Wildlife and recreation management on private lands in the United States

被引:0
|
作者
Benson, DE [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Fishery & Wildlife Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
empowerment; enfranchisement; fee hunting; recreation; wildlife enterprises; wildlife ownership; wildlife values;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The public owns wildlife in North America, but landowners manage the habitat, influence reproductive potentials, and control the access to wildlife on private lands. Unfortunately landowners do not always view wildlife positively, owing to damages sustained, wildlife's competition with domestic production, and errant behaviors of users who access private lands. Recreational activities such as fee-hunting and wildlife viewing provide quality experiences for the recreationists and incentives for the landowners to keep wildlife. Private lands are found on 66% of the United States and contribute 80% of wildlife habitats, thus they are important to animal production, recreational use, and society. Expenditures for wildlife-based recreation totaled $101.2 billion in the United States (U.S.), with most money spent on equipment and trip-related costs (90%) for consumptive uses and 89% for nonconsumptive uses. Only $3.2 billion was spent for land leasing or ownership, yet hunting was practiced most on private lands (51%) or on public and private lands combined (30%). Nonconsumptive uses were fewer on private lands (10%) or on public and private lands combined (34%), yet those levels of use are significant enough to merit commensurate financial and management attention. Landowners need to participate in the management and in the profit-taking associated with the production of wildlife and the recreation it provides. Management and use of private lands should be increased by enfranchising private landowners to be partners with governments (which are entrusted as custodians over wildlife resources). Options for U. S. landowners to consider include: hunting, fishing, bed and breakfasts, ranch recreation, snow sports, wilderness experiences, wildlife viewing, nature study, and other nonconsumptive activities. Partnerships among landowners, governments, businesses, users, and communities are encouraged, whereby planning, programs, and evaluation can be integrated.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 371
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MANAGEMENT OF REGIONAL CLUSTERS: BASIC PRINCIPLES OF FORMATION OF TOURISM RECREATION CLUSTERS
    Libkovska, Una
    Ozola, Inta
    Kruzhalin, Viktor
    Kruzhalin, Kirill
    ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION, VOL III, 2015, : 377 - 384
  • [42] An exploratory study of concussion management policies in municipal park and recreation departments
    Kim, Sungwon
    Spengler, John O.
    Connaughton, Daniel P.
    JOURNAL OF POLICY RESEARCH IN TOURISM LEISURE AND EVENTS, 2016, 8 (03) : 274 - 288
  • [43] Expansion of golf courses in the United States
    Napton, Darrell E.
    Laingen, Christopher R.
    GEOGRAPHICAL REVIEW, 2008, 98 (01) : 24 - 41
  • [44] Congestion at recreation areas: Empirical evidence on perceptions, mitigating behaviour and management preferences
    Jakus, P
    Shaw, WD
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 50 (04) : 389 - 401
  • [45] Effects of Management of Domestic Dogs and Recreation on Carnivores in Protected Areas in Northern California
    Reed, Sarah E.
    Merenlender, Adina M.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2011, 25 (03) : 504 - 513
  • [46] Meeting the challenge of wild land recreation management: Demographic shifts and social inequality
    Taylor, DE
    JOURNAL OF LEISURE RESEARCH, 2000, 32 (01) : 171 - 179
  • [47] Municipality socioeconomic characteristics and the probability of occurrence of Wildlife Management Units in Mexico
    Sophie Avila-Foucat, Veronique
    Perez-Carnpuzano, Enrique
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 45 : 146 - 153
  • [48] Identifying Primary Drivers of Participants from Various Socioeconomic Backgrounds to Choose National Forest Lands in the Southeastern Region of the US as a Travel Destination for Recreation
    Jean, Rosny
    Naka, Kozma
    Christian, Colmore S.
    Gyawali, Buddhi Raj
    Bowman, Troy
    Hopkinson, Sampson
    LAND, 2022, 11 (08)
  • [49] Who's Your Partner? Who's Your Ally? Exploring the Characteristics of Public, Private, and Voluntary Recreation Linkages
    Cousens, Laura
    Barnes, Martha
    Stevens, Julie
    Mallen, Cheryl
    Bradish, Cheri
    JOURNAL OF PARK AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 24 (01) : 32 - 55
  • [50] Recreation carrying capacity estimations to support beach management at Praia de Faro, Portugal
    Zacarias, Daniel A.
    Williams, Allan T.
    Newton, Alice
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 31 (03) : 1075 - 1081