Luteal phase support may improve pregnancy outcomes during intrauterine insemination cycles

被引:28
|
作者
Maher, Mohamed Ahmed [1 ]
机构
[1] Menoufia Univ, Fac Med, Shibin Al Kawm, Egypt
关键词
Intrauterine insemination; Luteal phase support; Ovulation induction; Unexplained infertility; Vaginal progesterone; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN; LUTEINIZING-HORMONE; INVITRO FERTILIZATION; OVARIAN STIMULATION; UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY; VAGINAL PROGESTERONE; OVULATION INDUCTION; RATES; ANTAGONIST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.022
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine the impact of luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone on pregnancy outcomes in infertile couples undergoing intrauterine insemination when recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone was used for ovulation induction. Study design: This prospective randomized study was undertaken at the Infertility Unit, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and included 71 patients with either primary or secondary infertility who met the inclusion criteria. All 71 patients underwent intrauterine insemination. Thirty-seven were randomized to start with a supported cycle and 34 started with an unsupported cycle. In supported cycles, patients received vaginal progesterone once daily from the day after insemination for 14 days. No progesterone was given during unsupported cycles. For the second cycle, crossover occurred such that women who initially had a supported cycle underwent an unsupported cycle, and vice versa. The cycle types were alternated until the end of the study. The main outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rates and live-birth rates per cycle and per patient. Results: In total, 132 supported cycles and 126 unsupported cycles were performed successfully. The clinical pregnancy rate per patient was higher for supported than unsupported cycles (54.92% vs. 35.21%, respectively; p = 0.016), but the per-cycle difference was not significant (29.54% vs. 19.84%, respectively; p = 0.07). Twenty-five pregnancies in supported cycles and seven pregnancies in unsupported cycles resulted in live births. When these rates were compared per cycle and per patient, significant differences were detected between the cycle types (18.9% and 35.2% vs. 5.5% and 9.8%; p = 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone improved the success of intrauterine insemination cycles when recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone was used for ovulation induction. Condensation: Luteal phase support may improve pregnancy outcomes during intrauterine insemination cycles, but large multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials are needed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 62
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Luteal phase support for women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination or sexual intercourse
    Salang, L.
    Teixeira, D. M.
    Sola, I.
    Sothornwit, J.
    Martins, W. P.
    Rodriguez, M. B.
    Lumbiganon, P. L.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39
  • [22] Luteal phase support for women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination or sexual intercourse
    Salang, Lingling
    Teixeira, Danielle M.
    Sola, Ivan
    Sothornwit, Jen
    Martins, Wellington P.
    Rodriguez, Magdalena Bofill
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (08):
  • [23] Does luteal phase support by human chorionic gonadotropin improve pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles?
    Eftekhar, Maryam
    Dashti, Saeideh
    Omidi, Marjan
    Tabatabaei, Afsar Alsadat
    MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2018, 23 (04) : 300 - 302
  • [24] EFFECT OF AGE ON PREGNANCY RATES PER CYCLE OF INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION FOR MALE FACTOR IN NATURAL CYCLES SUPPORTED BY LUTEAL PHASE SUPPLEMENTATION
    Check, Jerome
    Wilson, Carrie
    Bollendorf, Aniela
    JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2012, 33 (02): : 75 - 75
  • [25] Subcutaneous aqueous versus vaginal progesterone gel for luteal phase support in intrauterine insemination cycles: a pilot randomized, controlled trial
    Venturella, R.
    Mocciaro, R.
    Lico, D.
    Rocca, M.
    Di Cello, A.
    Piccione, F.
    D'Alessandro, P.
    Morelli, M.
    Zullo, F.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 304 - 305
  • [26] RCT to evaluate the necessity of routine luteal phase support after ovarian stimulation by oral ovulogens in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles
    Sharma, R.
    Gupta, P.
    Upadhyaya, P.
    Rahman, F.
    Gupta, A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38
  • [27] ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ADVANCING PATERNAL AGE AND PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION CYCLES
    Sarkar, Papri
    Romanello, Jennifer P.
    Jahandideh, Samad
    Wang, Jiarui
    Hoyos, Luis R.
    Uhler, Meike L.
    Homer, Michael Vance
    Harris, Benjamin S.
    Devine, Kathleen
    Romanski, Phillip A.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 120 (04) : E254 - E255
  • [28] Comparison of oral dydrogesterone and vaginal micronized progesterone for luteal phase support in intrauterine insemination
    Tas, Mustafa
    Uludag, Semih Zeki
    Aygen, Mustafa Ercan
    Sahin, Yilmaz
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 36 (01) : 77 - 80
  • [29] The Use of Tenaculum During Intrauterine Insemination May Not Affect the Pregnancy Outcome
    Park, Kyung Eui
    Ku, Seung-Yup
    Kim, Hoon
    Jee, Byung Chul
    Suh, Chang Suk
    Kim, Seok Hyun
    Choi, Young Min
    Kim, Jung Gu
    Moon, Shin Yong
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 51 (06) : 949 - 953
  • [30] How to easily improve of more than 40 % the pregnancy rate in intrauterine insemination cycles?
    Patrat, C.
    Fauque, P.
    Pocate, K.
    Juillard, J. C.
    Gayet, V.
    Blanchet, V.
    de Ziegler, D.
    Wolf, J. P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 : I259 - I259