Research on partner selection decision-making of the strategic alliance of R&D projects

被引:0
|
作者
Chen Wei [1 ]
Zhang Haoyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Engn Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION & MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II | 2007年
关键词
AHP; partner selection; fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; R&D project; rough set theory; strategic alliance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the 21st century enterprises are facing a quickly changed and intensely competitive market. In order to realize the target of China's enterprises independent innovation strategy, enterprises' behaviors are the key factor. However, the research and development brings higher and higher risks to every enterprise. Therefore, setting up R&D strategic alliance is a generally way adopted by many enterprises to adapt to the new competition. The selection of alliance partners is crucial to the success of a strategic alliance. Considering the characteristics of the strategic alliance of R&D projects and market condition, this paper try to combine qualitative analysis with quantitative analysis, and set up the evaluation system of the partner selection of the strategic alliance of R&D project. We apply the rough set theory to realize the knowledge reduction, use the method of analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight of each index, make comprehensive evaluation to all of potential alliance partner by the method of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Eventually, we can obtain the optimal decision of partner selection.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 31
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Logistics Alliance Partner Selection Research Based on Triangular Fuzzy Analysis
    Luo, Wei
    Fu, Zhuo
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 660 - 664
  • [42] Modelling and group decision-making method for virtual enterprise partner selection with fuzzy completion time and due date
    Huang B.
    Xiao Y.
    Chen Y.
    International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 2022, 36 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [43] The effects of knowledge network characteristics on R&D alliance formation
    Kang, Inje
    Seo, Eun-Yeong
    Lee, Duk Hee
    TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [44] Research Review of Selecting Cooperative R&D Partners
    Jiang, Lingmin
    Cheng, Yifang
    Zhong, Ruiqiong
    2014 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION INNOVATION (EBMEI 2014), VOL 33, 2014, 33 : 3 - 7
  • [45] Landfill site selection by decision-making tools based on fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method
    Nazari, Abdolhadi
    Salarirad, Mohammad Mehdi
    Bazzazi, Abbas Aghajani
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2012, 65 (06) : 1631 - 1642
  • [46] Deriving and Assessing Strategic Priorities for Outsourcing Partner Selection in Pharmaceutical R&D: an Approach Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Based on 34 Experts' Responses From Korean Pharmaceutical Industry
    Song, Chie Hoon
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL INNOVATION, 2019, 14 (01) : 66 - 75
  • [47] Deriving and Assessing Strategic Priorities for Outsourcing Partner Selection in Pharmaceutical R&D: an Approach Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Based on 34 Experts’ Responses From Korean Pharmaceutical Industry
    Chie Hoon Song
    Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 2019, 14 : 66 - 75
  • [48] APPLICATION OF DECISION-MAKING ALGORITHMS IN THE LANDFILL SITE SELECTION
    Barnabas, Godwin S.
    Geethan, Arun Vasantha
    Ganesh, Valai S.
    Karthikeyan, M. K. V.
    Das, Chrispin M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 22 (09): : 1547 - 1556
  • [49] Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection
    Kahraman, C
    Ruan, D
    Dogan, I
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2003, 157 (1-4) : 135 - 153
  • [50] The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia
    Hitt, MA
    Ahlstrom, D
    Dacin, AT
    Levitas, E
    Svobodina, L
    ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (02) : 173 - 185