Working Memory Capacity in Generalized Social Phobia

被引:49
|
作者
Amir, Nader [1 ,2 ]
Bomyea, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Joint Doctoral Program Clin Psychol, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
social anxiety; working memory; executive control; anxiety; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; SELF-REGULATION; TRAIT ANXIETY; TERM-MEMORY; TASK; RESTRICTION; PERFORMANCE; ATTENTION; THREAT;
D O I
10.1037/a0022849
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Research suggests that understanding complex social cues depends on the availability of cognitive resources (e.g., Phillips, Channon, Tunstall, Hedenstrom, & Lyons, 2008). In spite of evidence suggesting that executive control functioning may impact anxiety (e.g., Eysenck, Derakshan, Santos, & Calvo. 2007), relatively few studies have examined working memory in individuals with generalized social phobia. Moreover, few studies have examined the role of threat-relevant content in working memory performance in clinically anxious populations. To this end, the present study assessed working memory capacity (WMC) in individuals with generalized social phobia and nonanxious controls using an operation span task with threat-relevant and neutral stimuli. Results revealed that nonanxious individuals demonstrated better WMC than individuals with generalized social phobia for neutral words but not for social threat words. Individuals with generalized social phobia demonstrated better WMC performance for threat words relative to neutral words. These results suggest that individuals with generalized social phobia may have relatively enhanced working memory performance for salient, socially relevant information. This enhanced working memory capacity for threat-relevant information may be the result of practice with this information in generalized social phobia.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 509
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The influence of personality and working memory capacity on implicit learning
    Munoz, Francisco Javier Guzman
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 71 (12): : 2603 - 2614
  • [22] Working memory load moderates late attentional bias in social anxiety
    Judah, Matt R.
    Grant, DeMond M.
    Lechner, William V.
    Mills, Adam C.
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2013, 27 (03) : 502 - 511
  • [23] Working Memory Capacity and Stroop Interference: Global Versus Local Indices of Executive Control
    Meier, Matt E.
    Kane, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2013, 39 (03) : 748 - 759
  • [24] Working through the pain: Working memory capacity and differences in processing and storage under pain
    Sanchez, Christopher A.
    MEMORY, 2011, 19 (02) : 226 - 232
  • [25] High Visual Working Memory Capacity in Trait Social Anxiety
    Moriya, Jun
    Sugiura, Yoshinori
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [26] Investigating Principal Working Memory Features in Generalized, Panic, and Social Anxiety Spectrum Disorders
    Abushalbaq, Oday M.
    Khdour, Hussain Y.
    Hamza, Eid G. Abo
    Moustafa, Ahmed A.
    Herzallah, Mohammad M.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 12
  • [27] The Relationships of Working Memory, Secondary Memory, and General Fluid Intelligence: Working Memory Is Special
    Shelton, Jill Talley
    Elliott, Emily M.
    Matthews, Russell A.
    Hill, B. D.
    Gouvier, Wm. Drew
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2010, 36 (03) : 813 - 820
  • [28] Working memory in social anxiety disorder: better manipulation of emotional versus neutral material in working memory
    Yoon, K. Lira
    Kutz, Amanda M.
    LeMoult, Joelle
    Joormann, Jutta
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2017, 31 (08) : 1733 - 1740
  • [29] Cognitive control in context: Working memory capacity and proactive control
    Redick, Thomas S.
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2014, 145 : 1 - 9
  • [30] Spatial Working Memory Capacity Predicts Bias in Estimates of Location
    Crawford, L. Elizabeth
    Landy, David
    Salthouse, Timothy A.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2016, 42 (09) : 1434 - 1447