A simulated severe difficult airway does not alter the intubation performance with the SensaScope: a prospective randomised manikin study

被引:6
作者
Ludwig, Andreea A. [2 ]
Baulig, Werner [1 ]
Biro, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Anaesthesiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Zurcher Hohenklin, Dept Internal Med, Davos, Switzerland
关键词
difficult airway; difficult intubation; difficult laryngoscopy; SensaScope equipment; video-assisted intubation; video stylet; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; LARYNGOSCOPE; MANAGEMENT; GLIDESCOPE(R); MCGRATH(R);
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283460fc9
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Design Prospective randomised controlled study. Setting Operation unit in a tertiary academic university hospital in a central European city. Period of the study was springtime and summer 2010. Patients or other participants Twenty-four anaesthesiologists with various levels of professional experience were allocated to intubate an airway manikin either with the SensaScope (group S) or with the conventional Macintosh 3 laryngoscope (group L). Interventions Each participant performed three consecutive intubations with normal anatomy followed by three intubations with difficult anatomy. The airway difficulty was simulated by inflation of the manikin's tongue base with 40 ml of air. The times taken to view the larynx and to insert the tracheal tube were noted. The resulting tube position and the occurrence of dental damage were recorded. Main outcome measures Those planned in the protocol. Results In normal anatomy, the laryngeal view (group L 5.9 +/- 4.2 s vs. group S 9.2 +/- 3.5 s) and intubation (group L 13.4 +/- 7.6 s vs. group S 23.3 +/- 8.6 s) was more rapidly obtained with conventional laryngoscopy (values presented as mean +/- SD). In difficult anatomy, only the SensaScope permitted successful laryngeal view (group L impossible vs. group S 9.9 +/- 4.8 s) and tracheal intubation (group L impossible vs. group S 23.4 +/- 8.8 s). The latter always enabled correct tracheal tube position, whereas with laryngoscopy alone either oesophageal intubation or aborted attempts resulted. In the difficult airway setting, the frequency of simulated tooth damage was also significantly higher with conventional laryngoscopy (group L 26 of 36 vs. group S 6 of 36). Conclusions The SensaScope performed fairly well in normal intubation anatomy, although its use was more complex than with conventional laryngoscopy and it required a slightly longer time. In the difficult airway setting, the SensaScope performed as well as in normal anatomy, whereas intubation by direct laryngoscopy proved to be impossible. The SensaScope enables the user to overcome severe airway difficulties caused by large tissue masses at the level of the tongue base or mouth floor. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28:449-453
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 453
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] Learning curve and performance in simulated difficult airway for the novel C-MAC® video-stylet and C-MAC® Macintosh video laryngoscope: A prospective randomized manikin trial
    Pius, James
    Noppens, Ruediger R.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (11):
  • [22] Performance and skill retention of intubation by paramedics using seven different airway devices-A manikin study
    Ruetzler, Kurt
    Roessler, Bernhard
    Potura, Lukasz
    Priemayr, Anita
    Robak, Oliver
    Schuster, Ernst
    Frass, Michael
    RESUSCITATION, 2011, 82 (05) : 593 - 597
  • [23] Effects of head-elevated position on tracheal intubation using a McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway: a prospective randomized crossover study
    Eun Hee Chun
    Mi Hwa Chung
    Jung Eun Kim
    Kyung Mi Kim
    Hye Sun Lee
    Jung Mo Son
    Jiho Park
    Joo Hyun Jun
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [24] Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy/difficult intubation cases using upper airway ultrasound measurements in emergency department: a prospective observational study
    Sotoodehnia, Mehran
    Khodayar, Maryam
    Jalali, Alireza
    Momeni, Mehdi
    Safaie, Arash
    Abdollahi, Atefeh
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [25] Selective intubation with endotracheal tube introducer in difficult airway: A randomized, prospective, cross-over study
    Ozerol, Hakan
    Sanci, Emre
    Karakayali, Onur
    Aydin, Erdem
    Halhalli, Huseyin Cahit
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 21 (04): : 205 - 209
  • [26] A manikin study comparing the performance of the GlideScope(R), the Airtraq(R)and the C-MAC(R)in endotracheal intubation using suction-assisted laryngoscopy airway decontamination techniques in a simulated massive haematemesis scenario by emergency doctors
    Wong, Ching Hin Kevin
    Ko, Shing
    Wong, Oi Fung
    Ma, Hing Man
    Lit, Chau Hung Albert
    Shih, Yau Ngai
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 28 (05) : 291 - 304
  • [27] Does neck circumference help to predict difficult intubation in obstetric patients? A prospective observational study
    Riad, Waleed
    Ansari, Tarek
    Shetty, Nanda
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 12 (01) : 77 - 81
  • [28] Comparison Between McCoy Laryngoscope and C-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Anticipated Difficult Airway: A Prospective Randomised Study
    Garg, Mukul
    Shakya, Raju
    Lyngdoh, Nari Mary
    Pradhan, Debasis
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [29] Exchange of a Tracheal Tube and Supraglottic Airway Device: Evaluation of Different Techniques in Three Simulated Airway Scenarios (TUBE Study)-A Prospective, Randomised Controlled Study
    Kriege, Marc
    Demare, Tim
    Ruemmler, Robert
    Schmidtmann, Irene
    Wojciechowski, Janosh
    Busch, Anneke
    Ott, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [30] Fiberoptic-guided intubation after insertion of the i-gel airway device in spontaneously breathing patients with difficult airway predicted: a prospective observational study
    Arevalo-Ludena, Julian
    Juan Arcas-Bellas, Jose
    Alvarez-Rementeria, Rafael
    Munoz Alameda, Luis Enrique
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2016, 35 : 287 - 292