Chemosensitivity and outcome of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated ovarian cancer patients after first-line chemotherapy compared with sporadic ovarian cancer patients

被引:159
|
作者
Vencken, P. M. L. H. [2 ]
Kriege, M. [1 ]
Hoogwerf, D. [1 ]
Beugelink, S. [1 ]
van der Burg, M. E. L.
Hooning, M. J. [1 ]
Berns, E. M.
Jager, A. [1 ]
Collee, M. [3 ]
Burger, C. W. [2 ]
Seynaeve, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol,Family Canc Clin, NL-3075 EA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Div Gynaecol Oncol, NL-3075 EA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Family Canc Clin, Dept Clin Genet, NL-3075 EA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
BRCA; chemotherapy; ovarian cancer; response; survival; IMPROVED SURVIVAL; SOLID TUMORS; MUTATIONS; BREAST; PENETRANCE; FEATURES; RISKS; WOMEN; OOPHORECTOMY; RECIST;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdq628
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Because it is insufficiently clear whether BRCA-associated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is more chemosensitive than sporadic EOC, we examined response to chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated versus sporadic EOC patients. Methods: Data about patient characteristics, response to and outcome after primary therapy, including chemotherapy, were collected from 99 BRCA1, 13 BRCA2 and 222 sporadic patients. Analyses were carried out using a chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. Results: Complete response (CR) or no evidence of disease (NED) was observed in 87% of the BRCA1 patients, progressive disease (PD) in 2%, being 71% and 15%, respectively, in sporadic EOC patients (P = 0.002). In BRCA2 patients, 92% had CR/NED, and none PD (P = 0.27). Median PFS in BRCA1, BRCA2 and sporadic patients was 2.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-2.5] years (P = 0.006), 5.6 (95% CI 0.0-11.5) years (P = 0.008) and 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.5) years, respectively. Median OS in the three groups was 5.9 (95% CI 4.7-7.0) years (P < 0.001), > 10 years (P = 0.008), and 2.9 (95% CI 2.2-3.5) years, respectively. A trend for a longer PFS and OS in BRCA2 compared with BRCA1 patients was observed. Conclusion: Compared with sporadic EOC patients, both BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated patients have improved outcomes after primary therapy, including chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1346 / 1352
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcome of BRCA1- compared with BRCA2-associated ovarian cancer: a nationwide study in the Netherlands
    Vencken, P. M. L. H.
    Reitsma, W.
    Kriege, M.
    Mourits, M. J. E.
    de Bock, G. H.
    de Hullu, J. A.
    van Altena, A. M.
    Gaarenstroom, K. N.
    Vasen, H. F. A.
    Adank, M. A.
    Schmidt, M. K.
    van Beurden, M.
    Zweemer, R. P.
    Rijcken, F.
    Slangen, B. F. M.
    Burger, C. W.
    Seynaeve, C.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 (08) : 2036 - 2042
  • [2] Improved survival for BRCA2-associated serous ovarian cancer compared with both BRCA-negative and BRCA1-associated serous ovarian cancer
    Hyman, David M.
    Zhou, Qin
    Iasonos, Alexia
    Grisham, Rachel N.
    Arnold, Angela G.
    Phillips, Mary F.
    Bhatia, Jasmine
    Levine, Douglas A.
    Aghajanian, Carol
    Offit, Kenneth
    Barakat, Richard R.
    Spriggs, David R.
    Kauff, Noah D.
    CANCER, 2012, 118 (15) : 3703 - 3709
  • [3] Toxicity of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast cancer
    Drooger, Jan C.
    Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette A. M.
    Smallenbroek, Nyree
    Epskamp, Cynthia
    Seynaeve, Caroline M.
    Jager, Agnes
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 156 (03) : 557 - 566
  • [4] Toxicity of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast cancer
    Jan C. Drooger
    Bernadette A. M. Heemskerk-Gerritsen
    Nyrée Smallenbroek
    Cynthia Epskamp
    Caroline M. Seynaeve
    Agnes Jager
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 156 : 557 - 566
  • [5] Pattern and chemosensitivity of ovarian cancer in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations
    Ragupathy, K.
    Ferguson, M.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 31 (02) : 178 - 179
  • [6] Clinical features and outcomes of germline mutation BRCA1-linked versus sporadic ovarian cancer patients
    Synowiec, Agnieszka
    Wcislo, Gabriel
    Bodnar, Lubomir
    Gorski, Bohdan
    Szenajch, Jolanta
    Szarlej-Wcislo, Katarzyna
    Szczylik, Cezary
    HEREDITARY CANCER IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 14
  • [7] Outcome of ovarian cancer after breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
    Zaaijer, Leendert H.
    van Doorn, Helena C.
    Mourits, Marian J. E.
    van Beurden, Marc
    de Hullu, Joanne A.
    Adank, Muriel A.
    van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R. C. W.
    Vasen, Hans F. A.
    Slangen, Brigitte F. M.
    Gaarenstroom, Katja N.
    Zweemer, Ronald P.
    Vencken, Peggy M. L. H.
    Seynaeve, Caroline
    Kriege, Mieke
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 115 (10) : 1174 - 1178
  • [8] Comparison of effectiveness of treatment of patients with sporadic and germline BRCA1-related ovarian cancer
    Szatkowski, Wiktor
    Muzykiewicz, Konrad
    Jasiowka, Marek
    Karolewski, Kazimierz
    Kojs, Zbigiew
    Klimek, Malgorzata
    Blecharz, Pawel
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2016, 87 (06) : 422 - 425
  • [9] Improved survival in non-Ashkenazi Jewish ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations
    Lacour, Robin A.
    Westin, Shannon N.
    Meyer, Larissa A.
    Wingo, Shana N.
    Schorge, John O.
    Brooks, Rebecca
    Mutch, David
    Molina, Ashley
    Sutphen, Rebecca
    Barnes, Mack
    Elder, Jeffrey
    Teoh, Deanna
    Powell, C. Bethan
    Choubey, Veena
    Blank, Stephanie
    MacDonald, Heather R.
    Brady, Mark F.
    Urbauer, Diana L.
    Bodurka, Diane
    Gershenson, David M.
    Lu, Karen H.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (02) : 358 - 363
  • [10] Prognostic factors in Polish patients with BRCA1-dependent ovarian cancer
    Szatkowski, Wiktor
    Blecharz, Pawel
    Mitus, Jerzy W.
    Jasiowka, Marek
    Luczynska, Elzbieta
    Jakubowicz, Jerzy
    Byrski, Tomasz
    HEREDITARY CANCER IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 14