A simulated severe difficult airway does not alter the intubation performance with the SensaScope: a prospective randomised manikin study

被引:6
作者
Ludwig, Andreea A. [2 ]
Baulig, Werner [1 ]
Biro, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Anaesthesiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Zurcher Hohenklin, Dept Internal Med, Davos, Switzerland
关键词
difficult airway; difficult intubation; difficult laryngoscopy; SensaScope equipment; video-assisted intubation; video stylet; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; LARYNGOSCOPE; MANAGEMENT; GLIDESCOPE(R); MCGRATH(R);
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283460fc9
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Design Prospective randomised controlled study. Setting Operation unit in a tertiary academic university hospital in a central European city. Period of the study was springtime and summer 2010. Patients or other participants Twenty-four anaesthesiologists with various levels of professional experience were allocated to intubate an airway manikin either with the SensaScope (group S) or with the conventional Macintosh 3 laryngoscope (group L). Interventions Each participant performed three consecutive intubations with normal anatomy followed by three intubations with difficult anatomy. The airway difficulty was simulated by inflation of the manikin's tongue base with 40 ml of air. The times taken to view the larynx and to insert the tracheal tube were noted. The resulting tube position and the occurrence of dental damage were recorded. Main outcome measures Those planned in the protocol. Results In normal anatomy, the laryngeal view (group L 5.9 +/- 4.2 s vs. group S 9.2 +/- 3.5 s) and intubation (group L 13.4 +/- 7.6 s vs. group S 23.3 +/- 8.6 s) was more rapidly obtained with conventional laryngoscopy (values presented as mean +/- SD). In difficult anatomy, only the SensaScope permitted successful laryngeal view (group L impossible vs. group S 9.9 +/- 4.8 s) and tracheal intubation (group L impossible vs. group S 23.4 +/- 8.8 s). The latter always enabled correct tracheal tube position, whereas with laryngoscopy alone either oesophageal intubation or aborted attempts resulted. In the difficult airway setting, the frequency of simulated tooth damage was also significantly higher with conventional laryngoscopy (group L 26 of 36 vs. group S 6 of 36). Conclusions The SensaScope performed fairly well in normal intubation anatomy, although its use was more complex than with conventional laryngoscopy and it required a slightly longer time. In the difficult airway setting, the SensaScope performed as well as in normal anatomy, whereas intubation by direct laryngoscopy proved to be impossible. The SensaScope enables the user to overcome severe airway difficulties caused by large tissue masses at the level of the tongue base or mouth floor. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28:449-453
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 453
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Awake intubation with C-MAC video-stylet versus fibreoptic bronchoscope in predicted difficult airway patients: Comparative randomised study
    Abd El-Aziz, Rehab Abd El-Raof
    Osman, Yasser Mohamed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 38 (01): : 650 - 655
  • [32] Video laryngoscope versus USB borescope-aided endotracheal intubation in adults with anticipated difficult airway: a prospective randomized controlled study
    Elshazly, Mohamed
    Medhat, Mark
    Marzouk, Sahar
    Samir, Enas M.
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 75 (04) : 331 - 337
  • [33] Does the use of a bougie reduce the force of laryngoscopy in a difficult airway with manual in-line stabilisation? A randomised crossover simulation study
    Hung, Rachel K. Y.
    Lewinsohn, Asher
    Jovaisa, Tomas
    Wijayatilake, Dhuleep S.
    Sherren, Peter B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 30 (09) : 563 - 566
  • [34] Comparison of Airtraq DL™ and Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube placement in simulated difficult airway: A randomised study
    Mounika, K.
    Kar, Prachi
    Padhy, Shibani
    Pathy, Archana
    Durga, Padmaja
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 66 (06) : 442 - 448
  • [35] SWIVIT - Swiss video-intubation trial evaluating video-laryngoscopes in a simulated difficult airway scenario: study protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in Switzerland
    Lorenz Theiler
    Kristina Hermann
    Patrick Schoettker
    Georges Savoldelli
    Natalie Urwyler
    Maren Kleine-Brueggeney
    Kristopher L Arheart
    Robert Greif
    Trials, 14
  • [36] Comparison between Air Q and intubating laryngeal mask airway as intubation conduits in patients with simulated fixed cervical spine: a prospective observational study
    Bala, Renu
    Basumatary, Jasmine
    Bansal, Priyanka
    MEDICAL GAS RESEARCH, 2023, 13 (01): : 10 - 14
  • [37] Gastric Tube Insertion Performance of Second-Generation Supraglottic Airway Devices: A Prospective Manikin Study With Literature Review
    Adachi, Yoshiya
    Kamata, Mineto
    Kitamura, Akira
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [38] A Comparative Study Between Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Simulated Cervical Fracture Injury: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study
    Sanu, Ajin
    Ahmed, Syed Moied
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [39] Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Wilson's score and intubation prediction score for prediction of difficult airway in an eastern Indian population-A prospective single-blind study
    Vidhya, Sri
    Sharma, Brahmanand
    Swain, Bhanu P.
    Singh, U. K.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2020, 9 (03) : 1436 - 1441
  • [40] Comparing S-Guide® and Gliderite® Times to Assist Video laryngoscopic Intubation in Patients with Simulated Difficult Airways: A Single-Blinded Randomized Prospective Study
    Nkoulou, Coralie
    Maibach, Thomas
    Bathory, Istvan
    Fournier, Nicolas
    Schoettker, Patrick
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2022, 50 (02) : 86 - 93