Rights, proportionality, and process in EU counterterrorism lawmaking

被引:2
|
作者
de Londras, Fiona [1 ,2 ]
Tregidge, Jasmin [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Global Legal Studies, Birmingham Law Sch, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Law, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] WestPoint Crime & Social Res, Truro, England
[4] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, Wales
来源
ICON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW | 2021年 / 19卷 / 02期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
DATA RETENTION; TERRORISM; KADI; PRIVACY; JUSTICE; COURT; ORDER; ECJ;
D O I
10.1093/icon/moab047
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Proportionality is a key principle of EU law. However, in spite of procedural requirements intended to ensure the full integration of proportionality as a design principle in EU law, the European Union continues to pass disproportionate counterterrorism laws. If proportionality is a fundamental constitutional principle of the European Union, and if lawmaking processes at EU level have been designed expressly with this in mind, then why do the EU's counterterrorism laws consistently raise issues of disproportionate interference with rights? Taking as a case study the passage of the EU Directive on Combating Terrorism, this article argues that at least part of the answer lies in the curtailment and adjustment, in the counterterrorism field, of lawmaking processes that are designed to be participatory, evidence-based, and informed by proportionality.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 693
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条