of an ABM through identifying the goal of the sensitivity analysis to specifying a method for the analysis. We focus on four common goals of sensitivity analysis: determining whether results are robust, which elements have the greatest impact on outcomes, how elements interact to shape outcomes, and which direction outcomes move when elements change. For the first three goals, we suggest a combination of randomized finite change indices calculation through a factorial design. For direction of change, we propose a modification of individual conditional expectation (ICE) plots to account for the stochastic nature of the ABM response. We illustrate our approach using the Garbage Can Model, a classic ABM that examines how organizations make decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 94
页数:43
相关论文
共 94 条
[41]   Acquisitions, Node Collapse, and Network Revolution [J].
Hernandez, Exequiel ;
Menon, Anoop .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 64 (04) :1652-1671
[42]   Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models [J].
Homma, T ;
Saltelli, A .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1996, 52 (01) :1-17
[43]   Experiential Learning, Competitive Selection, and Downside Risk: A New Perspective on Managerial Risk Taking [J].
Jaspersen, Johannes G. ;
Peter, Richard .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2017, 28 (05) :915-930
[44]   On agent-based software engineering [J].
Jennings, NR .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, 117 (02) :277-296
[45]   Impacts of knowledge on online brand success: an agent-based model for online market share enhancement [J].
Jiang, Guoyin ;
Tadikamalla, Pandu R. ;
Shang, Jennifer ;
Zhao, Ling .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 248 (03) :1093-1103
[46]   Crowd Wisdom Relies on Agents' Ability in Small Groups with a Voting Aggregation Rule [J].
Keuschnigg, Marc ;
Ganser, Christian .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 63 (03) :818-828
[47]   Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments [J].
Kleijnen, Jack P. C. .
STATISTICS AND SIMULATION, IWS 8 2015, 2018, 231 :3-22
[48]   Estimation of global sensitivity indices for models with dependent variables [J].
Kucherenko, S. ;
Tarantola, S. ;
Annoni, P. .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 183 (04) :937-946
[49]   Role of 'vision' in neighbourhood racial segregation: A variant of the Schelling segregation model [J].
Laurie, AJ ;
Jaggi, NK .
URBAN STUDIES, 2003, 40 (13) :2687-2704
[50]   The First Approximation Algorithm for the Maximin Latin Hypercube Design Problem [J].
Le Guiban, Kaourintin ;
Rimmel, Arpad ;
Weisser, Marc-Antoine ;
Tomasik, Joanna .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2018, 66 (01) :253-266